Effects of hand muscle function and dominance on intra-muscle synergies

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Shirin Madarshahian, Mark L. Latash
{"title":"Effects of hand muscle function and dominance on intra-muscle synergies","authors":"Shirin Madarshahian,&nbsp;Mark L. Latash","doi":"10.1016/j.humov.2022.102936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The goal of the study was to explore the effects of hand dominance and muscle function (prime mover<span> vs. supporting muscle) on recently discovered intra-muscle synergies as potential windows into their neural origin. Healthy right-handed subjects performed accurate cyclical force production tasks while pressing with the middle phalanges<span> and distal phalanges of the fingers of the dominant and non-dominant hand. </span></span></span>Surface electromyography<span> was used to identify individual motor unit<span> action potentials in two muscles, flexor digitorum<span> superficialis (FDS) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC). Stable motor unit groups (MU-modes) were defined in each muscle and in both muscles together. The composition of the MU-modes allowed linking them to the reciprocal and co-activation command. Force-stabilizing synergies were quantified in each hand and during force production at both sites using the framework of the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis. Force-stabilizing synergies were seen in the spaces of MU-modes from FDS and EDC separately, but not of MU-modes defined for both muscles together. Synergy indices were similar for both hands and both sites of force application. In contrast, force-stabilizing synergies in the space of finger forces were present in the non-dominant hand and absent in the dominant hand. The data suggest existence of distributed mechanisms of synergic control. Finger force synergies are likely to reflect functioning of subcortical loops involving the basal ganglia<span> and cerebellum, while MU-mode synergies are likely to reflect spinal circuitry. Studies of both force-based and motor-unit-based synergies may be clinically valuable for distinguishing effects of spinal and supraspinal disorders.</span></span></span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":55046,"journal":{"name":"Human Movement Science","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102936"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Movement Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167945722000161","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The goal of the study was to explore the effects of hand dominance and muscle function (prime mover vs. supporting muscle) on recently discovered intra-muscle synergies as potential windows into their neural origin. Healthy right-handed subjects performed accurate cyclical force production tasks while pressing with the middle phalanges and distal phalanges of the fingers of the dominant and non-dominant hand. Surface electromyography was used to identify individual motor unit action potentials in two muscles, flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and extensor digitorum communis (EDC). Stable motor unit groups (MU-modes) were defined in each muscle and in both muscles together. The composition of the MU-modes allowed linking them to the reciprocal and co-activation command. Force-stabilizing synergies were quantified in each hand and during force production at both sites using the framework of the uncontrolled manifold hypothesis. Force-stabilizing synergies were seen in the spaces of MU-modes from FDS and EDC separately, but not of MU-modes defined for both muscles together. Synergy indices were similar for both hands and both sites of force application. In contrast, force-stabilizing synergies in the space of finger forces were present in the non-dominant hand and absent in the dominant hand. The data suggest existence of distributed mechanisms of synergic control. Finger force synergies are likely to reflect functioning of subcortical loops involving the basal ganglia and cerebellum, while MU-mode synergies are likely to reflect spinal circuitry. Studies of both force-based and motor-unit-based synergies may be clinically valuable for distinguishing effects of spinal and supraspinal disorders.

手部肌肉功能和优势对肌肉内协同作用的影响
本研究的目的是探索手优势和肌肉功能(原动机与支持肌肉)对最近发现的肌肉内协同作用的影响,作为研究其神经起源的潜在窗口。健康的右利手受试者在使用优势手和非优势手手指的中指骨和远指骨按压时执行准确的周期性力产生任务。表面肌电图用于识别指浅屈肌(FDS)和指共伸肌(EDC)两个肌肉的单个运动单位动作电位。在每块肌肉和两块肌肉中定义稳定运动单元组(mu -模式)。mu模式的组成允许将它们连接到互激活和协同激活命令。使用不受控制流形假设的框架,在每只手和在两个地点的力生产过程中量化力稳定协同效应。在分别来自FDS和EDC的mu -模式的空间中可以看到力稳定协同作用,但在两个肌肉共同定义的mu -模式中没有。双手和施力部位的协同指标相似。相反,在非优势手中,手指空间的力稳定协同作用存在,而在优势手中则不存在。数据表明存在分布式的协同控制机制。手指力的协同作用可能反映了涉及基底节区和小脑的皮质下回路的功能,而mu模式的协同作用可能反映了脊髓回路。基于力量和基于运动单位的协同作用的研究可能对区分脊柱和脊柱上疾病的影响具有临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Movement Science
Human Movement Science 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
89
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Human Movement Science provides a medium for publishing disciplinary and multidisciplinary studies on human movement. It brings together psychological, biomechanical and neurophysiological research on the control, organization and learning of human movement, including the perceptual support of movement. The overarching goal of the journal is to publish articles that help advance theoretical understanding of the control and organization of human movement, as well as changes therein as a function of development, learning and rehabilitation. The nature of the research reported may vary from fundamental theoretical or empirical studies to more applied studies in the fields of, for example, sport, dance and rehabilitation with the proviso that all studies have a distinct theoretical bearing. Also, reviews and meta-studies advancing the understanding of human movement are welcome. These aims and scope imply that purely descriptive studies are not acceptable, while methodological articles are only acceptable if the methodology in question opens up new vistas in understanding the control and organization of human movement. The same holds for articles on exercise physiology, which in general are not supported, unless they speak to the control and organization of human movement. In general, it is required that the theoretical message of articles published in Human Movement Science is, to a certain extent, innovative and not dismissible as just "more of the same."
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信