Discussion of the concept of ambidexterity in process management

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
E-Mentor Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.15219/em98.1595
P. Śliż, Marek Szelągowski
{"title":"Discussion of the concept of ambidexterity in process management","authors":"P. Śliż, Marek Szelągowski","doi":"10.15219/em98.1595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses the issue of differences in the translation of the term ambidexterity, which is equated in the Polish literature with such terms as ambidextrousness, two-handedness, double-agility, ambivalence, or duality. The choice of the Polish term is of significance for intuitive understanding of this phenomenon by both researchers and non-specialists, including practitioners. The main objective is to systematize the terminological issues and thus propose a Polish translation of the term ambidexterity, in the discipline of management and quality sciences, in the sub-discipline of process management. Methods such as bibliometric analysis and a review of the Polish literature on the subject, using the Publish or Perish database, were used to achieve the main objective. The results of the study and the conclusions formulated contribute to the current knowledge regarding the discussion on the Polish equivalent of the term ambidexterity. In the Authors' opinion, the concept most fully and accurately reflecting the context of the contradiction between exploitative and exploratory activities in process management, within the sphere of the discussed BPM issues, is duality. The article is original in nature because, even if partially, it fills the cognitive gap concerning the sparsity of publications addressing the integrative view of ambidexterity and BPM.","PeriodicalId":42136,"journal":{"name":"E-Mentor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Mentor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15219/em98.1595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of differences in the translation of the term ambidexterity, which is equated in the Polish literature with such terms as ambidextrousness, two-handedness, double-agility, ambivalence, or duality. The choice of the Polish term is of significance for intuitive understanding of this phenomenon by both researchers and non-specialists, including practitioners. The main objective is to systematize the terminological issues and thus propose a Polish translation of the term ambidexterity, in the discipline of management and quality sciences, in the sub-discipline of process management. Methods such as bibliometric analysis and a review of the Polish literature on the subject, using the Publish or Perish database, were used to achieve the main objective. The results of the study and the conclusions formulated contribute to the current knowledge regarding the discussion on the Polish equivalent of the term ambidexterity. In the Authors' opinion, the concept most fully and accurately reflecting the context of the contradiction between exploitative and exploratory activities in process management, within the sphere of the discussed BPM issues, is duality. The article is original in nature because, even if partially, it fills the cognitive gap concerning the sparsity of publications addressing the integrative view of ambidexterity and BPM.
过程管理中的双元性概念探讨
这篇文章解决了翻译歧义的问题,在波兰文学中,这等同于双灵巧性、双手性、双敏捷性、矛盾心理或二元性。选择波兰术语对于研究人员和非专业人士(包括从业人员)对这一现象的直观理解具有重要意义。主要目标是将术语问题系统化,从而在管理和质量科学的学科中,在过程管理的子学科中,提出术语“两面性”的波兰语翻译。为了实现主要目标,采用了诸如文献计量学分析和使用“发表或灭亡”数据库对波兰关于该主题的文献进行审查等方法。研究的结果和结论的制定有助于目前的知识关于波兰等效的术语双灵巧的讨论。在作者看来,在讨论的BPM问题范围内,最充分、最准确地反映流程管理中剥削性活动和探索性活动之间矛盾的背景的概念是二元性。这篇文章本质上是原创的,因为,即使是部分地,它填补了关于解决双灵巧性和BPM集成视图的出版物的稀缺性的认知空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
E-Mentor
E-Mentor EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信