M. Michalon
{"title":"Tourism, Ethnicity, and Territory Appropriation in Post-Dictatorial Myanmar: The Case of Inle Lake Region","authors":"M. Michalon","doi":"10.1353/jbs.2021.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on Inle Lake region, located on the very western edge of the Shan plateau, a stone’s throw from the Irrawaddy valley. It has a peculiar situation: it is neither part of the center nor a remote periphery; neither part of the Bamar heartland nor a core Shan territory. It is a transitional zone, a “liminal space” (Douglas 2013:192) between Bamar and Tai worlds. The liminality is not only spatial: it reaches much deeper; it opens spaces of uncertainty and potential and it “points to in-between situations and conditions where established structures are dislocated, hierarchies reversed, and traditional settings of authority possibly endangered” (Mälksoo 2012). This “in-between” region is therefore a prime vantage point to observe the complexity of the transformations of Myanmar. What we call “Inle Lake region” comprises (1) the Nyaungshwe valley and the three lakes that lie at its bottom, along a north–south axis: Inle, Samkar, and Mobye, all connected by the Balu River; (2) the first rows of hills that line the valley (figure 1). This entity features a double coherence. From a topographical point of view, it encompasses highland and lowlands, upstream and downstream, complementary ecosystems. From a social point of view, it brings together The Journal of Burma Studies Vol. 25, No. 1 (2021), pp. 89–134 © 2021 Center for Burma Studies","PeriodicalId":53638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burma Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"134 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jbs.2021.0004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burma Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jbs.2021.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
缅甸后独裁时代的旅游、族群与领土占有:以茵莱湖地区为例
本文关注的是位于掸邦高原西部边缘的因乐湖地区,该地区距离伊洛瓦底江流域仅一箭之遥。它有一个特殊的情况:它既不是中心的一部分,也不是遥远的外围;既不是巴马中心地带的一部分,也不是掸邦的核心地区。它是一个过渡地带,是巴马和泰世界之间的“临界空间”(Douglas 2013:192)。界限不仅是空间的:它延伸得更深;它打开了不确定性和潜力的空间,并“指出了既定结构错位、等级制度颠倒和传统权威设置可能受到威胁的情况和条件之间的关系”(Mälksoo,2012年)。因此,这个“中间地带”是观察缅甸转型复杂性的主要有利位置。我们所说的“Inle湖地区”包括(1)Nyaungshwe山谷和位于其底部的三个湖泊,沿着南北轴线:Inle、Samkar和Mobye,所有湖泊都由巴鲁河连接;(2) 沿着山谷排列的第一排山丘(图1)。这个实体具有双重连贯性。从地形的角度来看,它包括高地和低地、上游和下游、互补的生态系统。从社会角度来看,它汇集了《缅甸研究杂志》第25卷第1期(2021),第89–134页©2021缅甸研究中心
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。