Giacomo Aimar, Donatella Marino, Clizia Zichi, Teresa Gamba, Andrea Caglio, Francesca De Vita, Elisa Sperti, Massimo Di Maio
{"title":"Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact of systemic treatments on health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes","authors":"Giacomo Aimar, Donatella Marino, Clizia Zichi, Teresa Gamba, Andrea Caglio, Francesca De Vita, Elisa Sperti, Massimo Di Maio","doi":"10.1002/lci2.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the past years, treatment options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have thriven. Although globally recognised, the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often underused and quality of life (QoL) results are underreported in many phase III trials. We performed a systematic review to describe the prevalence of QoL inclusion and heterogeneity in QoL reporting in published phase III trials of systemic treatment in advanced HCC. Twenty-one publications were identified: 12 (57.1%) in first line setting, eight (38.1%) in second line and only one (4.7%) in second and further lines. In 14 trials (66.6%), Qol was included in the analysis as a secondary or tertiary endpoint but only in nine (47.4%) cases Qol results were published in the main paper. QoL data are lacking in a significant proportion of published phase III trials in advanced HCC. The methodology of QoL analysis is heterogeneous for type of instruments, analysis and presentation of results.</p>","PeriodicalId":93331,"journal":{"name":"Liver cancer international","volume":"3 2","pages":"90-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lci2.50","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver cancer international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lci2.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In the past years, treatment options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have thriven. Although globally recognised, the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often underused and quality of life (QoL) results are underreported in many phase III trials. We performed a systematic review to describe the prevalence of QoL inclusion and heterogeneity in QoL reporting in published phase III trials of systemic treatment in advanced HCC. Twenty-one publications were identified: 12 (57.1%) in first line setting, eight (38.1%) in second line and only one (4.7%) in second and further lines. In 14 trials (66.6%), Qol was included in the analysis as a secondary or tertiary endpoint but only in nine (47.4%) cases Qol results were published in the main paper. QoL data are lacking in a significant proportion of published phase III trials in advanced HCC. The methodology of QoL analysis is heterogeneous for type of instruments, analysis and presentation of results.