BIBLIOMETRIC REVIEW OF THE FOREST AS A TOOL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION

Q4 Environmental Science
Floresta Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.5380/rf.v53i2.86838
T. Ho, D. Biondi, Antonio Carlos Batista, A. Martini
{"title":"BIBLIOMETRIC REVIEW OF THE FOREST AS A TOOL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION","authors":"T. Ho, D. Biondi, Antonio Carlos Batista, A. Martini","doi":"10.5380/rf.v53i2.86838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contact with the forest started in childhood enables the construction of values with nature. Bibliometric studies can help in the search for works on the forest theme. Thus, the objective of this work was to analyze the general panorama of scientific research on environmental education activities related to the forest, through bibliometric characterization in WoS and Scopus databases. The works were filtered from search codes that covered the theme. All articles were checked, and those that carried out environmental education activities and used the forest as a base were considered valid. The filtering resulted in 102 articles, of these, 62 articles it was possible to carry out a methodological analysis. Articles from 37 countries were found, with a greater number for the USA and 274 different authors, but the majority (93.4%) published only one manuscript. In the methodological analysis, most include non-formal teaching in specific environmental education activities. The forest in general is used for works focused on environmental perception and awareness, and the most used environmental interpretation techniques are field practices, in guided and self-guided interpretive trails. More than 50% of the articles do not justify the applied method and several works show methodological flaws that make it difficult to replicate the practices in other studies. It is concluded in the bibliometric analysis that there are a variety of authors talking about the subject, but a reference specialist author was not identified. The methodological flaws found prove the challenges of obtaining scientific advances in environmental education from the forest.","PeriodicalId":53573,"journal":{"name":"Floresta","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Floresta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v53i2.86838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contact with the forest started in childhood enables the construction of values with nature. Bibliometric studies can help in the search for works on the forest theme. Thus, the objective of this work was to analyze the general panorama of scientific research on environmental education activities related to the forest, through bibliometric characterization in WoS and Scopus databases. The works were filtered from search codes that covered the theme. All articles were checked, and those that carried out environmental education activities and used the forest as a base were considered valid. The filtering resulted in 102 articles, of these, 62 articles it was possible to carry out a methodological analysis. Articles from 37 countries were found, with a greater number for the USA and 274 different authors, but the majority (93.4%) published only one manuscript. In the methodological analysis, most include non-formal teaching in specific environmental education activities. The forest in general is used for works focused on environmental perception and awareness, and the most used environmental interpretation techniques are field practices, in guided and self-guided interpretive trails. More than 50% of the articles do not justify the applied method and several works show methodological flaws that make it difficult to replicate the practices in other studies. It is concluded in the bibliometric analysis that there are a variety of authors talking about the subject, but a reference specialist author was not identified. The methodological flaws found prove the challenges of obtaining scientific advances in environmental education from the forest.
森林作为环境教育工具的文献计量学综述
从童年开始与森林的接触,使人们能够与自然建立价值观。文献计量学研究可以帮助寻找森林主题的作品。因此,这项工作的目的是通过WoS和Scopus数据库中的文献计量学特征,分析与森林有关的环境教育活动的科学研究的总体概况。这些作品是从涵盖主题的搜索代码中筛选出来的。所有文章都经过了检查,那些进行环境教育活动并以森林为基地的文章被认为是有效的。过滤得到102篇文章,其中62篇可以进行方法学分析。发现了来自37个国家的文章,其中美国的文章数量更多,有274位不同的作者,但大多数人(93.4%)只发表了一篇手稿。在方法论分析中,大多数将非正规教学纳入具体的环境教育活动中。森林通常用于专注于环境感知和意识的作品,最常用的环境解释技术是现场实践,在引导和自我引导的解释路径中。超过50%的文章没有证明所应用的方法是合理的,一些作品显示出方法上的缺陷,这使得很难在其他研究中复制这种做法。文献计量分析得出的结论是,有各种各样的作者在谈论这个主题,但没有确定一位参考专家作者。发现的方法论缺陷证明了从森林中获得环境教育科学进步的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Floresta
Floresta Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Revista Floresta admits articles of scientific contribution in Forest Science, in the areas of Nature Conservation, Economy and Forest Policy, Forest Management, Silviculture and Wood Technology. The main task is to promote and divulgate the development of Forest Science in Brazil and in the world. Articles published in Revista Floresta are under total responsibility of the authors, who are aware that they are original studies. It remains implicit that articles were not submitted for publication to any other divulgation media. It remains explicit the agreement of authors to norms of the journal and, along the development of their work, the observance of ethic aspects and respect of the current copyright legislation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书