Climate-smart peatland management and the potential for synergies between food security and climate change objectives in Indonesia

IF 8.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Massimo Lupascu , Pierre Taillardat , Sigit D. Sasmito , F. Agus , Daniel Mudiyarso , Sorain J. Ramchunder , Hesti L. Tata , David Taylor
{"title":"Climate-smart peatland management and the potential for synergies between food security and climate change objectives in Indonesia","authors":"Massimo Lupascu ,&nbsp;Pierre Taillardat ,&nbsp;Sigit D. Sasmito ,&nbsp;F. Agus ,&nbsp;Daniel Mudiyarso ,&nbsp;Sorain J. Ramchunder ,&nbsp;Hesti L. Tata ,&nbsp;David Taylor","doi":"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tropical peatlands lie at a nexus of competing sustainable development demands of enhancing food security, mitigating climate change, improving resilience and supporting rural livelihoods. Meeting United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires balancing these various demands. Progress in meeting SDGs has been slow in low to middle income countries because of difficulties in identifying and quantifying the trade offs associated with natural resource exploitation, including on extensive areas of tropical peatlands.</p><p>Here, by using secondary data from the literature, Indonesian and international agencies, we examine how land-use allocation in Indonesia has developed over the last three decades by investigating trends of key food and woody crops (oil palm and rubber) and evaluate the role that peatland provinces have played in food security and climate forcing. Overall, food crop production has been marginal in peatland provinces compared to monoculture woody crops, with the latter associated with increased carbon emissions from land use, land-use change, and forestry (LULUCF) over the last thirty years. Our analysis shows that synergies between responses to looming food security and climate change crises can also promote less damaging forms of tropical peatland management. For instance, the conversion of degraded shallow peatlands to agroecological practices (e.g., paludiculture) can be promoted. However, we stress that peatland conservation and restoration must remain the top priority. Impediments due to lack of a common definition for peatland and planning/management units, the use of multiple sectoral maps by different government agencies and uncoordinated sectoral policy targets can, however, hinder the implementation of less damaging peatland management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":328,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102731"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Change","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378023000973","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tropical peatlands lie at a nexus of competing sustainable development demands of enhancing food security, mitigating climate change, improving resilience and supporting rural livelihoods. Meeting United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires balancing these various demands. Progress in meeting SDGs has been slow in low to middle income countries because of difficulties in identifying and quantifying the trade offs associated with natural resource exploitation, including on extensive areas of tropical peatlands.

Here, by using secondary data from the literature, Indonesian and international agencies, we examine how land-use allocation in Indonesia has developed over the last three decades by investigating trends of key food and woody crops (oil palm and rubber) and evaluate the role that peatland provinces have played in food security and climate forcing. Overall, food crop production has been marginal in peatland provinces compared to monoculture woody crops, with the latter associated with increased carbon emissions from land use, land-use change, and forestry (LULUCF) over the last thirty years. Our analysis shows that synergies between responses to looming food security and climate change crises can also promote less damaging forms of tropical peatland management. For instance, the conversion of degraded shallow peatlands to agroecological practices (e.g., paludiculture) can be promoted. However, we stress that peatland conservation and restoration must remain the top priority. Impediments due to lack of a common definition for peatland and planning/management units, the use of multiple sectoral maps by different government agencies and uncoordinated sectoral policy targets can, however, hinder the implementation of less damaging peatland management.

气候智慧型泥炭地管理以及印度尼西亚粮食安全和气候变化目标之间协同作用的潜力
热带泥炭地处于加强粮食安全、减缓气候变化、提高抵御力和支持农村生计等相互竞争的可持续发展需求的连接点。实现联合国可持续发展目标(sdg)需要平衡这些不同的需求。中低收入国家在实现可持续发展目标方面进展缓慢,原因是难以确定和量化与自然资源开发有关的权衡,包括对大面积热带泥炭地的开发。在这里,通过使用文献、印度尼西亚和国际机构的二手数据,我们通过调查主要粮食和木本作物(油棕和橡胶)的趋势,研究了过去三十年来印度尼西亚土地利用分配的发展情况,并评估了泥炭地省份在粮食安全和气候强迫中所起的作用。总体而言,与单一栽培木本作物相比,泥炭地省份的粮食作物产量一直处于边缘,后者与过去30年土地利用、土地利用变化和林业(LULUCF)造成的碳排放增加有关。我们的分析表明,应对迫在眉睫的粮食安全和气候变化危机之间的协同作用也可以促进危害较小的热带泥炭地管理形式。例如,可以促进将退化的浅泥炭地转变为农业生态做法(例如古农业)。然而,我们强调,泥炭地的保护和恢复必须仍然是最优先事项。然而,由于缺乏泥炭地和规划/管理单位的共同定义、不同政府机构使用多部门地图和不协调的部门政策目标等因素造成的障碍,可能阻碍实施损害较小的泥炭地管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Environmental Change
Global Environmental Change 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
146
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Global Environmental Change is a prestigious international journal that publishes articles of high quality, both theoretically and empirically rigorous. The journal aims to contribute to the understanding of global environmental change from the perspectives of human and policy dimensions. Specifically, it considers global environmental change as the result of processes occurring at the local level, but with wide-ranging impacts on various spatial, temporal, and socio-political scales. In terms of content, the journal seeks articles with a strong social science component. This includes research that examines the societal drivers and consequences of environmental change, as well as social and policy processes that aim to address these challenges. While the journal covers a broad range of topics, including biodiversity and ecosystem services, climate, coasts, food systems, land use and land cover, oceans, urban areas, and water resources, it also welcomes contributions that investigate the drivers, consequences, and management of other areas affected by environmental change. Overall, Global Environmental Change encourages research that deepens our understanding of the complex interactions between human activities and the environment, with the goal of informing policy and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信