Prior Knowledge Elicitation: The Past, Present, and Future

IF 4.9 2区 数学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
P. Mikkola, Osvaldo A. Martin, Suyog H. Chandramouli, M. Hartmann, O. A. Pla, Owen Thomas, Henri Pesonen, J. Corander, Aki Vehtari, Samuel Kaski, Paul-Christian Burkner, Arto Klami
{"title":"Prior Knowledge Elicitation: The Past, Present, and Future","authors":"P. Mikkola, Osvaldo A. Martin, Suyog H. Chandramouli, M. Hartmann, O. A. Pla, Owen Thomas, Henri Pesonen, J. Corander, Aki Vehtari, Samuel Kaski, Paul-Christian Burkner, Arto Klami","doi":"10.1214/23-ba1381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Specification of the prior distribution for a Bayesian model is a central part of the Bayesian workflow for data analysis, but it is often difficult even for statistical experts. In principle, prior elicitation transforms domain knowledge of various kinds into well-defined prior distributions, and offers a solution to the prior specification problem. In practice, however, we are still fairly far from having usable prior elicitation tools that could significantly influence the way we build probabilistic models in academia and industry. We lack elicitation methods that integrate well into the Bayesian workflow and perform elicitation efficiently in terms of costs of time and effort. We even lack a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding different facets of the prior elicitation problem. Why are we not widely using prior elicitation? We analyse the state of the art by identifying a range of key aspects of prior knowledge elicitation, from properties of the modelling task and the nature of the priors to the form of interaction with the expert. The existing prior elicitation literature is reviewed and categorized in these terms. This allows recognizing under-studied directions in prior elicitation research, finally leading to a proposal of several new avenues to improve prior elicitation methodology.","PeriodicalId":55398,"journal":{"name":"Bayesian Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bayesian Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1214/23-ba1381","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Specification of the prior distribution for a Bayesian model is a central part of the Bayesian workflow for data analysis, but it is often difficult even for statistical experts. In principle, prior elicitation transforms domain knowledge of various kinds into well-defined prior distributions, and offers a solution to the prior specification problem. In practice, however, we are still fairly far from having usable prior elicitation tools that could significantly influence the way we build probabilistic models in academia and industry. We lack elicitation methods that integrate well into the Bayesian workflow and perform elicitation efficiently in terms of costs of time and effort. We even lack a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding different facets of the prior elicitation problem. Why are we not widely using prior elicitation? We analyse the state of the art by identifying a range of key aspects of prior knowledge elicitation, from properties of the modelling task and the nature of the priors to the form of interaction with the expert. The existing prior elicitation literature is reviewed and categorized in these terms. This allows recognizing under-studied directions in prior elicitation research, finally leading to a proposal of several new avenues to improve prior elicitation methodology.
先验知识的启发:过去,现在和未来
贝叶斯模型的先验分布规范是贝叶斯数据分析工作流程的核心部分,但即使对统计专家来说,这也常常是困难的。原则上,先验启发将各种领域知识转化为定义良好的先验分布,并为先验规范问题提供了解决方案。然而,在实践中,我们仍然远远没有可用的先验启发工具,这些工具可以显著影响我们在学术界和工业界构建概率模型的方式。我们缺乏很好地集成到贝叶斯工作流程中的启发方法,并且在时间和精力成本方面有效地执行启发。我们甚至缺乏一个全面的理论框架来理解先验启发问题的不同方面。为什么我们没有广泛使用先验启发?我们通过识别先验知识引出的一系列关键方面,从建模任务的属性和先验的性质到与专家互动的形式,来分析当前的技术状况。现有的先验启发文献在这些方面进行了回顾和分类。这使得在先验启发研究中认识到研究不足的方向,最终导致提出几个新的途径来改进先验启发方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bayesian Analysis
Bayesian Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
13.60%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bayesian Analysis is an electronic journal of the International Society for Bayesian Analysis. It seeks to publish a wide range of articles that demonstrate or discuss Bayesian methods in some theoretical or applied context. The journal welcomes submissions involving presentation of new computational and statistical methods; critical reviews and discussions of existing approaches; historical perspectives; description of important scientific or policy application areas; case studies; and methods for experimental design, data collection, data sharing, or data mining. Evaluation of submissions is based on importance of content and effectiveness of communication. Discussion papers are typically chosen by the Editor in Chief, or suggested by an Editor, among the regular submissions. In addition, the Journal encourages individual authors to submit manuscripts for consideration as discussion papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信