Lessons Learned from an ACT-Based Physician-Delivered Weight Loss Intervention: A Pilot RCT Demonstrates Limits to Feasibility

Mallory Frayn, K. Carrière, B. Knäuper
{"title":"Lessons Learned from an ACT-Based Physician-Delivered Weight Loss Intervention: A Pilot RCT Demonstrates Limits to Feasibility","authors":"Mallory Frayn, K. Carrière, B. Knäuper","doi":"10.1515/psych-2020-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) interventions have shown to be effective in facilitating weight loss for emotional eaters, however, the lack of accessibility of these interventions limits their impact. The present study aimed to increase the accessibility of an ACT intervention for emotional eaters through delivery by physicians. Methods: This two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial tested the effectiveness and feasibility of a brief ACT intervention for emotional eaters compared with standard care at a weight loss clinic in Toronto, Canada. Primary outcomes were changes in weight and emotional eating. Treatment satisfaction was also assessed. Results: Participants in neither condition lost weight. Both conditions displayed decreases in emotional eating, but no condition interaction was found. Both patients and physicians reported high treatment satisfaction with the ACT intervention. However, there were high attrition rates and variability in intervention completion times. Conclusion: The ACT intervention led to reductions in emotional eating and was well received by patients and physicians alike. However, the present study identified high attrition as a limitation to the feasibility of this mode of intervention delivery. Future interventions may be more effectively delivered in primary care settings by encouraging further brevity and exploring delivery by other health professionals. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03611829. Registered 26 July 2018. Retrospectively registered.","PeriodicalId":74357,"journal":{"name":"Open psychology","volume":"2 1","pages":"22 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/psych-2020-0003","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2020-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Background: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) interventions have shown to be effective in facilitating weight loss for emotional eaters, however, the lack of accessibility of these interventions limits their impact. The present study aimed to increase the accessibility of an ACT intervention for emotional eaters through delivery by physicians. Methods: This two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial tested the effectiveness and feasibility of a brief ACT intervention for emotional eaters compared with standard care at a weight loss clinic in Toronto, Canada. Primary outcomes were changes in weight and emotional eating. Treatment satisfaction was also assessed. Results: Participants in neither condition lost weight. Both conditions displayed decreases in emotional eating, but no condition interaction was found. Both patients and physicians reported high treatment satisfaction with the ACT intervention. However, there were high attrition rates and variability in intervention completion times. Conclusion: The ACT intervention led to reductions in emotional eating and was well received by patients and physicians alike. However, the present study identified high attrition as a limitation to the feasibility of this mode of intervention delivery. Future interventions may be more effectively delivered in primary care settings by encouraging further brevity and exploring delivery by other health professionals. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03611829. Registered 26 July 2018. Retrospectively registered.
基于act的医生减肥干预的经验教训:一项试点随机对照试验证明了可行性的局限性
背景:接受和承诺治疗(ACT)干预措施已被证明在促进情绪进食者减肥方面是有效的,然而,缺乏这些干预措施的可及性限制了它们的影响。本研究旨在通过医生的交付,增加对情绪化进食者的ACT干预的可及性。方法:在加拿大多伦多的一家减肥诊所进行的一项两组随机对照试验,测试了对情绪化进食者进行简短ACT干预的有效性和可行性,并与标准治疗进行了比较。主要结果是体重和情绪化饮食的变化。治疗满意度也进行了评估。结果:两种情况下的参与者体重都有所下降。两种情况下情绪性进食都有所减少,但没有发现相互作用。患者和医生对ACT干预的治疗满意度都很高。然而,在干预完成时间方面存在较高的损耗率和可变性。结论:ACT干预导致情绪性进食减少,受到患者和医生的一致好评。然而,目前的研究发现,高损耗是这种干预方式可行性的一个限制。未来的干预措施可以通过鼓励进一步简化和探索由其他卫生专业人员提供,从而在初级保健环境中更有效地提供。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03611829。2018年7月26日注册。回顾注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信