Modern slavery in global value chains: A global factory and governance perspective

IF 2.2 2区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
D. Caspersz, Holly Cullen, M. Davis, D. Jog, F. McGaughey, D. Singhal, M. Sumner, Hinrich Voss
{"title":"Modern slavery in global value chains: A global factory and governance perspective","authors":"D. Caspersz, Holly Cullen, M. Davis, D. Jog, F. McGaughey, D. Singhal, M. Sumner, Hinrich Voss","doi":"10.1177/00221856211054586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘Modern slavery’ describes various forms of severe relational labour exploitation. In the realm of global value chains and global factories that are led by multinational enterprises, modern slavery encompasses practices such as forced labour and debt bondage. Multinational enterprises organise and orchestrate global value chains into global factories that are highly adaptive to market pressures and changes in the external environment. We employ the global factory framework to conceptualise when and how global value chains become more vulnerable to modern slavery. We argue that combinations of the three global value chain characteristics: complexity, appropriation arrangements, and obligation cascadence, jointly form an environment in which modern slavery can evolve and take root. The degree to which forms of modern slavery become visible and recognisable depends on the particular combination of these characteristics. External factors can moderate the relationship between these factors (e.g. involvement of non-governmental organisations) or exaggerate their effect (e.g. a pandemic).","PeriodicalId":47100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":"64 1","pages":"177 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856211054586","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

‘Modern slavery’ describes various forms of severe relational labour exploitation. In the realm of global value chains and global factories that are led by multinational enterprises, modern slavery encompasses practices such as forced labour and debt bondage. Multinational enterprises organise and orchestrate global value chains into global factories that are highly adaptive to market pressures and changes in the external environment. We employ the global factory framework to conceptualise when and how global value chains become more vulnerable to modern slavery. We argue that combinations of the three global value chain characteristics: complexity, appropriation arrangements, and obligation cascadence, jointly form an environment in which modern slavery can evolve and take root. The degree to which forms of modern slavery become visible and recognisable depends on the particular combination of these characteristics. External factors can moderate the relationship between these factors (e.g. involvement of non-governmental organisations) or exaggerate their effect (e.g. a pandemic).
全球价值链中的现代奴役:全球工厂和治理视角
“现代奴隶制”描述了各种形式的严重关系劳动剥削。在跨国企业领导的全球价值链和全球工厂领域,现代奴隶制包括强迫劳动和债役等做法。跨国企业将全球价值链组织和组织成全球工厂,这些工厂高度适应市场压力和外部环境的变化。我们采用全球工厂框架来概念化全球价值链何时以及如何变得更容易受到现代奴隶制的影响。我们认为,三种全球价值链特征的结合:复杂性、挪用安排和义务随意性,共同形成了一个现代奴隶制可以进化和扎根的环境。现代奴隶制形式的可见性和可识别性取决于这些特征的特定组合。外部因素可以缓和这些因素之间的关系(例如非政府组织的参与)或夸大其影响(例如大流行)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Relations
Journal of Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
21.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Relations takes a broad interdisciplinary approach to the subject of the world of work. It welcomes contributions which examine the way individuals, groups, organisations and institutions shape the employment relationship. The Journal takes the view that comprehensive understanding of industrial relations must take into account economic, political and social influences on the power of capital and labour, and the interactions between employers, workers, their collective organisations and the state.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信