Learning social literacy

IF 1.2 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Tony Eaude
{"title":"Learning social literacy","authors":"Tony Eaude","doi":"10.1080/1364436X.2021.2013413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"how these individual teachers are ‘in line with current trends and practices socially, but their professional context is in a different place which is at odds with, but not outside of, these influences.’ (p. 63). As Gillespie writes (p. 20), ‘it is clear that one’s past and the relationship between self and family affects the ways in which one identifies oneself and, in turn, how spirituality, or the spiritual aspect of one’s life, is understood,’ though more examination of the varying influences of community, culture and traditions would have been valuable. The focus is on teachers’ views rather than children’s. However, the emphasis on relationships, connectedness and the search for identity and belonging, with children having multiple identities and a less certain sense of belonging, fits well with recent trends in work on children’s spirituality and the importance of relational pedagogies. While a short book inevitably can cover only a limited range of issues in a very complex area, future work could usefully fill out the arguments made. For instance, while there are numerous ways in which the teachers’ spiritualities and professionalism ‘misalign’ (p. 29), specific examples and consideration of different views of professionalism would strengthen the claims being made. More discussion of the implications throughout the school curriculum and beyond – and the dilemmas that this poses – and the suggestion, which I found somewhat surprising, that these teachers associated spirituality with a call to social action, outside as well as within their classrooms, would similarly help to fill out the case presented. While Spirituality in Education is well written, thoughtful and nuanced, a brief conclusion to highlight the key points would have been helpful. It tries to link the academic discourse and how practising teachers think about spirituality and how to nurture this; and mostly does so successfully, though. Gillespie describes clearly how understandings of spirituality have changed from being almost exclusively linked with religion to a process in which everyone, whatever their age or background, is engaged and draws out the potentially radical nature of spirituality and how this challenges many of the assumptions which underlie current policy. While the focus is on the English system, much of the discussion will be of interest to a wider, international readership, especially academics and graduate students.","PeriodicalId":45218,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Childrens Spirituality","volume":"26 1","pages":"251 - 253"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Childrens Spirituality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2021.2013413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

how these individual teachers are ‘in line with current trends and practices socially, but their professional context is in a different place which is at odds with, but not outside of, these influences.’ (p. 63). As Gillespie writes (p. 20), ‘it is clear that one’s past and the relationship between self and family affects the ways in which one identifies oneself and, in turn, how spirituality, or the spiritual aspect of one’s life, is understood,’ though more examination of the varying influences of community, culture and traditions would have been valuable. The focus is on teachers’ views rather than children’s. However, the emphasis on relationships, connectedness and the search for identity and belonging, with children having multiple identities and a less certain sense of belonging, fits well with recent trends in work on children’s spirituality and the importance of relational pedagogies. While a short book inevitably can cover only a limited range of issues in a very complex area, future work could usefully fill out the arguments made. For instance, while there are numerous ways in which the teachers’ spiritualities and professionalism ‘misalign’ (p. 29), specific examples and consideration of different views of professionalism would strengthen the claims being made. More discussion of the implications throughout the school curriculum and beyond – and the dilemmas that this poses – and the suggestion, which I found somewhat surprising, that these teachers associated spirituality with a call to social action, outside as well as within their classrooms, would similarly help to fill out the case presented. While Spirituality in Education is well written, thoughtful and nuanced, a brief conclusion to highlight the key points would have been helpful. It tries to link the academic discourse and how practising teachers think about spirituality and how to nurture this; and mostly does so successfully, though. Gillespie describes clearly how understandings of spirituality have changed from being almost exclusively linked with religion to a process in which everyone, whatever their age or background, is engaged and draws out the potentially radical nature of spirituality and how this challenges many of the assumptions which underlie current policy. While the focus is on the English system, much of the discussion will be of interest to a wider, international readership, especially academics and graduate students.
学习社会素养
这些教师个人如何“符合当前的社会趋势和实践,但他们的专业背景不同,这与这些影响不一致,但并不排除这些影响。”(第63页)。正如Gillespie所写(第20页),“很明显,一个人的过去以及自我和家庭之间的关系会影响一个人识别自己的方式,进而影响人们对精神或生活精神方面的理解”,尽管更多地研究社区、文化和传统的不同影响是有价值的。重点是教师的观点,而不是孩子的观点。然而,由于儿童具有多重身份和不太确定的归属感,因此强调关系、连通性以及寻找身份和归属感,这与儿童精神工作的最新趋势以及关系教育的重要性非常吻合。虽然一本简短的书不可避免地只能涵盖一个非常复杂的领域中的有限范围的问题,但未来的工作可以有效地填补所提出的论点。例如,尽管教师的精神和专业精神有很多“错位”的方式(第29页),但具体的例子和对不同专业观点的考虑会加强所提出的主张。更多地讨论学校课程内外的影响——以及由此带来的困境——以及这些教师将精神与课堂内外的社会行动呼吁联系起来的建议,我觉得有些惊讶,这同样有助于填补所提出的案例。虽然《教育中的精神》写得很好,深思熟虑,细致入微,但一个简短的结论来强调要点会很有帮助。它试图将学术话语与实践教师如何思考精神以及如何培养精神联系起来;不过,大多数情况下都是成功的。Gillespie清楚地描述了对精神的理解是如何从几乎完全与宗教联系在一起转变为每个人,无论年龄或背景如何,都参与其中的过程,并指出了精神的潜在激进性质,以及这是如何挑战当前政策的许多假设的。虽然重点是英语系统,但大部分讨论将引起更广泛的国际读者的兴趣,尤其是学者和研究生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
53.80%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信