Approaching Negotiations in Urban Redevelopment Projects: A Multiple Case Analysis of Stakeholder Involvement in Community Benefit Agreements

IF 3.4 2区经济学 Q1 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING

Planning Theory & Practice Pub Date : 2021-09-09 DOI:10.1080/14649357.2021.1972129

Jeff Biggar

引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper explores planning negotiations in neighbourhood-level urban redevelopment. Rapidly densifying cities routinely approve development projects that exceed zoning permissions, conditional on negotiations with developers for affordable housing and park space, among other public benefits. This paper provides a case analysis on negotiations in multi-actor urban redevelopment projects involving density bonusing in Toronto, Canada. Local actors framed urban redevelopment to justify broad public need, while using their wherewithal to build bargaining power with developers and city councillors. The paper finds that negotiations are symptomatic of ad-hoc planning and perpetuate uneven development processes, which pose challenges for planners to ensure stability and predictability in market-driven, discretionary planning environments.

查看原文本刊更多论文

城市改造项目谈判的逼近:社区利益协议中利益相关者参与的多案例分析

摘要本文探讨了街区级城市改造中的规划协商。人口迅速密集的城市通常会批准超出分区许可的开发项目，条件是与开发商就经济适用房和公园空间等公共福利进行谈判。本文对加拿大多伦多市涉及密度奖金的多主体城市改造项目谈判进行了案例分析。当地行为者将城市重建规划为广泛的公众需求辩护，同时利用他们的资金与开发商和市议员建立议价能力。该论文发现，谈判是临时规划的症状，并使不平衡的发展过程永久化，这对规划者在市场驱动的、自由裁量的规划环境中确保稳定性和可预测性构成挑战。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Planning Theory & Practice Multiple-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

5.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Planning Theory & Practice provides an international focus for the development of theory and practice in spatial planning and a forum to promote the policy dimensions of space and place. Published four times a year in conjunction with the Royal Town Planning Institute, London, it publishes original articles and review papers from both academics and practitioners with the aim of encouraging more effective, two-way communication between theory and practice. The Editors invite robustly researched papers which raise issues at the leading edge of planning theory and practice, and welcome papers on controversial subjects. Contributors in the early stages of their academic careers are encouraged, as are rejoinders to items previously published.