Different approaches to studying inter-organisational trust relations in Polish and English literature

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
E-Mentor Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.15219/em95.1574
Rafał Staszek vel Staszewski
{"title":"Different approaches to studying inter-organisational trust relations in Polish and English literature","authors":"Rafał Staszek vel Staszewski","doi":"10.15219/em95.1574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years both in Polish and international literature, the number of studies devoted to trust in inter-organisational relations has grown at a steady pace. The authors of these studies tend to apply two methodological approaches: variance theory and process theory. The aim of this article is to compare Polish and English language academic literature with regard to the methodological approaches. The article is based on a systematic literature review of inter-organisational trust, with literature collected based on keywords and snowball methodology. The election was based on abstract analysis and the text of selected articles. The methodologies of the selected articles were presented and compared. From the initial pool of 726 positions, 32 articles in Polish and 30 in English were analysed and compared, with the data presented in a comparison table. The findings indicate a research gap in Polish-language literature in the form of an insufficient amount of research on trust at inter-organisational level using a process-based approach. Applying this approach would potentially deepen the understanding of organisations' relationships with each other, especially in the context of Poland.","PeriodicalId":42136,"journal":{"name":"E-Mentor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Mentor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15219/em95.1574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years both in Polish and international literature, the number of studies devoted to trust in inter-organisational relations has grown at a steady pace. The authors of these studies tend to apply two methodological approaches: variance theory and process theory. The aim of this article is to compare Polish and English language academic literature with regard to the methodological approaches. The article is based on a systematic literature review of inter-organisational trust, with literature collected based on keywords and snowball methodology. The election was based on abstract analysis and the text of selected articles. The methodologies of the selected articles were presented and compared. From the initial pool of 726 positions, 32 articles in Polish and 30 in English were analysed and compared, with the data presented in a comparison table. The findings indicate a research gap in Polish-language literature in the form of an insufficient amount of research on trust at inter-organisational level using a process-based approach. Applying this approach would potentially deepen the understanding of organisations' relationships with each other, especially in the context of Poland.
研究波兰和英国文献中组织间信任关系的不同方法
近年来,在波兰和国际文献中,致力于组织间关系信任的研究数量稳步增长。这些研究的作者倾向于采用两种方法论:方差理论和过程理论。本文的目的是比较波兰语和英语语言学术文献的方法论方法。本文基于对组织间信任的系统文献综述,文献收集基于关键词和滚雪球方法。选举是基于抽象分析和选定文章的文本。所选文章的方法进行了介绍和比较。从最初的726个职位中,分析和比较了32篇波兰文文章和30篇英文文章,并将数据列在比较表中。研究结果表明,波兰语文献中的研究差距,其形式是使用基于过程的方法在组织间层面上对信任的研究不足。应用这种方法可能会加深对组织之间关系的理解,特别是在波兰的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
E-Mentor
E-Mentor EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信