Intraperitoneal instillation of levobupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOLOGY
Rekha Roat, Hemant Jingar, R. Verma, Mamta Damor
{"title":"Intraperitoneal instillation of levobupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy","authors":"Rekha Roat, Hemant Jingar, R. Verma, Mamta Damor","doi":"10.4103/aihb.aihb_123_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Laparoscopic procedures have many advantages over open procedures, such as less haemorrhage, better cosmetic results, less post-operative pain and shorter recovery time, leading to a shorter hospital stay and less expenditure. Hence, the present study was undertaken for comparing the effect of intraperitoneal installation of levobupivacaine (L-B) plus dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective randomized study conducted in our hospital on 60 American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade I or II patients of either sex, aged 18–55 years, scheduled to undergo LC surgery under general anaesthesia. All patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each: Group 1: Patients were given 20 ml of 0.5% L-B plus 0.25-μg/kg dexmedetomidine intraperitoneally after gallbladder removal, and Group 2: Patients were given 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 0.25-μg/kg dexmedetomidine intraperitoneally after gallbladder removal. Post-operatively, the patients were assessed for pain utilizing a visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS was graded on a scale of 0–10. VAS was recorded at 0, 1, 8, 12 and 24 h post-operatively and compared. Results: Mean time to first analgesic requirement among patients of Group 1 and Group 2 was 365.1 min and 297.2 min, respectively, which shows a statistically significant longer post-operative analgesic effect in Group 1 patients. While comparing VAS at different time intervals in between the two study groups, all the readings were comparable. The difference was found to be non-significant in the two groups (P > 0.05). Nausea and vomiting were seen in two patients in Group 1 and three patients in Group 2. Complications were noted in <10% of the patients in both groups. Conclusion: Intraperitoneal instillation of local anaesthetic solution in LC provides effective post-operative analgesia, and analgesia provided by L-B plus dexmedetomidine is better than ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine.","PeriodicalId":7341,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Human Biology","volume":"13 1","pages":"177 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aihb.aihb_123_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic procedures have many advantages over open procedures, such as less haemorrhage, better cosmetic results, less post-operative pain and shorter recovery time, leading to a shorter hospital stay and less expenditure. Hence, the present study was undertaken for comparing the effect of intraperitoneal installation of levobupivacaine (L-B) plus dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Materials and Methods: This was a prospective randomized study conducted in our hospital on 60 American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade I or II patients of either sex, aged 18–55 years, scheduled to undergo LC surgery under general anaesthesia. All patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each: Group 1: Patients were given 20 ml of 0.5% L-B plus 0.25-μg/kg dexmedetomidine intraperitoneally after gallbladder removal, and Group 2: Patients were given 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 0.25-μg/kg dexmedetomidine intraperitoneally after gallbladder removal. Post-operatively, the patients were assessed for pain utilizing a visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS was graded on a scale of 0–10. VAS was recorded at 0, 1, 8, 12 and 24 h post-operatively and compared. Results: Mean time to first analgesic requirement among patients of Group 1 and Group 2 was 365.1 min and 297.2 min, respectively, which shows a statistically significant longer post-operative analgesic effect in Group 1 patients. While comparing VAS at different time intervals in between the two study groups, all the readings were comparable. The difference was found to be non-significant in the two groups (P > 0.05). Nausea and vomiting were seen in two patients in Group 1 and three patients in Group 2. Complications were noted in <10% of the patients in both groups. Conclusion: Intraperitoneal instillation of local anaesthetic solution in LC provides effective post-operative analgesia, and analgesia provided by L-B plus dexmedetomidine is better than ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine.
左布比卡因加右美托咪定与罗哌卡因加右美托咪定腹膜内滴注用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛
腹腔镜手术比开放手术有许多优点,如出血少,美容效果好,术后疼痛少,恢复时间短,住院时间短,费用少。因此,本研究旨在比较左布比卡因(L-B)联合右美托咪定与罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)患者术后镇痛中的效果。材料与方法:本研究是在我院进行的一项前瞻性随机研究,对象为60例在全身麻醉下行LC手术的美国麻醉学会I级或II级患者,年龄18-55岁,男女均可。所有患者随机分为两组,每组30人,第1组:胆囊切除后腹腔给予0.5% L-B 20 ml + 0.25 μg/kg右美托咪定;第2组:胆囊切除后腹腔给予0.5%罗哌卡因20 ml + 0.25 μg/kg右美托咪定。术后,使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估患者的疼痛。VAS评分为0-10分。分别于术后0、1、8、12、24 h进行VAS记录并比较。结果:第1组和第2组患者到达首次需要镇痛药的平均时间分别为365.1 min和297.2 min,第1组患者术后镇痛效果较长,差异有统计学意义。在比较两个研究组在不同时间间隔的VAS时,所有读数都具有可比性。两组比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。1组2例恶心呕吐,2组3例恶心呕吐。两组患者并发症发生率均<10%。结论:LC腹腔注射局麻液能有效地实现术后镇痛,且L-B联合右美托咪定的镇痛效果优于罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信