The Use/Less Citations in Feminist Research

IF 1.3 4区社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES

Australian Feminist Studies Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.1080/08164649.2021.1995845

Xin Liu

引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article points to the paradox in feminist citation practices. It provides a brief overview of the key issues at stake in feminist citational practices. By highlighting the ways in which the logic of territoriality, authority and property continues to inform the mood and mode of moralistic repair, it cautions again the reification of certain racialised and gendered bodies as the remedy, ground and supplement for feminist research ethics. Thinking through the figure of the (bio)degradable, this article asks whether it is possible to consider feminist citation as use/less.

查看原文本刊更多论文

女性主义研究中的使用/较少引用

摘要本文指出了女性主义引文实践中的悖论。它简要概述了女权主义引用实践中的关键问题。通过强调属地性、权威性和财产性的逻辑继续影响道德修复的情绪和模式，它再次提醒人们，将某些种族化和性别化的身体具体化是女权主义研究伦理的补救、基础和补充。通过思考（生物）可降解的数字，本文询问是否有可能将女权主义引文视为使用/较少。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Australian Feminist Studies WOMENS STUDIES-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Australian Feminist Studies was launched in the summer of 1985 by the Research Centre for Women"s Studies at the University of Adelaide. During the subsequent two decades it has become a leading journal of feminist studies. As an international, peer-reviewed journal, Australian Feminist Studies is proud to sustain a clear political commitment to feminist teaching, research and scholarship. The journal publishes articles of the highest calibre from all around the world, that contribute to current developments and issues across a spectrum of feminisms.