VisRuler: Visual analytics for extracting decision rules from bagged and boosted decision trees

IF 1.8 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Angelos Chatzimparmpas, R. M. Martins, A. Kerren
{"title":"VisRuler: Visual analytics for extracting decision rules from bagged and boosted decision trees","authors":"Angelos Chatzimparmpas, R. M. Martins, A. Kerren","doi":"10.1177/14738716221142005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bagging and boosting are two popular ensemble methods in machine learning (ML) that produce many individual decision trees. Due to the inherent ensemble characteristic of these methods, they typically outperform single decision trees or other ML models in predictive performance. However, numerous decision paths are generated for each decision tree, increasing the overall complexity of the model and hindering its use in domains that require trustworthy and explainable decisions, such as finance, social care, and health care. Thus, the interpretability of bagging and boosting algorithms—such as random forest and adaptive boosting—reduces as the number of decisions rises. In this paper, we propose a visual analytics tool that aims to assist users in extracting decisions from such ML models via a thorough visual inspection workflow that includes selecting a set of robust and diverse models (originating from different ensemble learning algorithms), choosing important features according to their global contribution, and deciding which decisions are essential for global explanation (or locally, for specific cases). The outcome is a final decision based on the class agreement of several models and the explored manual decisions exported by users. We evaluated the applicability and effectiveness of VisRuler via a use case, a usage scenario, and a user study. The evaluation revealed that most users managed to successfully use our system to explore decision rules visually, performing the proposed tasks and answering the given questions in a satisfying way.","PeriodicalId":50360,"journal":{"name":"Information Visualization","volume":"22 1","pages":"115 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14738716221142005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Bagging and boosting are two popular ensemble methods in machine learning (ML) that produce many individual decision trees. Due to the inherent ensemble characteristic of these methods, they typically outperform single decision trees or other ML models in predictive performance. However, numerous decision paths are generated for each decision tree, increasing the overall complexity of the model and hindering its use in domains that require trustworthy and explainable decisions, such as finance, social care, and health care. Thus, the interpretability of bagging and boosting algorithms—such as random forest and adaptive boosting—reduces as the number of decisions rises. In this paper, we propose a visual analytics tool that aims to assist users in extracting decisions from such ML models via a thorough visual inspection workflow that includes selecting a set of robust and diverse models (originating from different ensemble learning algorithms), choosing important features according to their global contribution, and deciding which decisions are essential for global explanation (or locally, for specific cases). The outcome is a final decision based on the class agreement of several models and the explored manual decisions exported by users. We evaluated the applicability and effectiveness of VisRuler via a use case, a usage scenario, and a user study. The evaluation revealed that most users managed to successfully use our system to explore decision rules visually, performing the proposed tasks and answering the given questions in a satisfying way.
VisRuler:用于从袋装和增强决策树中提取决策规则的可视化分析
Bagging和boosting是机器学习中两种流行的集成方法,它们产生许多单独的决策树。由于这些方法固有的集成特性,它们的预测性能通常优于单决策树或其他ML模型。然而,每个决策树都会生成许多决策路径,这增加了模型的总体复杂性,并阻碍了它在需要可靠和可解释决策的领域中的使用,如金融、社会护理和医疗保健。因此,装袋和提升算法(如随机森林和自适应提升)的可解释性随着决策数量的增加而降低。在本文中,我们提出了一种视觉分析工具,旨在帮助用户通过全面的视觉检查工作流程从此类ML模型中提取决策,该工作流程包括选择一组稳健且多样化的模型(源自不同的集成学习算法),根据其全局贡献选择重要特征,以及决定哪些决定对于全局解释(或对于特定情况在本地解释)至关重要。结果是基于几个模型的类协议和用户导出的已探索的手动决策的最终决策。我们通过用例、使用场景和用户研究评估了VisRuler的适用性和有效性。评估显示,大多数用户成功地使用我们的系统直观地探索决策规则,以令人满意的方式执行所提出的任务并回答给定的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Visualization
Information Visualization COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information Visualization is essential reading for researchers and practitioners of information visualization and is of interest to computer scientists and data analysts working on related specialisms. This journal is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing articles on fundamental research and applications of information visualization. The journal acts as a dedicated forum for the theories, methodologies, techniques and evaluations of information visualization and its applications. The journal is a core vehicle for developing a generic research agenda for the field by identifying and developing the unique and significant aspects of information visualization. Emphasis is placed on interdisciplinary material and on the close connection between theory and practice. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信