Macular neovascularization lesion type and vision outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: post hoc analysis of HARBOR.

K Bailey Freund, Giovanni Staurenghi, Jesse J Jung, Sandrine A Zweifel, Mariano Cozzi, Lauren Hill, Steven Blotner, Min Tsuboi, Shamika Gune
{"title":"Macular neovascularization lesion type and vision outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: post hoc analysis of HARBOR.","authors":"K Bailey Freund, Giovanni Staurenghi, Jesse J Jung, Sandrine A Zweifel, Mariano Cozzi, Lauren Hill, Steven Blotner, Min Tsuboi, Shamika Gune","doi":"10.1007/s00417-022-05586-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize relationships between Consensus on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Nomenclature (CONAN) Study Group classifications of macular neovascularization (MNV) and visual responses to ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a post hoc analysis of the phase 3 HARBOR trial of ranibizumab in nAMD. Analyses included ranibizumab-treated eyes with baseline multimodal imaging data; baseline MNV; subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid at screening, baseline, or week 1; and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images through month 24 (n = 700). Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over time and mean BCVA change at months 12 and 24 were compared between eyes with type 1, type 2/mixed type 1 and 2 (type 2/M), and any type 3 MNV at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, 263 (37.6%), 287 (41.0%), and 150 (21.4%) eyes had type 1, type 2/M, and any type 3 lesions, respectively. Type 1 eyes had the best mean BCVA at baseline (59.0 [95% CI: 57.7-60.3] letters) and month 24 (67.7 [65.8-69.6] letters), whereas type 2/M eyes had the worst (50.0 [48.6-51.4] letters and 60.8 [58.7-62.9] letters, respectively). Mean BCVA gains at month 24 were most pronounced for type 2/M eyes (10.8 [8.9-12.7] letters) and similar for type 1 (8.7 [6.9-10.5] letters) and any type 3 eyes (8.3 [6.3-10.3] letters).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in BCVA outcomes between CONAN lesion type subgroups support the use of an anatomic classification system to characterize MNV and prognosticate visual responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for nAMD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00891735. Date of registration: April 29, 2009.</p>","PeriodicalId":75465,"journal":{"name":"Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. Albrecht von Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology","volume":"260 1","pages":"2437-2447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8891431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie. Albrecht von Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05586-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize relationships between Consensus on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Nomenclature (CONAN) Study Group classifications of macular neovascularization (MNV) and visual responses to ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of the phase 3 HARBOR trial of ranibizumab in nAMD. Analyses included ranibizumab-treated eyes with baseline multimodal imaging data; baseline MNV; subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid at screening, baseline, or week 1; and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images through month 24 (n = 700). Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over time and mean BCVA change at months 12 and 24 were compared between eyes with type 1, type 2/mixed type 1 and 2 (type 2/M), and any type 3 MNV at baseline.

Results: At baseline, 263 (37.6%), 287 (41.0%), and 150 (21.4%) eyes had type 1, type 2/M, and any type 3 lesions, respectively. Type 1 eyes had the best mean BCVA at baseline (59.0 [95% CI: 57.7-60.3] letters) and month 24 (67.7 [65.8-69.6] letters), whereas type 2/M eyes had the worst (50.0 [48.6-51.4] letters and 60.8 [58.7-62.9] letters, respectively). Mean BCVA gains at month 24 were most pronounced for type 2/M eyes (10.8 [8.9-12.7] letters) and similar for type 1 (8.7 [6.9-10.5] letters) and any type 3 eyes (8.3 [6.3-10.3] letters).

Conclusion: Differences in BCVA outcomes between CONAN lesion type subgroups support the use of an anatomic classification system to characterize MNV and prognosticate visual responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for nAMD.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00891735. Date of registration: April 29, 2009.

黄斑新生血管病变类型和新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的视力结果:HARBOR的事后分析
目的:描述新生血管性老年性黄斑变性命名法共识(CONAN)研究小组对黄斑新生血管(MNV)的分类与新生血管性老年性黄斑变性(nAMD)患者对雷尼珠单抗的视觉反应之间的关系:这是对雷尼珠单抗治疗 nAMD 的 HARBOR 3 期试验进行的事后分析。分析包括雷尼单抗治疗眼的基线多模态成像数据;基线MNV;筛查、基线或第1周时的视网膜下和/或视网膜内积液;以及第24个月的光谱域光学相干断层扫描图像(n = 700)。对基线时为1型、2型/1型和2型混合型(2型/M型)以及任何3型MNV的眼睛进行了比较,比较了随时间变化的平均最佳矫正视力(BCVA)以及第12个月和第24个月时的平均BCVA变化:基线时,分别有 263 只(37.6%)、287 只(41.0%)和 150 只(21.4%)眼睛有 1 型、2 型/M 型和任何 3 型病变。1 型眼在基线(59.0 [95% CI: 57.7-60.3] 个字母)和第 24 个月(67.7 [65.8-69.6] 个字母)时的平均 BCVA 最佳,而 2/M 型眼最差(分别为 50.0 [48.6-51.4] 个字母和 60.8 [58.7-62.9] 个字母)。第24个月时,2/M型眼睛的平均BCVA增益最明显(10.8 [8.9-12.7] 个字母),1型(8.7 [6.9-10.5] 个字母)和任何3型眼睛(8.3 [6.3-10.3] 个字母)的平均BCVA增益相似:结论:CONAN病变类型亚组之间的BCVA结果差异支持使用解剖学分类系统来描述MNV的特征,并预测nAMD抗血管内皮生长因子疗法的视觉反应:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT00891735。注册日期:2009 年 4 月 29 日:注册日期:2009 年 4 月 29 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信