Comparative Analysis of Quality of Life and Attachment Style among Cancer and Dementia Informal Caregivers

IF 0.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
N. Papageorgiou, A. Zygogianni, E. Parpa, E. Tsilika, K. Mystakidou
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Quality of Life and Attachment Style among Cancer and Dementia Informal Caregivers","authors":"N. Papageorgiou,&nbsp;A. Zygogianni,&nbsp;E. Parpa,&nbsp;E. Tsilika,&nbsp;K. Mystakidou","doi":"10.1134/S2079057022020151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To record and compare the quality of life and attachment style of dementia and cancer caregivers. This is a comparative prospective cross sectional study. Participants were 45 caregivers of patients with cancer and 45 caregivers of patients with dementia. The study was conducted at a University Hospital and from a Day Centre of Alzheimer Disease and related disorders Association in Athens. Quality of caregivers’ life was measured by the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) and caregivers’ attachment was evaluated by the Experience in Close Relationships—Short Form (ECR). Caregivers’ age (cancer caregivers’ age Mean = 52.4 and SD ± 12.21, dementia caregivers’ age Mean = 58.4 and SD ± 12.8) differed significantly across diagnostic groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.005). Dementia patients were older than cancer patients (dementia patients’ age Mean = 76.8, cancer patients’ age Mean = 65, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Statistically significant difference was found between two groups regarding the duration of the disease. The duration of disease in dementia patients (Mean = 3.14 years) was significantly longer (<i>p</i> = 0.014) than in cancer patients (Mean = 1.23 years). Subscale scores in both instruments (SF-36 and ECR), showed no statistically significant differentiation. Our data showed no statistically significant differentiation in any subscale between cancer and dementia caregivers. However, both caregiver groups noticed remarkably low levels of mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":44756,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Gerontology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S2079057022020151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To record and compare the quality of life and attachment style of dementia and cancer caregivers. This is a comparative prospective cross sectional study. Participants were 45 caregivers of patients with cancer and 45 caregivers of patients with dementia. The study was conducted at a University Hospital and from a Day Centre of Alzheimer Disease and related disorders Association in Athens. Quality of caregivers’ life was measured by the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) and caregivers’ attachment was evaluated by the Experience in Close Relationships—Short Form (ECR). Caregivers’ age (cancer caregivers’ age Mean = 52.4 and SD ± 12.21, dementia caregivers’ age Mean = 58.4 and SD ± 12.8) differed significantly across diagnostic groups (p < 0.005). Dementia patients were older than cancer patients (dementia patients’ age Mean = 76.8, cancer patients’ age Mean = 65, p < 0.001). Statistically significant difference was found between two groups regarding the duration of the disease. The duration of disease in dementia patients (Mean = 3.14 years) was significantly longer (p = 0.014) than in cancer patients (Mean = 1.23 years). Subscale scores in both instruments (SF-36 and ECR), showed no statistically significant differentiation. Our data showed no statistically significant differentiation in any subscale between cancer and dementia caregivers. However, both caregiver groups noticed remarkably low levels of mental health.

癌症和痴呆症非正规照护者生活质量和依恋方式的比较分析
记录和比较痴呆症和癌症护理人员的生活质量和依恋方式。这是一项比较前瞻性的横断面研究。参与者是45名癌症患者护理人员和45名痴呆症患者护理人员。这项研究是在雅典的一所大学医院和阿尔茨海默病及相关疾病协会日间中心进行的。护理人员的生活质量通过简式36健康调查问卷(SF-36)进行测量,护理人员的依恋通过亲密关系体验简式(ECR)进行评估。护理人员的年龄(癌症护理人员的平均年龄=52.4和SD±12.21,痴呆症护理人员的人均年龄=58.4和SD±12.8)在诊断组之间有显著差异(p<0.005)。痴呆症患者比癌症患者年龄大(痴呆症患者的平均年龄=76.8,癌症患者的人均年龄=65,p<0.001)。两组之间存在统计学显著差异关于疾病的持续时间。痴呆症患者的疾病持续时间(平均3.14年)显著长于癌症患者(平均1.23年)(p=0.014)。两种工具(SF-36和ECR)的亚量表得分没有显示出统计学上的显著差异。我们的数据显示,癌症和痴呆症护理人员之间的任何分量表都没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,两组护理人员都注意到心理健康水平非常低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Gerontology
Advances in Gerontology GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Advances in Gerontology focuses on biomedical aspects of aging. The journal also publishes original articles and reviews on progress in the following research areas: demography of aging; molecular and physiological mechanisms of aging, clinical gerontology and geriatrics, prevention of premature aging, medicosocial aspects of gerontology, and behavior and psychology of the elderly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信