Root biomass and altitude jointly regulate the response of topsoil organic carbon density to severe degradation of high-altitude alpine meadows

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Hongqin Li, Huimin Geng, Zhitao Zhang, Lubei Yi, Jianhao Wang, Fawei Zhang
{"title":"Root biomass and altitude jointly regulate the response of topsoil organic carbon density to severe degradation of high-altitude alpine meadows","authors":"Hongqin Li,&nbsp;Huimin Geng,&nbsp;Zhitao Zhang,&nbsp;Lubei Yi,&nbsp;Jianhao Wang,&nbsp;Fawei Zhang","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grassland degradation can substantially reduce soil carbon sequestration capacity. However, the effects of grassland degradation on soil organic carbon (SOC) density remain unquantified in high-altitude alpine meadows. In this study, the response and controlling mechanisms of topsoil (0–20 cm) organic carbon were explored in a field survey involving 11 pairs of healthy versus severely degraded plots of high-altitude (above 4000 m) alpine meadows, as well as three short-term (3–5 years) fencing restoration projects, across the source of the Yellow River in August of 2020 and 2021. The results showed that 0–20 cm root biomass, SOC content (SCC), and density (SCD) of healthy meadows averaged 533.7 ± 291.9 g/m<sup>2</sup> (mean ± S.D), 21.17 ± 9.36 g/kg, and 4.54 ± 1.64 kg C/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Root biomass, SCC, and SCD were markedly reduced by 63.0%, 33.2%, and 17.6% in severely degraded grassland compared with healthy meadows. The SCC and SCD averaged 7.92 ± 2.21 g/kg and 2.2 ± 0.9 kg C/m<sup>2</sup> in fencing plots, respectively, and were not significantly different from severely degraded meadows, suggesting a limited improvement in SOC from short-term fencing restoration. Analysis of a piecewise structural equation model revealed that the effect of degradation on SCD (indicated by the difference in SCD between paired healthy and degraded meadows) was jointly regulated by the differential surface root biomass and site altitude, with a total positive effect of 0.39 and 0.26, respectively. Our findings indicate the losses of topsoil organic carbon stock caused by grassland degradation are root biomass- and altitude-dependent, supporting the notion that antecedent prevention of degradation, more than subsequent restoration, should be the highest priority in the adaptive management of alpine meadows in harsh high-altitude regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":"79 1","pages":"69-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12621","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grassland degradation can substantially reduce soil carbon sequestration capacity. However, the effects of grassland degradation on soil organic carbon (SOC) density remain unquantified in high-altitude alpine meadows. In this study, the response and controlling mechanisms of topsoil (0–20 cm) organic carbon were explored in a field survey involving 11 pairs of healthy versus severely degraded plots of high-altitude (above 4000 m) alpine meadows, as well as three short-term (3–5 years) fencing restoration projects, across the source of the Yellow River in August of 2020 and 2021. The results showed that 0–20 cm root biomass, SOC content (SCC), and density (SCD) of healthy meadows averaged 533.7 ± 291.9 g/m2 (mean ± S.D), 21.17 ± 9.36 g/kg, and 4.54 ± 1.64 kg C/m2, respectively. Root biomass, SCC, and SCD were markedly reduced by 63.0%, 33.2%, and 17.6% in severely degraded grassland compared with healthy meadows. The SCC and SCD averaged 7.92 ± 2.21 g/kg and 2.2 ± 0.9 kg C/m2 in fencing plots, respectively, and were not significantly different from severely degraded meadows, suggesting a limited improvement in SOC from short-term fencing restoration. Analysis of a piecewise structural equation model revealed that the effect of degradation on SCD (indicated by the difference in SCD between paired healthy and degraded meadows) was jointly regulated by the differential surface root biomass and site altitude, with a total positive effect of 0.39 and 0.26, respectively. Our findings indicate the losses of topsoil organic carbon stock caused by grassland degradation are root biomass- and altitude-dependent, supporting the notion that antecedent prevention of degradation, more than subsequent restoration, should be the highest priority in the adaptive management of alpine meadows in harsh high-altitude regions.

根系生物量和海拔共同调节表层土壤有机碳密度对高寒草甸严重退化的响应
草地退化会大大降低土壤固碳能力。然而,草地退化对高海拔高山草甸土壤有机碳密度的影响仍未量化。本研究于 2020 年 8 月和 2021 年 8 月在黄河源头对 11 对高海拔(4000 米以上)高寒草甸健康地块与严重退化地块以及 3 个短期(3-5 年)围栏恢复项目进行了实地调查,探讨了表层土壤(0-20 厘米)有机碳的响应和控制机制。结果显示,健康草甸的 0-20 厘米根系生物量、SOC 含量(SCC)和密度(SCD)平均值分别为 533.7 ± 291.9 克/平方米(平均值 ± S.D)、21.17 ± 9.36 克/千克和 4.54 ± 1.64 千克 C/平方米。与健康草地相比,严重退化草地的根生物量、SCC 和 SCD 显著减少了 63.0%、33.2% 和 17.6%。围栏地块的 SCC 和 SCD 平均值分别为 7.92 ± 2.21 g/kg 和 2.2 ± 0.9 kg C/m2,与严重退化草地没有显著差异,表明短期围栏恢复对 SOC 的改善有限。片断结构方程模型分析表明,退化对 SCD 的影响(以配对健康草地和退化草地之间的 SCD 差值表示)受地表根系生物量差异和地点海拔的共同调节,总的正效应分别为 0.39 和 0.26。我们的研究结果表明,草地退化造成的表层土壤有机碳储量损失与根系生物量和海拔高度有关,这支持了这样一种观点,即在严酷的高海拔地区对高山草甸进行适应性管理时,最优先考虑的是事前预防退化,而不是事后恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信