Comparative Study of Efficacy of Buprenorphine and Fentanyl on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Changes to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Study.

Q3 Medicine
Vikas Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar, A. Bharti, R. Avinash, K. H. Raghwendra
{"title":"Comparative Study of Efficacy of Buprenorphine and Fentanyl on Attenuation of Hemodynamic Changes to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Study.","authors":"Vikas Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar, A. Bharti, R. Avinash, K. H. Raghwendra","doi":"10.6859/aja.202203_60(1).0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nHemodynamic changes are the most common predicted response after laryngoscopy and intubation during general anesthesia. We compared the efficacy of buprenorphine with fentanyl to attenuate this stress response.\n\n\nMETHODS\nOne hundred and thirty patients of either sex between the age group of 18-70 years, admitted for the routine surgical procedure under general anesthesia were enrolled in this double blind, randomized, clinical study. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups (60 patients in each group): group F received fentanyl 2 μg/kg, and group B received buprenorphine 2.5 μg/kg; both via intravenous route. Each group received a total volume of 10 mL by adding normal saline to the total drug volume, given over 60 seconds, 5 minutes before intubation. Thereafter patients were induced using routine balanced anesthesia technique, and the hemodynamic parameters were observed at baseline (0 minute), 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug and again at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 minutes after intubation. Continuous variables were presented as mean with an 80% confidence interval, and a t-test was applied for comparing the difference of means between two groups after we checked the normality condition. Chi-square test was applied to test the independence of attributes of categorical variables. Repeated measures two-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the outcome variables between the two groups.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIn both groups, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were statistically insignificant up to 5 minutes after study drug, thereafter mean HR and MAP at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 minutes after intubation, were statistically significant between the two groups, and P value was less than 0.05.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe dose of 2.5 μg/kg buprenorphine is an effective alternative to fentanyl 2 μg/kg for attenuating the hemodynamic response accompanying laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation without causing any hemodynamic adverse effect.","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":"60 1 1","pages":"26-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202203_60(1).0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Hemodynamic changes are the most common predicted response after laryngoscopy and intubation during general anesthesia. We compared the efficacy of buprenorphine with fentanyl to attenuate this stress response. METHODS One hundred and thirty patients of either sex between the age group of 18-70 years, admitted for the routine surgical procedure under general anesthesia were enrolled in this double blind, randomized, clinical study. Patients were randomly assigned into two equal groups (60 patients in each group): group F received fentanyl 2 μg/kg, and group B received buprenorphine 2.5 μg/kg; both via intravenous route. Each group received a total volume of 10 mL by adding normal saline to the total drug volume, given over 60 seconds, 5 minutes before intubation. Thereafter patients were induced using routine balanced anesthesia technique, and the hemodynamic parameters were observed at baseline (0 minute), 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the administration of the study drug and again at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 minutes after intubation. Continuous variables were presented as mean with an 80% confidence interval, and a t-test was applied for comparing the difference of means between two groups after we checked the normality condition. Chi-square test was applied to test the independence of attributes of categorical variables. Repeated measures two-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the outcome variables between the two groups. RESULTS In both groups, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were statistically insignificant up to 5 minutes after study drug, thereafter mean HR and MAP at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 minutes after intubation, were statistically significant between the two groups, and P value was less than 0.05. CONCLUSIONS The dose of 2.5 μg/kg buprenorphine is an effective alternative to fentanyl 2 μg/kg for attenuating the hemodynamic response accompanying laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation without causing any hemodynamic adverse effect.
丁丙诺啡和芬太尼减轻喉镜和插管血液动力学变化的疗效比较研究:一项前瞻性随机双盲研究。
背景血液动力学变化是全麻期间喉镜检查和插管后最常见的预测反应。我们比较了丁丙诺啡和芬太尼减轻这种应激反应的疗效。方法将130名年龄在18-70岁之间的男女患者纳入这项双盲随机临床研究,他们在全麻下接受常规手术。患者被随机分为两组(每组60例):F组接受芬太尼2μg/kg,B组接受丁丙诺啡2.5μg/kg;均通过静脉途径。每组在插管前5分钟,通过在总药物体积中加入生理盐水,在60秒内给药,总体积为10mL。此后,使用常规平衡麻醉技术诱导患者,并在基线(0分钟)、给药研究药物后1、3和5分钟以及插管后1、4、5、7和10分钟再次观察血液动力学参数。连续变量以平均值表示,置信区间为80%,在我们检查正态性条件后,应用t检验来比较两组之间的平均值差异。卡方检验用于检验分类变量属性的独立性。重复测量双向方差分析用于比较两组之间的结果变量。结果在两组中,平均动脉血压(MAP)和心率(HR)在给药后5分钟内均无统计学意义,此后插管后1、3、5、7和10分钟的平均HR和MAP在两组之间具有统计学意义,结论丁丙诺啡2.5μ。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian journal of anesthesiology
Asian journal of anesthesiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信