Efficacy of nitrous oxide-oxygen inhalation versus oral midazolam-promethazine as sedative agents in pediatric patients: a comparative study

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Karishma, Sonam Kohli, M. Rajeesh, Usha Balan, B. Choudhury, Henston DSouza
{"title":"Efficacy of nitrous oxide-oxygen inhalation versus oral midazolam-promethazine as sedative agents in pediatric patients: a comparative study","authors":"Karishma, Sonam Kohli, M. Rajeesh, Usha Balan, B. Choudhury, Henston DSouza","doi":"10.4103/epj.epj_78_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Managing difficult and uncooperative pediatric dental patients is a challenging task. Conscious sedation has been propagated as a pharmacological means for handling such situations. Objective To evaluate the effects of sedation using nitrous oxide-oxygen inhalation versus oral midazolam-promethazine in pediatric patients. Patients and methods A total of 100 pediatric patients were selected and divided into two equal categories: group 1 (midazolam-promethazine) and group 2 (N2O-O2). Ethical committee approval was obtained, and patients were assessed. Data collected were analyzed using an unpaired t test. Results Duration of sedation was found to be statistically significant, and a higher duration was found for group 1. No significant differences were noted in the behavior rating scale with either of the combinations and in pulse oximeter readings. Conclusion Midazolam/promethazine is better in inducing longer sedation than N2O/O2.","PeriodicalId":11568,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"526 - 530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/epj.epj_78_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Managing difficult and uncooperative pediatric dental patients is a challenging task. Conscious sedation has been propagated as a pharmacological means for handling such situations. Objective To evaluate the effects of sedation using nitrous oxide-oxygen inhalation versus oral midazolam-promethazine in pediatric patients. Patients and methods A total of 100 pediatric patients were selected and divided into two equal categories: group 1 (midazolam-promethazine) and group 2 (N2O-O2). Ethical committee approval was obtained, and patients were assessed. Data collected were analyzed using an unpaired t test. Results Duration of sedation was found to be statistically significant, and a higher duration was found for group 1. No significant differences were noted in the behavior rating scale with either of the combinations and in pulse oximeter readings. Conclusion Midazolam/promethazine is better in inducing longer sedation than N2O/O2.
一氧化二氮-氧气吸入与口服咪达唑仑-异丙嗪作为儿科患者镇静药物的疗效比较研究
背景管理困难和不合作的儿科牙科患者是一项具有挑战性的任务。意识镇静已经被宣传为一种处理这种情况的药理学手段。目的评价一氧化二氮吸氧与口服咪达唑仑异丙嗪对儿童的镇静作用。患者和方法共选择100名儿科患者,分为两类:第一组(咪达唑仑异丙嗪)和第二组(N2O-O2)。获得伦理委员会的批准,并对患者进行评估。使用非配对t检验对收集的数据进行分析。结果镇静持续时间具有统计学意义,第1组的镇静持续时间更高。两种组合的行为评定量表和脉搏血氧计读数均无显著差异。结论咪达唑仑/异丙嗪的镇静效果优于N2O/O2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal
Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信