Morbidity, mortality and cost of osteoporotic fractures—should proximal humerus fractures be taken as seriously as hip fractures?

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
C. Eck, C. Klein, H. Rahmi, K. Scheidt, M. Schultzel, Brian K. Lee, J. Itamura
{"title":"Morbidity, mortality and cost of osteoporotic fractures—should proximal humerus fractures be taken as seriously as hip fractures?","authors":"C. Eck, C. Klein, H. Rahmi, K. Scheidt, M. Schultzel, Brian K. Lee, J. Itamura","doi":"10.21037/AOJ.2019.01.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Proximal humerus fractures are common in the population over age 65. Several studies have demonstrated high morbidity and mortality rates associated with several osteoporotic fracture types. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the risk factors, morbidity, mortality and cost of proximal humerus, distal radius, hip and vertebral compression fractures. Methods: From the Medicare Registry, patients diagnosed with a proximal humerus, distal radius, hip or vertebral compression fracture based on the ICD-9 coding were identified. Sex, race, age, fracture type, healthcare cost, mortality, blood transfusion requirement, and comorbidities were documented. Results: Between 2010 and 2014 there were 50,237,330 inpatient claims and 1,183,966 (2.4%) of those were specifically for 1 of the 4 osteoporotic fracture types. Mortality rate during index admission for all four fractures combined was 2.2%. Mortality rate was 1% for proximal humerus, as compared to 0.4% for distal radius, 2.5% for hip and 1.8% for vertebral compression fractures. The highest cost was associated with hip fractures and the lowest cost with distal radius fractures. The hip and vertebral compression fracture patients had the most documented comorbidities. Patients were more likely to be female (OR 2.105, 95% CI: 2.096–2.113), white (OR 2.600, 95% CI: 2.582–2.617), and over 84 years of age (OR 5.979, 95% CI: 5.957–6.001) in all fracture types. Conclusions: Proximal humerus fractures carry similar risk factors, morbidity, mortality, and health care costs as other osteoporotic fracture types. The findings of the present study are clinically relevant, as life expectancy continues to increase and the Medicare population continues to grow. This will lead to an increase in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures. Proper screening and treatment of osteoporosis may help prevent some of these fractures.","PeriodicalId":44459,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Joint","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/AOJ.2019.01.01","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Joint","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/AOJ.2019.01.01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Proximal humerus fractures are common in the population over age 65. Several studies have demonstrated high morbidity and mortality rates associated with several osteoporotic fracture types. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the risk factors, morbidity, mortality and cost of proximal humerus, distal radius, hip and vertebral compression fractures. Methods: From the Medicare Registry, patients diagnosed with a proximal humerus, distal radius, hip or vertebral compression fracture based on the ICD-9 coding were identified. Sex, race, age, fracture type, healthcare cost, mortality, blood transfusion requirement, and comorbidities were documented. Results: Between 2010 and 2014 there were 50,237,330 inpatient claims and 1,183,966 (2.4%) of those were specifically for 1 of the 4 osteoporotic fracture types. Mortality rate during index admission for all four fractures combined was 2.2%. Mortality rate was 1% for proximal humerus, as compared to 0.4% for distal radius, 2.5% for hip and 1.8% for vertebral compression fractures. The highest cost was associated with hip fractures and the lowest cost with distal radius fractures. The hip and vertebral compression fracture patients had the most documented comorbidities. Patients were more likely to be female (OR 2.105, 95% CI: 2.096–2.113), white (OR 2.600, 95% CI: 2.582–2.617), and over 84 years of age (OR 5.979, 95% CI: 5.957–6.001) in all fracture types. Conclusions: Proximal humerus fractures carry similar risk factors, morbidity, mortality, and health care costs as other osteoporotic fracture types. The findings of the present study are clinically relevant, as life expectancy continues to increase and the Medicare population continues to grow. This will lead to an increase in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures. Proper screening and treatment of osteoporosis may help prevent some of these fractures.
骨质疏松性骨折的发病率、死亡率和成本——肱骨近端骨折应该像髋部骨折一样受到重视吗?
背景:肱骨近端骨折常见于65岁以上人群。一些研究表明,高发病率和死亡率与几种骨质疏松性骨折类型有关。本研究的目的是调查和比较肱骨近端、桡骨远端、髋关节和椎体压缩性骨折的危险因素、发病率、死亡率和成本。方法:从医疗保险注册表中,根据ICD-9编码识别诊断为肱骨近端、桡骨远端、髋关节或椎体压缩性骨折的患者。记录性别、种族、年龄、骨折类型、医疗费用、死亡率、输血需求和合并症。结果:2010 - 2014年共有50,237,330例住院理赔,其中1183,966例(2.4%)是针对4种骨质疏松性骨折类型中的1种。所有4例骨折患者入院时的总死亡率为2.2%。肱骨近端死亡率为1%,桡骨远端死亡率为0.4%,髋关节死亡率为2.5%,椎体压缩性骨折死亡率为1.8%。髋部骨折的成本最高,桡骨远端骨折的成本最低。髋部和椎体压缩性骨折患者的合并症最多。在所有骨折类型中,患者多为女性(OR 2.105, 95% CI: 2.096-2.113)、白人(OR 2.600, 95% CI: 2.582-2.617)和84岁以上(OR 5.979, 95% CI: 5.957-6.001)。结论:肱骨近端骨折与其他骨质疏松性骨折类型具有相似的危险因素、发病率、死亡率和医疗费用。随着预期寿命的持续增加和医疗保险人口的持续增长,本研究的结果具有临床相关性。这将导致骨质疏松性骨折的发生率增加。骨质疏松症的适当筛查和治疗可能有助于预防这些骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Joint
Annals of Joint ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
-25.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信