Factors affecting cervical cancer screening service uptake among clients visiting the ART clinic at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Hawassa, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.
{"title":"Factors affecting cervical cancer screening service uptake among clients visiting the ART clinic at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Hawassa, Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Birhanu Lulu, Eskindir Loha, asnakech agegnehu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4206831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nAnnually, around half a million new cases of cervical cancer and 250,000 deaths occur worldwide. It is the second-leading cancerous cause of death after breast cancer among women. Repeated infection and prolonged persistence with human papilloma virus is common among HIV-positive women due to their immune status. A one-visit screen and treat strategy for cervical cancer prevention was instituted in 2010 nationwide in 14 selected hospitals. So, assessing service uptake and associated factors among ART clients is mandatory.\n\n\nMETHOD\nFrom December 2015 to March 2016 G.C., a cross-sectional study was conducted. An interviewer-administered, semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data. The data were entered, cleaned, and analyzed using IBM SPSS version 20 software. A statistically significant association of variables was determined based on an adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval and a p value of 0.05.\n\n\nRESULT\nCervical cancer screening service uptake among the 647 interviewed participants was 59%. Study participants accounting for 19% (N = 123) were 18-29 age group, 56.6% (N = 366) were 30-39, and 24.4% (N = 158) were in 40-64 age group. Of 647 participants, 43.7% (N = 283) were illiterate and educated less than secondary level of education, 36.0% (N = 233) had a secondary level of education, and 20.2% (N = 131) had an education above secondary. Being encouraged by others to get screened for cervical cancer (AOR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.25, 2.82), knowing another woman who got screened, and getting information from the media (AOR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.60) were associated with the uptake of cervical cancer screening.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe uptake of cervical cancer screening among ART clients attending the clinic was not satisfactory. Encouragement to get screened, knowing other screened women, and getting information from the media were important predictors of CCS service uptake. Exploring more information on the attitudes of clients to improve service uptake is mandatory.\n\n\nAVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL\nRaw data supporting this study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon request.","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4206831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Annually, around half a million new cases of cervical cancer and 250,000 deaths occur worldwide. It is the second-leading cancerous cause of death after breast cancer among women. Repeated infection and prolonged persistence with human papilloma virus is common among HIV-positive women due to their immune status. A one-visit screen and treat strategy for cervical cancer prevention was instituted in 2010 nationwide in 14 selected hospitals. So, assessing service uptake and associated factors among ART clients is mandatory.
METHOD
From December 2015 to March 2016 G.C., a cross-sectional study was conducted. An interviewer-administered, semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data. The data were entered, cleaned, and analyzed using IBM SPSS version 20 software. A statistically significant association of variables was determined based on an adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval and a p value of 0.05.
RESULT
Cervical cancer screening service uptake among the 647 interviewed participants was 59%. Study participants accounting for 19% (N = 123) were 18-29 age group, 56.6% (N = 366) were 30-39, and 24.4% (N = 158) were in 40-64 age group. Of 647 participants, 43.7% (N = 283) were illiterate and educated less than secondary level of education, 36.0% (N = 233) had a secondary level of education, and 20.2% (N = 131) had an education above secondary. Being encouraged by others to get screened for cervical cancer (AOR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.25, 2.82), knowing another woman who got screened, and getting information from the media (AOR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.60) were associated with the uptake of cervical cancer screening.
CONCLUSION
The uptake of cervical cancer screening among ART clients attending the clinic was not satisfactory. Encouragement to get screened, knowing other screened women, and getting information from the media were important predictors of CCS service uptake. Exploring more information on the attitudes of clients to improve service uptake is mandatory.
AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL
Raw data supporting this study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon request.