Mechanical power thresholds during mechanical ventilation: An experimental study.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Federica Romitti, Mattia Busana, Maria Michela Palumbo, Matteo Bonifazi, Lorenzo Giosa, Francesco Vassalli, Alessandro Gatta, Francesca Collino, Irene Steinberg, Simone Gattarello, Stefano Lazzari, Paola Palermo, Ahmed Nasr, Ann-Kathrin Gersmann, Annika Richter, Peter Herrmann, Onnen Moerer, Leif Saager, Luigi Camporota, John J Marini, Michael Quintel, Konrad Meissner, Luciano Gattinoni
{"title":"Mechanical power thresholds during mechanical ventilation: An experimental study.","authors":"Federica Romitti,&nbsp;Mattia Busana,&nbsp;Maria Michela Palumbo,&nbsp;Matteo Bonifazi,&nbsp;Lorenzo Giosa,&nbsp;Francesco Vassalli,&nbsp;Alessandro Gatta,&nbsp;Francesca Collino,&nbsp;Irene Steinberg,&nbsp;Simone Gattarello,&nbsp;Stefano Lazzari,&nbsp;Paola Palermo,&nbsp;Ahmed Nasr,&nbsp;Ann-Kathrin Gersmann,&nbsp;Annika Richter,&nbsp;Peter Herrmann,&nbsp;Onnen Moerer,&nbsp;Leif Saager,&nbsp;Luigi Camporota,&nbsp;John J Marini,&nbsp;Michael Quintel,&nbsp;Konrad Meissner,&nbsp;Luciano Gattinoni","doi":"10.14814/phy2.15225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The extent of ventilator-induced lung injury may be related to the intensity of mechanical ventilation--expressed as mechanical power. In the present study, we investigated whether there is a safe threshold, below which lung damage is absent. Three groups of six healthy pigs (29.5 ± 2.5 kg) were ventilated prone for 48 h at mechanical power of 3, 7, or 12 J/min. Strain never exceeded 1.0. PEEP was set at 4 cmH<sub>2</sub> O. Lung volumes were measured every 12 h; respiratory, hemodynamics, and gas exchange variables every 6. End-experiment histological findings were compared with a control group of eight pigs which did not undergo mechanical ventilation. Functional residual capacity decreased by 10.4% ± 10.6% and 8.1% ± 12.1% in the 7 J and 12 J groups (p = 0.017, p < 0.001) but not in the 3 J group (+1.7% ± 17.7%, p = 0.941). In 3 J group, lung elastance, PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaCO<sub>2</sub> were worse compared to 7 J and 12 J groups (all p < 0.001), due to lower ventilation-perfusion ratio (0.54 ± 0.13, 1.00 ± 0.25, 1.78 ± 0.36 respectively, p < 0.001). The lung weight was lower (p < 0.001) in the controls (6.56 ± 0.90 g/kg) compared to 3, 7, and 12 J groups (12.9 ± 3.0, 16.5 ± 2.9, and 15.0 ± 4.1 g/kg, respectively). The wet-to-dry ratio was 5.38 ± 0.26 in controls, 5.73 ± 0.52 in 3 J, 5.99 ± 0.38 in 7 J, and 6.13 ± 0.59 in 12 J group (p = 0.03). Vascular congestion was more extensive in the 7 J and 12 J compared to 3 J and control groups. Mechanical ventilation (with anesthesia/paralysis) increase lung weight, and worsen lung histology, regardless of the mechanical power. Ventilating at 3 J/min led to better anatomical variables than at 7 and 12 J/min but worsened the physiological values.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":"e15225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8957661/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The extent of ventilator-induced lung injury may be related to the intensity of mechanical ventilation--expressed as mechanical power. In the present study, we investigated whether there is a safe threshold, below which lung damage is absent. Three groups of six healthy pigs (29.5 ± 2.5 kg) were ventilated prone for 48 h at mechanical power of 3, 7, or 12 J/min. Strain never exceeded 1.0. PEEP was set at 4 cmH2 O. Lung volumes were measured every 12 h; respiratory, hemodynamics, and gas exchange variables every 6. End-experiment histological findings were compared with a control group of eight pigs which did not undergo mechanical ventilation. Functional residual capacity decreased by 10.4% ± 10.6% and 8.1% ± 12.1% in the 7 J and 12 J groups (p = 0.017, p < 0.001) but not in the 3 J group (+1.7% ± 17.7%, p = 0.941). In 3 J group, lung elastance, PaO2 and PaCO2 were worse compared to 7 J and 12 J groups (all p < 0.001), due to lower ventilation-perfusion ratio (0.54 ± 0.13, 1.00 ± 0.25, 1.78 ± 0.36 respectively, p < 0.001). The lung weight was lower (p < 0.001) in the controls (6.56 ± 0.90 g/kg) compared to 3, 7, and 12 J groups (12.9 ± 3.0, 16.5 ± 2.9, and 15.0 ± 4.1 g/kg, respectively). The wet-to-dry ratio was 5.38 ± 0.26 in controls, 5.73 ± 0.52 in 3 J, 5.99 ± 0.38 in 7 J, and 6.13 ± 0.59 in 12 J group (p = 0.03). Vascular congestion was more extensive in the 7 J and 12 J compared to 3 J and control groups. Mechanical ventilation (with anesthesia/paralysis) increase lung weight, and worsen lung histology, regardless of the mechanical power. Ventilating at 3 J/min led to better anatomical variables than at 7 and 12 J/min but worsened the physiological values.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

机械通气时机械功率阈值的实验研究
呼吸机引起的肺损伤程度可能与机械通气强度有关,以机械功率表示。在本研究中,我们研究了是否存在一个安全阈值,低于此阈值不会造成肺损伤。每组6头健康猪(29.5±2.5 kg),分别在3、7、12 J/min的机械功率下俯卧通气48 h。应变从未超过1.0。PEEP设定为4 cmH2O。每12 h测量一次肺体积;呼吸,血液动力学,和气体交换变量每6分钟。将实验结束时的组织学结果与未进行机械通气的对照组8头猪进行比较。7 J组和12 J组功能残量分别下降10.4%±10.6%和8.1%±12.1% (p = 0.017, p < 0.001),而3 J组无明显下降(+1.7%±17.7%,p = 0.941)。3j组肺弹性、PaO2、PaCO2较7j、12j组差(p < 0.001),通气灌注比较低(分别为0.54±0.13、1.00±0.25、1.78±0.36,p < 0.001)。对照组肺质量(6.56±0.90 g/kg)低于3、7、12 J组(分别为12.9±3.0、16.5±2.9、15.0±4.1 g/kg) (p < 0.001)。对照组的干湿比为5.38±0.26,3 J组为5.73±0.52,7 J组为5.99±0.38,12 J组为6.13±0.59 (p = 0.03)。与3j和对照组相比,7j和12j的血管充血更广泛。机械通气(伴麻醉/麻痹)增加肺重量,加重肺组织学,与机械功率无关。与7和12 J/min相比,3 J/min通气的解剖指标更好,但生理指标更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信