Prognostic significance of CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores to predict unfavorable outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
M. Montazeri, M. Keykhaei, Sina Rashedi, S. Karbalai Saleh, M. Pazoki, A. Hadadi, Seyyed Hamidreza Sharifnia, Mehran Sotoodehnia, Sanaz Ajloo, Samira Kafan, H. Ashraf
{"title":"Prognostic significance of CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores to predict unfavorable outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19","authors":"M. Montazeri, M. Keykhaei, Sina Rashedi, S. Karbalai Saleh, M. Pazoki, A. Hadadi, Seyyed Hamidreza Sharifnia, Mehran Sotoodehnia, Sanaz Ajloo, Samira Kafan, H. Ashraf","doi":"10.34172/jcvtr.2022.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Owing to the imposed burden of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19),the need for stratifying the prognosis of patients has never been timelier. Hence, we aimed to ascertain the value of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and CHA2DS2-VASc-M (one point for male instead of female) scores to predict unfavorable outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients above 18 years of age with confirmed COVID-19,who were admitted between February 16 and November 1, 2020. The primary endpoint of this study was three-month all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were considered four major in-hospital clinical features, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac injury,acute kidney injury, and mechanical ventilation. Results: A total of 1,406 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were studied, among which 301(21.40%) patients died during the follow-up period. Regarding the risk scores, CHADS 2≥1,CHA2DS2-VASc≥2, and CHA2DS2-VASc-M≥2 were significantly associated with mortality. The performance of all risk scores for predicting mortality was satisfactory (area under the curve:0.668, 0.668, and 0.681, respectively). Appraising secondary endpoints, we found that all three risk scores were associated with increased risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac injury, acute kidney injury, and mechanical ventilation. Lastly, we revealed that all risk scores were significantly correlated with serum levels of laboratory biomarkers. Conclusion: Our analysis illustrated that the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and CHA2DS2-VASc-Mscores could aid prognostication of unfavorable outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Therefore,these easily calculable methods could be integrated into the overall therapeutic strategy to guide the COVID-19 management more accurately.","PeriodicalId":15207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jcvtr.2022.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Owing to the imposed burden of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19),the need for stratifying the prognosis of patients has never been timelier. Hence, we aimed to ascertain the value of CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and CHA2DS2-VASc-M (one point for male instead of female) scores to predict unfavorable outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients above 18 years of age with confirmed COVID-19,who were admitted between February 16 and November 1, 2020. The primary endpoint of this study was three-month all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were considered four major in-hospital clinical features, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac injury,acute kidney injury, and mechanical ventilation. Results: A total of 1,406 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were studied, among which 301(21.40%) patients died during the follow-up period. Regarding the risk scores, CHADS 2≥1,CHA2DS2-VASc≥2, and CHA2DS2-VASc-M≥2 were significantly associated with mortality. The performance of all risk scores for predicting mortality was satisfactory (area under the curve:0.668, 0.668, and 0.681, respectively). Appraising secondary endpoints, we found that all three risk scores were associated with increased risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome, cardiac injury, acute kidney injury, and mechanical ventilation. Lastly, we revealed that all risk scores were significantly correlated with serum levels of laboratory biomarkers. Conclusion: Our analysis illustrated that the CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and CHA2DS2-VASc-Mscores could aid prognostication of unfavorable outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Therefore,these easily calculable methods could be integrated into the overall therapeutic strategy to guide the COVID-19 management more accurately.
CHADS2和CHA2DS2-VASc评分预测COVID-19住院患者不良结局的预后意义
简介:由于2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)的负担,对患者预后进行分层的必要性前所未有。因此,我们旨在确定CHADS2、CHA2DS2-VASc和CHA2DS2-VASc-M(男性一分,女性一分)评分对预测新冠肺炎患者不良结局的价值。方法:我们招募了2020年2月16日至11月1日期间连续入院的18岁以上确诊新冠肺炎患者。这项研究的主要终点是三个月的全因死亡率。次要终点考虑了四个主要的住院临床特征,包括急性呼吸窘迫综合征、心脏损伤、急性肾损伤和机械通气。结果:共研究了1406名新冠肺炎住院患者,其中301名(21.40%)患者在随访期间死亡。关于风险评分,CHADS 2≥1、CHA2DS2-VASc≥2和CHA2DS2-VASc-M≥2与死亡率显著相关。所有风险评分在预测死亡率方面的表现均令人满意(曲线下面积分别为0.668、0.668和0.681)。通过评估次要终点,我们发现所有三种风险评分都与急性呼吸窘迫综合征、心脏损伤、急性肾损伤和机械通气的风险增加有关。最后,我们发现所有风险评分都与实验室生物标志物的血清水平显著相关。结论:我们的分析表明,CHADS2、CHA2DS2-VASc和CHA2DS2-VASc-Mscores可以帮助预测新冠肺炎患者的不良结果。因此,这些易于计算的方法可以整合到整体治疗策略中,以更准确地指导新冠肺炎的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research
Journal of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信