Effects of Preoperative Gabapentin on Clinical Outcomes After Outpatient Midurethral Sling Placement

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
E. Welch, K. Dengler, A. DiCarlo-Meacham, J. Wheat, G. Stone, C. Olsen, W. V. von Pechmann
{"title":"Effects of Preoperative Gabapentin on Clinical Outcomes After Outpatient Midurethral Sling Placement","authors":"E. Welch, K. Dengler, A. DiCarlo-Meacham, J. Wheat, G. Stone, C. Olsen, W. V. von Pechmann","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This study aimed to evaluate transient urinary retention in women undergoing outpatient midurethral sling placement who received preoperative gabapentin (treated) versus those who did not (untreated). Secondary outcomes included unexpected admission rates, analgesic usage, time to discharge, and pain. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study including women who underwent outpatient midurethral sling placement from 2015 to 2019. Exclusion criteria included suprapubic catheter placement, planned overnight admission, abnormal preoperative postvoid residual volume, and prolonged postoperative catheterization. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate gabapentin usage and urinary retention after adjusting for patient characteristics. Results Three hundred two women met the inclusion criteria, with 19.5% experiencing urinary retention after midurethral sling placement. Women older than 65 years were more likely to have urinary retention than those aged 18–65 years (29.8% vs 17.6%, P = 0.054). Of treated participants, 26% had urinary retention versus 18% of untreated participants (P = 0.162). Adjusting for age, parity, pain, operative time, blood loss, sling type, analgesic, scopolamine patch, or hemostatic agent use, treated participants had 72% higher odds of urinary retention (adjusted odds ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.88–3.38; P = 0.113). There was no difference in unexpected admission, analgesic usage, time to discharge, or pain between groups. Conclusions One of 5 women had urinary retention after outpatient midurethral sling placement. Although no statistically significant difference was found in urinary retention between groups, the odds of urinary retention in the treated group were increased. Because there was no difference in pain, analgesic usage, or time to discharge between groups, investigation regarding gabapentin use for outpatient urogynecologic surgery is needed.","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"28 1","pages":"e39 - e43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate transient urinary retention in women undergoing outpatient midurethral sling placement who received preoperative gabapentin (treated) versus those who did not (untreated). Secondary outcomes included unexpected admission rates, analgesic usage, time to discharge, and pain. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study including women who underwent outpatient midurethral sling placement from 2015 to 2019. Exclusion criteria included suprapubic catheter placement, planned overnight admission, abnormal preoperative postvoid residual volume, and prolonged postoperative catheterization. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate gabapentin usage and urinary retention after adjusting for patient characteristics. Results Three hundred two women met the inclusion criteria, with 19.5% experiencing urinary retention after midurethral sling placement. Women older than 65 years were more likely to have urinary retention than those aged 18–65 years (29.8% vs 17.6%, P = 0.054). Of treated participants, 26% had urinary retention versus 18% of untreated participants (P = 0.162). Adjusting for age, parity, pain, operative time, blood loss, sling type, analgesic, scopolamine patch, or hemostatic agent use, treated participants had 72% higher odds of urinary retention (adjusted odds ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.88–3.38; P = 0.113). There was no difference in unexpected admission, analgesic usage, time to discharge, or pain between groups. Conclusions One of 5 women had urinary retention after outpatient midurethral sling placement. Although no statistically significant difference was found in urinary retention between groups, the odds of urinary retention in the treated group were increased. Because there was no difference in pain, analgesic usage, or time to discharge between groups, investigation regarding gabapentin use for outpatient urogynecologic surgery is needed.
术前加巴喷丁对门诊中尿道吊带置入后临床疗效的影响
目的本研究旨在评估门诊中尿道吊带置入术前接受加巴喷丁治疗(治疗)和未接受加巴喷丁治疗(未治疗)的妇女的短暂性尿潴留。次要结果包括意外入院率、镇痛药的使用、出院时间和疼痛。方法这是一项回顾性队列研究,包括2015年至2019年接受门诊尿道中段吊带置入术的女性。排除标准包括耻骨上导管放置、计划过夜入院、术前异常的术后残余容量和术后延长导管插入术。在对患者特征进行调整后,进行Logistic回归以评估加巴喷丁的使用和尿潴留。结果符合入选标准的妇女有302例,其中19.5%的妇女在中尿道悬吊术后出现尿潴留。65岁以上的女性比18-65岁的女性更有可能出现尿潴留(29.8%对17.6%,P=0.054)。在接受治疗的参与者中,26%的参与者出现尿潴留,而未接受治疗的与会者为18%(P=0.062)。调整年龄、产次、疼痛、手术时间、失血、吊带类型、止痛药、东莨菪碱贴片或止血剂的使用,接受治疗的参与者尿潴留的几率高出72%(调整后的比值比为1.72;95%置信区间为0.88–3.38;P=0.113)。两组之间在意外入院、镇痛药使用、出院时间或疼痛方面没有差异。结论门诊放置尿道中段吊带后,5名女性中有1名出现尿潴留。尽管两组之间的尿潴留没有发现统计学上的显著差异,但治疗组的尿潴留几率增加了。由于两组之间在疼痛、镇痛药使用或出院时间方面没有差异,因此需要对加巴喷丁在门诊泌尿生殖外科手术中的使用进行调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信