The moderating role of self-control between impulsiveness and risky decision-making among college students with pathological internet use

中华行为医学与脑科学杂志 Pub Date : 2019-10-20 DOI:10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-6554.2019.10.013

X. Tu, Yixuan Lin, Jia-jun Yan, Guohua Zhang

{"title":"The moderating role of self-control between impulsiveness and risky decision-making among college students with pathological internet use","authors":"X. Tu, Yixuan Lin, Jia-jun Yan, Guohua Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-6554.2019.10.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the relationship between impulsiveness and risky decision-making among college students with pathological internet use (PIU), as well as the moderating role of self-control. \n \n \nMethods \nTotally 542 undergraduates anonymously completed the Internet Addiction Test (IAT), Chinese Version of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Risk Preference Questionnaire, Self-Control Scale. \n \n \nResults \n(1)In loss frames, the scores of risky decision-making with high (20.26±4.83) and medium (20.40±5.53) level of impulsiveness among college students with PIU significantly were higher than those with low (18.92±5.03) level of impulsiveness (F(2, 323)=3.79, P<0.05, η2=0.02). (2)There was a significant negative correlation between impulsiveness (60.68±10.40) and self-control (55.56±9.07)(r=-0.60, P<0.01). And there was a significant positive correlations between impulsiveness and risky decision-making in loss frames (20.12±5.26)(r=0.13, P<0.05). The risky decision-making in gain frames (17.17±4.38) was positively correlated with that in loss frames (r=0.52, P<0.01). (3)Self-control played a moderating role in the association between impulsiveness and risky decision-making in loss frames (β=0.13, t=2.31, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nIn loss frames, impulsiveness is positively related with risky decision-making, and self-control plays a moderating role between impulsiveness and risky decision-making in loss frames among college students with PIU. \n \n \nKey words: \nCollege students; Pathological internet use; Impulsiveness; Risky decision-making; Self-control","PeriodicalId":9940,"journal":{"name":"中华行为医学与脑科学杂志","volume":"28 1","pages":"930-934"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华行为医学与脑科学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-6554.2019.10.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the relationship between impulsiveness and risky decision-making among college students with pathological internet use (PIU), as well as the moderating role of self-control. Methods Totally 542 undergraduates anonymously completed the Internet Addiction Test (IAT), Chinese Version of Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Risk Preference Questionnaire, Self-Control Scale. Results (1)In loss frames, the scores of risky decision-making with high (20.26±4.83) and medium (20.40±5.53) level of impulsiveness among college students with PIU significantly were higher than those with low (18.92±5.03) level of impulsiveness (F(2, 323)=3.79, P<0.05, η2=0.02). (2)There was a significant negative correlation between impulsiveness (60.68±10.40) and self-control (55.56±9.07)(r=-0.60, P<0.01). And there was a significant positive correlations between impulsiveness and risky decision-making in loss frames (20.12±5.26)(r=0.13, P<0.05). The risky decision-making in gain frames (17.17±4.38) was positively correlated with that in loss frames (r=0.52, P<0.01). (3)Self-control played a moderating role in the association between impulsiveness and risky decision-making in loss frames (β=0.13, t=2.31, P<0.05). Conclusion In loss frames, impulsiveness is positively related with risky decision-making, and self-control plays a moderating role between impulsiveness and risky decision-making in loss frames among college students with PIU. Key words: College students; Pathological internet use; Impulsiveness; Risky decision-making; Self-control

查看原文本刊更多论文

自我控制对病态网络使用大学生冲动与风险决策的调节作用

目的探讨病理性网络使用（PIU）大学生冲动与风险决策的关系，以及自我控制的调节作用。方法542名大学生匿名完成网络成瘾测试（IAT）、Barratt冲动量表中文版、风险偏好问卷、自我控制量表。结果（1）在损失框中，PIU大学生冲动性水平高（20.26±4.83）和中等（20.40±5.53）的风险决策得分显著高于冲动性水平低（18.92±5.03）的大学生（F（2233）=3.79，P<0.05，η2=0.02）。（2）冲动性（60.68±10.40）与自制力（55.56±9.07）呈显著负相关（r=-0.60，P<0.01）。在损失框中冲动性与风险决策呈显著正相关（20.12±5.26）（r=0.13，P<0.05）（r=0.52，P<0.01）。（3）自我控制在损失框中对冲动性与风险决策的相关性起调节作用（β=0.13，t=2.31，P<0.05），在PIU大学生的损失框架中，自我控制在冲动和风险决策之间起着调节作用。关键词：大学生；病理性互联网使用；冲动；风险决策；自我控制

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

中华行为医学与脑科学杂志

自引率

0.00%

发文量

8131

期刊介绍： "Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science" (CN 37-1468/R, ISSN 1674-6554) is a national academic journal under the supervision of the National Health Commission, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and Jining Medical College. The journal was founded in June 1992 and was formerly known as "Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine" (1992-1993) and "Chinese Behavioral Medical Science" (1994-2008). In 2009, it was renamed "Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science" with the approval of the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television. The purpose of "Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science" is to implement the health and health policies of the Party and the State, implement the principle of combining theory with practice and popularization and improvement, and reflect the major progress in the theory and practical application of behavioral medicine and brain science in my country. It publishes academic papers and scientific research results in the field of behavioral medicine and brain science in my country, and has columns such as monographs/reviews, basic research, clinical research, health prevention, methods and techniques, psychological behavior and evaluation, and systematic evaluation.