The effect of prehospital notification by emergency medical service on outcomes in patients receiving recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA).

IF 0.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shahram Rafie, Narges Mofrad-Booshehri, Davood Shalil-Ahmadi, Elham Maraghi
{"title":"The effect of prehospital notification by emergency medical service on outcomes in patients receiving recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA).","authors":"Shahram Rafie, Narges Mofrad-Booshehri, Davood Shalil-Ahmadi, Elham Maraghi","doi":"10.18502/cjn.v21i2.10497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> According to the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) guidelines, in acute stroke, the door-to-computed tomography (CT) scan (DTC) time should be less than 25 minutes, and time to injection of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) [door-to-needle (DTN) time] should be less than 60 minutes. <b>Methods:</b> We had a tendency to prospectively collect the clinical and time information of patients who received r-tPA during one year after the initiation of prehospital notification (PN). Patients were divided into three groups, covering patients transferred by Emergency Medical Service (EMS) with and without PN, and non-EMS. We then contrasted the impact of EMS with PN and EMS use on onset-to-needle time (ONT), and the neurological outcome. Good outcome was determined as Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) ≤ 2 at 3-month follow-up. <b>Results:</b> Among 102 studied patients, 64% were transferred by EMS, of whom 53.9% entered PN. Compared with non-PN groups, EMS with PN group showed significantly shorter DTN and DTC time, as well as ONT. <b>Conclusion:</b> Our study showed that EMS with PN, rather than EMS, significantly improved stroke outcome by shortening of ONT.</p>","PeriodicalId":40077,"journal":{"name":"Current Journal of Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9860204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/cjn.v21i2.10497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: According to the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) guidelines, in acute stroke, the door-to-computed tomography (CT) scan (DTC) time should be less than 25 minutes, and time to injection of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) [door-to-needle (DTN) time] should be less than 60 minutes. Methods: We had a tendency to prospectively collect the clinical and time information of patients who received r-tPA during one year after the initiation of prehospital notification (PN). Patients were divided into three groups, covering patients transferred by Emergency Medical Service (EMS) with and without PN, and non-EMS. We then contrasted the impact of EMS with PN and EMS use on onset-to-needle time (ONT), and the neurological outcome. Good outcome was determined as Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) ≤ 2 at 3-month follow-up. Results: Among 102 studied patients, 64% were transferred by EMS, of whom 53.9% entered PN. Compared with non-PN groups, EMS with PN group showed significantly shorter DTN and DTC time, as well as ONT. Conclusion: Our study showed that EMS with PN, rather than EMS, significantly improved stroke outcome by shortening of ONT.

急诊医疗服务院前通知对接受重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(r-tPA)治疗患者预后的影响
背景:根据美国心脏协会和美国卒中协会(AHA/ASA)指南,在急性卒中中,门到计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描(DTC)时间应少于25分钟,重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(r-tPA)注射时间[门到针(DTN)时间]应少于60分钟。方法:我们倾向于前瞻性地收集院前通知(PN)开始后一年内接受r-tPA治疗的患者的临床和时间信息。患者分为三组,包括由紧急医疗服务(EMS)转移的患者,有和没有PN,以及非EMS。然后,我们对比了EMS与PN和EMS使用对起病到针时间(ONT)和神经学预后的影响。3个月随访时,改良兰金量表(MRS)≤2为预后良好。结果:102例患者中有64%通过EMS转院,其中53.9%进入PN转院。与非PN组相比,EMS加PN组DTN、DTC时间及ONT均显著缩短。结论:我们的研究表明,EMS联合PN,而不是EMS,通过缩短ONT显著改善卒中预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Journal of Neurology
Current Journal of Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信