An exploration of course and cohort communication spaces in Discord, Teams, and Moodle

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
E. Heinrich, H. Thomas, E. Kahu
{"title":"An exploration of course and cohort communication spaces in Discord, Teams, and Moodle","authors":"E. Heinrich, H. Thomas, E. Kahu","doi":"10.14742/ajet.7633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examined the impact of supplementing a learning management system, Moodle, with communication tools, Discord and Teams, to support communication in blended and distance undergraduate courses in computer science, information technology, mathematics and statistics at a New Zealand university with well-established use of Moodle. Nineteen students participated in semi-structured interviews. Findings show that adding Discord or Teams increases information and knowledge exchange and helps students to connect with peers and teachers in their courses. Teams was beneficial particularly in settings with formal group work. Discord, which enables both students and staff to set up additional communication channels that are not restricted to course enrolments, was instrumental in connecting students across year levels with peers and alumni. This enabled discussions on course selection, career options and disciplinary topics beyond the course curriculum. Importantly, these beyond-course communication spaces nurtured belonging to wider discipline and study communities. The research establishes the importance of the increased levels of communication by highlighting the effects on student learning and connections to others. Looking beyond the specific tools, the level of formality and the degree of student co-ownership are identified as key factors in supporting the within- and beyond-course communication spaces.\nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nLearning management systems provide valuable course support but do not meet all learning and teaching communication needs, partly due to their formal and university-controlled nature.\nEducators and students benefit from using strong chat tools with improved information and knowledge exchange.\nBoth educators and students experience enhanced belonging when using collaboration and chat tools.\nStudents value Discord’s informality and student-led characteristics.\nEducators who use Teams to support formal group work must carefully manage integration with Moodle.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research examined the impact of supplementing a learning management system, Moodle, with communication tools, Discord and Teams, to support communication in blended and distance undergraduate courses in computer science, information technology, mathematics and statistics at a New Zealand university with well-established use of Moodle. Nineteen students participated in semi-structured interviews. Findings show that adding Discord or Teams increases information and knowledge exchange and helps students to connect with peers and teachers in their courses. Teams was beneficial particularly in settings with formal group work. Discord, which enables both students and staff to set up additional communication channels that are not restricted to course enrolments, was instrumental in connecting students across year levels with peers and alumni. This enabled discussions on course selection, career options and disciplinary topics beyond the course curriculum. Importantly, these beyond-course communication spaces nurtured belonging to wider discipline and study communities. The research establishes the importance of the increased levels of communication by highlighting the effects on student learning and connections to others. Looking beyond the specific tools, the level of formality and the degree of student co-ownership are identified as key factors in supporting the within- and beyond-course communication spaces. Implications for practice or policy: Learning management systems provide valuable course support but do not meet all learning and teaching communication needs, partly due to their formal and university-controlled nature. Educators and students benefit from using strong chat tools with improved information and knowledge exchange. Both educators and students experience enhanced belonging when using collaboration and chat tools. Students value Discord’s informality and student-led characteristics. Educators who use Teams to support formal group work must carefully manage integration with Moodle.
Discord、Teams和Moodle中课程和团队交流空间的探索
这项研究考察了用沟通工具Discord和Teams补充学习管理系统Moodle的影响,以支持新西兰一所大学计算机科学、信息技术、数学和统计学的混合和远程本科生课程中的沟通,该大学已广泛使用Moodle。19名学生参加了半结构化访谈。研究结果表明,加入Discord或Teams可以增加信息和知识交流,并帮助学生在课程中与同龄人和老师建立联系。团队是有益的,尤其是在有正式团队合作的环境中。Discord使学生和教职员工都能建立额外的沟通渠道,而这些渠道并不局限于课程注册,它有助于将不同年级的学生与同龄人和校友联系起来。这使得能够讨论课程之外的课程选择、职业选择和学科主题。重要的是,这些课程外的交流空间属于更广泛的学科和学习社区。这项研究通过强调对学生学习和与他人联系的影响,确立了提高沟通水平的重要性。除了特定的工具之外,正式程度和学生共同拥有的程度被确定为支持课程内外交流空间的关键因素。对实践或政策的影响:学习管理系统提供了宝贵的课程支持,但不能满足所有的学习和教学交流需求,部分原因是其正式和大学控制的性质。教育工作者和学生受益于使用强大的聊天工具,改善信息和知识交流。在使用协作和聊天工具时,教育工作者和学生都会体验到更强的归属感。学生们重视Discord的非正式性和学生主导的特点。使用团队来支持正式团队工作的教育工作者必须小心管理与Moodle的集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信