Aortic-brachial stiffness mismatch as potential marker of subclinical arterial damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

E. Troitskaya, S. Velmakin, L. Goreva, Z. Kobalava
{"title":"Aortic-brachial stiffness mismatch as potential marker of subclinical arterial damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis","authors":"E. Troitskaya, S. Velmakin, L. Goreva, Z. Kobalava","doi":"10.22363/2313-0245-2023-27-2-167-181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aortic-brachial stiffness mismatch is a potential new marker of a subclinical vascular damage that has never been studied in patients with rheumatic diseases. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of arterial stiffness mismatch in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to evaluate its clinical associations. Materials and Methods. The study group included 85 patients with RA (males 22.4 %, aged 59.7 ± 14.3 years, hypertension in 65 %, mean disease activity score (DAS-28 (C-reactive protein) 3.7 ± 1.1), and the control group included 40 subjects matched by gender, age and risk factors. The study methods included measurements of clinical and ambulatory brachial and aortic blood pressure (BP) (BPLab-Vasotens), arterial stiffness parameters parameters (applanation tonometry, SphygmoCorAtCor), cardio-ankle vascular index (VaSera) and cardio-vascular risk assessments using the SCORE, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2013 pooled cohort equations and QRisk2 scoring systems. The arterial stiffness gradient was calculated as a ratio between carotid-femoral (cf) and carotid-radial (cr) pulse wave velocity, and its elevation of ≥ 1 was considered as arterial stiffness mismatch. A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. Results and Discussion. The mean stiffness gradient in RA patients without and with hypertension was 1.1 ± 0.1 and 1.4 ± 0.4, respectively (р 0.001); in controls, 0.99 ± 0.2 and 1.3 ± 0.3, respectively (р 0.001). The frequency of stiffness mismatch in the RA group was significantly higher compared to the controls in the whole study population (88.2 % vs 65 % (р = 0.002)) and in both normotensive and hypertensive subgroups (76.7 % vs 43.8 % (p = 0.03), and 94.5 % vs 79.2 % (p = 0.04), respectively). The same trend was observed in the subgroups with normal carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: arterial stiffness mismatch was present in 82.1 % of RA patients vs. 51.9 % control subjects (p = 0.004). The stiffness gradient was associated with age (r = 0.63), hypertension duration (r = 0.56), cardio-vascular risk by the ACC/AHA 2013 (r = 0.69) and Qrisk2 (r = 0.7) scoring systems, nocturnal aortic systolic BP (r = 0.53), cardio-ankle vascular index (r = 0.60) and diurnal index of brachial systolic BP (r = -0.4). Significant differences in stiffness gradient values were observed in the subgroups based on elevation of aortic systolic BP and pulse wave velocity above individual reference values, aortic pulse pressure 50 mmHg, cardio-ankle vascular index 9, presence of high cardio-vascular risk, masked and nocturnal hypertension, and non-dipping. Conclusion. Patients with RA are characterized by higher frequency of arterial stiffness mismatch compared to controls, irrespective of the history of hypertension or the values of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Arterial stiffness mismatch is associated with unfavorable 24-h BP profile, higher frequency of nocturnal hypertension and cardio-vascular risk.","PeriodicalId":21324,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0245-2023-27-2-167-181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aortic-brachial stiffness mismatch is a potential new marker of a subclinical vascular damage that has never been studied in patients with rheumatic diseases. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of arterial stiffness mismatch in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to evaluate its clinical associations. Materials and Methods. The study group included 85 patients with RA (males 22.4 %, aged 59.7 ± 14.3 years, hypertension in 65 %, mean disease activity score (DAS-28 (C-reactive protein) 3.7 ± 1.1), and the control group included 40 subjects matched by gender, age and risk factors. The study methods included measurements of clinical and ambulatory brachial and aortic blood pressure (BP) (BPLab-Vasotens), arterial stiffness parameters parameters (applanation tonometry, SphygmoCorAtCor), cardio-ankle vascular index (VaSera) and cardio-vascular risk assessments using the SCORE, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2013 pooled cohort equations and QRisk2 scoring systems. The arterial stiffness gradient was calculated as a ratio between carotid-femoral (cf) and carotid-radial (cr) pulse wave velocity, and its elevation of ≥ 1 was considered as arterial stiffness mismatch. A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. Results and Discussion. The mean stiffness gradient in RA patients without and with hypertension was 1.1 ± 0.1 and 1.4 ± 0.4, respectively (р 0.001); in controls, 0.99 ± 0.2 and 1.3 ± 0.3, respectively (р 0.001). The frequency of stiffness mismatch in the RA group was significantly higher compared to the controls in the whole study population (88.2 % vs 65 % (р = 0.002)) and in both normotensive and hypertensive subgroups (76.7 % vs 43.8 % (p = 0.03), and 94.5 % vs 79.2 % (p = 0.04), respectively). The same trend was observed in the subgroups with normal carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: arterial stiffness mismatch was present in 82.1 % of RA patients vs. 51.9 % control subjects (p = 0.004). The stiffness gradient was associated with age (r = 0.63), hypertension duration (r = 0.56), cardio-vascular risk by the ACC/AHA 2013 (r = 0.69) and Qrisk2 (r = 0.7) scoring systems, nocturnal aortic systolic BP (r = 0.53), cardio-ankle vascular index (r = 0.60) and diurnal index of brachial systolic BP (r = -0.4). Significant differences in stiffness gradient values were observed in the subgroups based on elevation of aortic systolic BP and pulse wave velocity above individual reference values, aortic pulse pressure 50 mmHg, cardio-ankle vascular index 9, presence of high cardio-vascular risk, masked and nocturnal hypertension, and non-dipping. Conclusion. Patients with RA are characterized by higher frequency of arterial stiffness mismatch compared to controls, irrespective of the history of hypertension or the values of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Arterial stiffness mismatch is associated with unfavorable 24-h BP profile, higher frequency of nocturnal hypertension and cardio-vascular risk.
类风湿关节炎患者亚临床动脉损伤的潜在标志:主动脉-肱僵硬不匹配
主动脉-肱僵硬不匹配是从未在风湿病患者中研究过的亚临床血管损伤的潜在新标志物。该研究的目的是评估类风湿关节炎(RA)中动脉僵硬度不匹配的频率,并评估其临床相关性。材料与方法。研究组纳入85例RA患者(男性22.4%,年龄59.7±14.3岁,高血压65%,平均疾病活动性评分(DAS-28 (c -反应蛋白)3.7±1.1),对照组纳入40例按性别、年龄和危险因素匹配的患者。研究方法包括测量临床和动态肱动脉和主动脉血压(BP) (BPLab-Vasotens)、动脉硬度参数参数(平压血压计、SphygmoCorAtCor)、心踝血管指数(VaSera),并使用SCORE、美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA) 2013年合并队列方程和QRisk2评分系统进行心血管风险评估。动脉刚度梯度计算为颈动脉-股动脉(cf)与颈动脉-桡动脉(cr)脉波速度之比,其升高≥1视为动脉刚度失配。p值为0.05被认为是显著的。结果和讨论。无高血压和合并高血压的RA患者的平均僵硬梯度分别为1.1±0.1和1.4±0.4 (p < 0.001);对照组分别为0.99±0.2和1.3±0.3(0.01)。RA组僵硬度不匹配的频率明显高于整个研究人群的对照组(88.2%对65%(0.002)),在正常和高血压亚组中(76.7%对43.8% (p = 0.03), 94.5%对79.2% (p = 0.04))。在颈股脉波速度正常的亚组中也观察到同样的趋势:82.1%的RA患者与51.9%的对照组存在动脉僵硬度不匹配(p = 0.004)。僵硬度梯度与年龄(r = 0.63)、高血压病程(r = 0.56)、ACC/AHA 2013评分系统心血管风险(r = 0.69)和Qrisk2评分系统心血管风险(r = 0.7)、夜间主动脉收缩压(r = 0.53)、心踝血管指数(r = 0.60)和肱动脉收缩压日指数(r = -0.4)相关。根据主动脉收缩压和脉搏波速度高于个体参考值、主动脉脉压50 mmHg、心踝血管指数9、存在心血管高危、隐蔽性和夜间高血压、无下沉等亚组观察到僵硬梯度值的显著差异。结论。与对照组相比,RA患者的特点是动脉僵硬度不匹配的频率更高,与高血压史或颈-股脉波速度值无关。动脉僵硬度不匹配与不利的24小时血压、较高的夜间高血压频率和心血管风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信