The use of Halliday’s Theme-Rheme on Google’s Privacy Policy Text: A Forensic Linguistics Research

Sabtra Lesmana, Sawirman Sawirman, Fajri Usman
{"title":"The use of Halliday’s Theme-Rheme on Google’s Privacy Policy Text: A Forensic Linguistics Research","authors":"Sabtra Lesmana, Sawirman Sawirman, Fajri Usman","doi":"10.31940/soshum.v12i2.161-170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research was aimed to reveal and explain the violations conducted by Google to its user privacy which is implied through its Privacy Policy Agreement statement by analyzing it with Theme and Rheme proposed by Halliday. This qualitative research was done by applying the documentation recording method in collecting data and the Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics as the basic theory. The result of the data was presented in the table analysis and in the form of descriptive interpretation. The result showed that Google build its clauses with the 4 types of theme construction. From the analyzed clauses, the dominantly built clause is the single constituent with marked theme where “We” is the mostly occurred subject. Yet, Google applied unmarked theme mosty in their clauses. With this dominant occurences of “We”, Google construe its existence as the authority holders of the w hole agreement. The researchers found that similar finite predicator appeared repeatedly such “collect” and “use” in building its clauses. These constitute Google’s strategy in order to force the user’s permission to let Google freely access their privacy. In addition, the operation of the conjunction “and”, extention, expansion and exemplificatory constituents represent the plentiful request of Google related to its user’s information. Those summarized the violation conducted by Google to its user’s privacy.","PeriodicalId":56206,"journal":{"name":"Soshum Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soshum Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31940/soshum.v12i2.161-170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research was aimed to reveal and explain the violations conducted by Google to its user privacy which is implied through its Privacy Policy Agreement statement by analyzing it with Theme and Rheme proposed by Halliday. This qualitative research was done by applying the documentation recording method in collecting data and the Halliday’s Systemic Functional Linguistics as the basic theory. The result of the data was presented in the table analysis and in the form of descriptive interpretation. The result showed that Google build its clauses with the 4 types of theme construction. From the analyzed clauses, the dominantly built clause is the single constituent with marked theme where “We” is the mostly occurred subject. Yet, Google applied unmarked theme mosty in their clauses. With this dominant occurences of “We”, Google construe its existence as the authority holders of the w hole agreement. The researchers found that similar finite predicator appeared repeatedly such “collect” and “use” in building its clauses. These constitute Google’s strategy in order to force the user’s permission to let Google freely access their privacy. In addition, the operation of the conjunction “and”, extention, expansion and exemplificatory constituents represent the plentiful request of Google related to its user’s information. Those summarized the violation conducted by Google to its user’s privacy.
韩礼德主述位在b谷歌隐私政策文本中的运用:法律语言学研究
本研究旨在通过运用韩礼德提出的主位和述位理论对b谷歌的隐私政策协议声明进行分析,揭示并解释b谷歌侵犯用户隐私的行为。本定性研究采用文献记录法收集资料,以韩礼德的系统功能语言学为基础理论。数据的结果以表分析和描述性解释的形式呈现。结果表明,b谷歌语用四种主位结构构建子句。从所分析的分句来看,占主导地位的分句是带有明显主位的单一成分,其中“我们”是出现最多的主语。b谷歌在子句中多采用无标记主题。由于“我们”一词占主导地位,b谷歌将自己的存在解释为whole协议的权威持有者。研究人员发现,“collect”和“use”等类似的有限谓词在其子句构建中反复出现。这些构成了谷歌的策略,目的是强制用户允许谷歌自由访问他们的隐私。此外,连词“和”、引申、展开、例证成分的使用,体现了b谷歌对用户信息的丰富需求。这些总结了b谷歌对其用户隐私的侵犯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信