Comparison of the oncolytic activity of recombinant vaccinia virus strains LIVP-RFP and MVA-RFP against solid tumors

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Y. Shakiba, ER Naberezhnaya, DV Kochetkov, G. Yusubalieva, P. Vorobyev, P. Chumakov, VP Baklaushev, A. Lipatova
{"title":"Comparison of the oncolytic activity of recombinant vaccinia virus strains LIVP-RFP and MVA-RFP against solid tumors","authors":"Y. Shakiba, ER Naberezhnaya, DV Kochetkov, G. Yusubalieva, P. Vorobyev, P. Chumakov, VP Baklaushev, A. Lipatova","doi":"10.24075/brsmu.2023.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among oncolytic viruses, modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), a highly attenuated vaccinia virus (VV) is a well-studied variant with promising results in preclinical and clinical trials. The Lister VV strain from the Moscow Institute of Viral Preparations (LIVP) has been studied to a lesser extent than MVA and has a different oncolytic property from MVA. The aim of this work was to compare the oncolytic efficacy of LIVP and MVA strains against solid tumors. We developed recombinant variants LIVP-RFP and MVA-RFP; to enhance onco-selectivity thymidine kinase (TK) gene was inactivated by insertion of red fluorescent protein (RFP) gene to the TK locus. The replication kinetics and oncolytic activity of the obtained recombinant strains were evaluated in vitro and in vivo on tumor cell lines and mouse syngeneic tumor models of metastatic mouse 4T1 mammary adenocarcinoma, CT26 colon adenocarcinoma, and B16 melanoma. Both MVA-RFP and LIVP-RFP showed high replication efficiency in tumor cells and pronounced oncolytic activity against B16 melanoma and 4T1 breast adenocarcinoma allografts. In relation to 4T1, which is a model of triple negative human breast cancer, LIVP-RFP showed more than 50% increased cytotoxicity in in vitro tests compared to MVA-RFP, as well as a significant slowdown in the progression of 4T1 allografts and an increase in animal survival in experiments in vivo. Thus, the LIVP strain may be more promising than MVA as a platform for the development of recombinant oncolytic viruses for the breast cancer treatment.","PeriodicalId":9344,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Russian State Medical University","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Russian State Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24075/brsmu.2023.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Among oncolytic viruses, modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), a highly attenuated vaccinia virus (VV) is a well-studied variant with promising results in preclinical and clinical trials. The Lister VV strain from the Moscow Institute of Viral Preparations (LIVP) has been studied to a lesser extent than MVA and has a different oncolytic property from MVA. The aim of this work was to compare the oncolytic efficacy of LIVP and MVA strains against solid tumors. We developed recombinant variants LIVP-RFP and MVA-RFP; to enhance onco-selectivity thymidine kinase (TK) gene was inactivated by insertion of red fluorescent protein (RFP) gene to the TK locus. The replication kinetics and oncolytic activity of the obtained recombinant strains were evaluated in vitro and in vivo on tumor cell lines and mouse syngeneic tumor models of metastatic mouse 4T1 mammary adenocarcinoma, CT26 colon adenocarcinoma, and B16 melanoma. Both MVA-RFP and LIVP-RFP showed high replication efficiency in tumor cells and pronounced oncolytic activity against B16 melanoma and 4T1 breast adenocarcinoma allografts. In relation to 4T1, which is a model of triple negative human breast cancer, LIVP-RFP showed more than 50% increased cytotoxicity in in vitro tests compared to MVA-RFP, as well as a significant slowdown in the progression of 4T1 allografts and an increase in animal survival in experiments in vivo. Thus, the LIVP strain may be more promising than MVA as a platform for the development of recombinant oncolytic viruses for the breast cancer treatment.
重组痘苗病毒株LIVP-RFP与MVA-RFP对实体瘤溶瘤活性的比较
在溶瘤病毒中,改良痘苗病毒安卡拉(MVA)是一种高度减毒的痘苗病毒(VV),是一种研究充分的变体,在临床前和临床试验中取得了有希望的结果。来自莫斯科病毒制剂研究所(LIVP)的李斯特菌VV菌株的研究程度低于MVA,并且具有与MVA不同的溶瘤特性。这项工作的目的是比较LIVP和MVA菌株对实体瘤的溶瘤效果。我们开发了重组变体LIVP-RFP和MVA-RFP;为了提高肿瘤选择性,通过将红色荧光蛋白(RFP)基因插入TK基因座来灭活胸苷激酶(TK)基因。在转移性小鼠4T1乳腺腺癌、CT26结肠癌和B16黑色素瘤的肿瘤细胞系和小鼠同基因肿瘤模型上,在体外和体内评估获得的重组菌株的复制动力学和溶瘤活性。MVA-RFP和LIVP-RFP在肿瘤细胞中均显示出高复制效率,并对B16黑色素瘤和4T1乳腺腺癌同种异体移植物具有显著的溶瘤活性。关于作为三阴性人类癌症模型的4T1,与MVA-RFP相比,LIVP-RFP在体外测试中显示出超过50%的细胞毒性增加,并且在体内实验中4T1同种异体移植物的进展显著减慢,动物存活率增加。因此,作为开发用于乳腺癌症治疗的重组溶瘤病毒的平台,LIVP菌株可能比MVA更有前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Russian State Medical University
Bulletin of Russian State Medical University MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Russian State Medical University (Bulletin of RSMU, ISSN Print 2500–1094, ISSN Online 2542–1204) is a peer-reviewed medical journal of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Moscow, Russia). The original language of the journal is Russian (Vestnik Rossiyskogo Gosudarstvennogo Meditsinskogo Universiteta, Vestnik RGMU, ISSN Print 2070–7320, ISSN Online 2070–7339). Founded in 1994, it is issued once every two months publishing articles on clinical medicine and medical and biological sciences, first of all oncology, neurobiology, allergy and immunology, medical genetics, medical microbiology and infectious diseases. Every issue is thematic. Deadlines for manuscript submission are announced in advance. The number of publications on topics in spite of the issue topic is limited. The journal accepts only original articles submitted by their authors, including articles that present methods and techniques, clinical cases and opinions. Authors must guarantee that their work has not been previously published elsewhere in whole or in part and in other languages and is not under consideration by another scientific journal. The journal publishes only one review per issue; the review is ordered by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信