A multidimensional scalogram analysis of UK acid attacks: exploring the differences and similarities in offending characteristics

IF 0.6 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
C. Mann, D. Mojtahedi, Chelsea Leadley
{"title":"A multidimensional scalogram analysis of UK acid attacks: exploring the differences and similarities in offending characteristics","authors":"C. Mann, D. Mojtahedi, Chelsea Leadley","doi":"10.1108/SC-09-2019-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine whether cases of acid attacks within the UK could be differentiated based on the offence characteristics and motivations.,The study used a multi-dimensional scalogram analysis (MSA) to examine the similarities and differences between the behaviours that were acted out during the 30 cases.,Results found a clear division amongst acid attack offenders through multiple variables, mainly pertaining to whether the attack was predicated and the motivation. This was found to be comparable with instrumental and expressive actions.,The findings have potential to contribute to psychological theory to categorise and define acid attack offences. This would also greatly assist in suspect prioritisation and other aspects of police investigations.,Reports of acid attacks within the UK are rising. The motivations behind these offences are predominantly related to gang violence and acts of revenge. However, the current literature around acid attacks has largely focussed on the victim perspective, with little research around offenders and their actions.","PeriodicalId":43879,"journal":{"name":"Safer Communities","volume":"19 1","pages":"73-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/SC-09-2019-0028","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safer Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/SC-09-2019-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether cases of acid attacks within the UK could be differentiated based on the offence characteristics and motivations.,The study used a multi-dimensional scalogram analysis (MSA) to examine the similarities and differences between the behaviours that were acted out during the 30 cases.,Results found a clear division amongst acid attack offenders through multiple variables, mainly pertaining to whether the attack was predicated and the motivation. This was found to be comparable with instrumental and expressive actions.,The findings have potential to contribute to psychological theory to categorise and define acid attack offences. This would also greatly assist in suspect prioritisation and other aspects of police investigations.,Reports of acid attacks within the UK are rising. The motivations behind these offences are predominantly related to gang violence and acts of revenge. However, the current literature around acid attacks has largely focussed on the victim perspective, with little research around offenders and their actions.
英国酸液攻击的多维标度图分析:探究攻击特征的异同
本研究旨在确定英国境内的酸液袭击案件是否可以根据犯罪特征和动机进行区分。,该研究使用多维尺度图分析(MSA)来检查30例患者行为之间的相似性和差异性。,结果发现,通过多个变量,酸液袭击罪犯之间存在明显的差异,主要与袭击是否是预测的和动机有关。这被发现与工具性和表达性动作相当。,这些发现有可能为分类和定义酸液攻击罪的心理学理论做出贡献。这也将大大有助于嫌疑人的优先顺序和警方调查的其他方面。,关于英国境内酸液袭击事件的报道越来越多。这些犯罪背后的动机主要与帮派暴力和报复行为有关。然而,目前关于酸液袭击的文献主要集中在受害者的角度,对罪犯及其行为的研究很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safer Communities
Safer Communities CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信