CAUTI-bundle application in patients' care among nurses in a Nigerian tertiary health facility

IF 0.4 Q4 NURSING
Ezike Okwudili Calistus MSc, Linda C. Odikpo PhD,  Onyia Evert MSc, Amadi Osinachi Chidinma BSc, Egbuniwe Michel Chiedu MSc, Ada C. Nwaneri PhD, Ngozi E. Makata PhD, Ihudiebube-Splendor Chikaodilli PhD
{"title":"CAUTI-bundle application in patients' care among nurses in a Nigerian tertiary health facility","authors":"Ezike Okwudili Calistus MSc,&nbsp;Linda C. Odikpo PhD,&nbsp; Onyia Evert MSc,&nbsp;Amadi Osinachi Chidinma BSc,&nbsp;Egbuniwe Michel Chiedu MSc,&nbsp;Ada C. Nwaneri PhD,&nbsp;Ngozi E. Makata PhD,&nbsp;Ihudiebube-Splendor Chikaodilli PhD","doi":"10.1111/ijun.12360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is the most prevalent healthcare-associated infection worldwide, and the use of care bundles such as CAUTI bundles has been identified as the most effective ways of preventing it. This cross sectional descriptive study thus, evaluated the application and barriers to application of CAUTI bundles in patients' care among nurses in a tertiary government hospitals. Census method was used to recruit into the study all 446 registered nurses and midwives who met the inclusion criteria in the institution; thus, no sampling was done to select the participants from the study area. Data were collected by means of researchers' developed and validated semi-structured self-administered questionnaire delivered through Google drive. Univariate and bivariate data analyses were conducted with the aid of SPSS version 24. Results of the study revealed that only 7 (1.9%) of the nurses claimed they always use written guidelines during catheter insertion, whilst majority 57.4% do not follow any written protocol or guidelines when inserting catheter. The use of aseptic non-touch technique was always done by 80% of the respondents. In general, score on compliance with the bundles was poor, as only 46.4% of the respondents correctly apply the bundles to patients' care. Barriers to application of the bundles as revealed by the results include; lack of written policy/guideline documents on CAUTI bundles in the facility (100%), lack of existing monitoring and feedback tools (98.9%), Supervisors/staff do not feel empowered to challenge suboptimal practices in a safe way (52.4%), lack of team meeting/ward round routinely addressing patients with indwelling urinary catheter (78.6%). It is thus, imperative to conclude that although the nurses in this study have some knowledge about the catheter associated urinary tract infections' bundles, their application of the bundles to patients' care is very poor, and was found to be due to some modifiable barriers. These barriers are some of the areas nurse educators and hospital policy-makers should focus in their bid to curbing healthcare acquired infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"17 3","pages":"165-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is the most prevalent healthcare-associated infection worldwide, and the use of care bundles such as CAUTI bundles has been identified as the most effective ways of preventing it. This cross sectional descriptive study thus, evaluated the application and barriers to application of CAUTI bundles in patients' care among nurses in a tertiary government hospitals. Census method was used to recruit into the study all 446 registered nurses and midwives who met the inclusion criteria in the institution; thus, no sampling was done to select the participants from the study area. Data were collected by means of researchers' developed and validated semi-structured self-administered questionnaire delivered through Google drive. Univariate and bivariate data analyses were conducted with the aid of SPSS version 24. Results of the study revealed that only 7 (1.9%) of the nurses claimed they always use written guidelines during catheter insertion, whilst majority 57.4% do not follow any written protocol or guidelines when inserting catheter. The use of aseptic non-touch technique was always done by 80% of the respondents. In general, score on compliance with the bundles was poor, as only 46.4% of the respondents correctly apply the bundles to patients' care. Barriers to application of the bundles as revealed by the results include; lack of written policy/guideline documents on CAUTI bundles in the facility (100%), lack of existing monitoring and feedback tools (98.9%), Supervisors/staff do not feel empowered to challenge suboptimal practices in a safe way (52.4%), lack of team meeting/ward round routinely addressing patients with indwelling urinary catheter (78.6%). It is thus, imperative to conclude that although the nurses in this study have some knowledge about the catheter associated urinary tract infections' bundles, their application of the bundles to patients' care is very poor, and was found to be due to some modifiable barriers. These barriers are some of the areas nurse educators and hospital policy-makers should focus in their bid to curbing healthcare acquired infections.

尼日利亚三级卫生机构护士在患者护理中的CAUTI捆绑应用
导尿管相关性尿路感染(CAUTI)是世界范围内最普遍的卫生保健相关感染,使用护理包(如CAUTI包)已被确定为预防其最有效的方法。因此,本横断面描述性研究评估了三级政府医院护士在患者护理中应用CAUTI束的情况和障碍。采用人口普查方法招募符合纳入标准的446名注册护士和助产士进入研究;因此,没有进行抽样以从研究区域中选择参与者。数据通过研究人员开发和验证的半结构化自我管理问卷收集,通过谷歌驱动发送。单变量和双变量数据分析使用SPSS version 24进行。研究结果显示,只有7名护士(1.9%)表示他们在置管过程中始终遵循书面指南,而大多数57.4%的护士在置管过程中没有遵循任何书面协议或指南。80%的受访者使用无菌非接触技术。一般来说,对束的依从性得分很差,因为只有46.4%的受访者正确地将束应用于患者护理。研究结果表明,该束应用的障碍包括:医院缺乏关于CAUTI束的书面政策/指南文件(100%),缺乏现有的监测和反馈工具(98.9%),主管/工作人员没有权力以安全的方式挑战次优做法(52.4%),缺乏团队会议/病房查房常规处理留置导尿患者(78.6%)。因此,我们必须得出这样的结论:尽管本研究中的护士对导管相关尿路感染束有一定的了解,但他们在患者护理中对束的应用非常差,并且被发现是由于一些可修改的障碍。这些障碍是护士教育者和医院决策者在努力遏制医疗获得性感染时应该关注的一些领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信