Latent class analysis of patients' background factors affecting the risk of specific adverse drug reactions to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Daigo Kaseda, M. Hashiguchi, Hayato Kizaki, Satoko Hori
{"title":"Latent class analysis of patients' background factors affecting the risk of specific adverse drug reactions to dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors.","authors":"Daigo Kaseda, M. Hashiguchi, Hayato Kizaki, Satoko Hori","doi":"10.5414/CP204192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE\nSpontaneous reporting is widely used to identify adverse drug reactions (ADRs), but relatively little is known about the relationships between specific ADRs and background factors of affected patients. Here, we applied latent class analysis (LCA) to identify background factors associated with different ADRs in type 2 diabetes patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nPatients using only a DPP-4 inhibitor who encountered ADRs were selected from the JADER database up to April 2019 (N = 3,577). LCA was employed to classify these cases based on underlying diseases and lifestyle factors (alcohol, tobacco, diet, and exercise) and to identify characteristic ADRs in each class. The optimum number of classes was determined by selecting the model with the lowest value of the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).\n\n\nRESULTS\nA six-class model had the lowest BIC, and these classes were characterized by specific background factors and ADRs. For example, one class included diabetes complications, while another class included exercise and diet as background factors. Increased risk of a specific ADR(s), such as pancreatitis or pemphigoid, was found in each class. The nine DPP-4 inhibitors were not uniformly distributed among the classes, though individual classes included patients receiving different inhibitors.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nOur findings indicate that characteristic background factors of patients experiencing specific DPP-4 inhibitor-induced ADRs reported in the JADER database are different and can be classified by LCA. This methodology may be useful for predicting ADRs not detected during drug development.","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Spontaneous reporting is widely used to identify adverse drug reactions (ADRs), but relatively little is known about the relationships between specific ADRs and background factors of affected patients. Here, we applied latent class analysis (LCA) to identify background factors associated with different ADRs in type 2 diabetes patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients using only a DPP-4 inhibitor who encountered ADRs were selected from the JADER database up to April 2019 (N = 3,577). LCA was employed to classify these cases based on underlying diseases and lifestyle factors (alcohol, tobacco, diet, and exercise) and to identify characteristic ADRs in each class. The optimum number of classes was determined by selecting the model with the lowest value of the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). RESULTS A six-class model had the lowest BIC, and these classes were characterized by specific background factors and ADRs. For example, one class included diabetes complications, while another class included exercise and diet as background factors. Increased risk of a specific ADR(s), such as pancreatitis or pemphigoid, was found in each class. The nine DPP-4 inhibitors were not uniformly distributed among the classes, though individual classes included patients receiving different inhibitors. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that characteristic background factors of patients experiencing specific DPP-4 inhibitor-induced ADRs reported in the JADER database are different and can be classified by LCA. This methodology may be useful for predicting ADRs not detected during drug development.
潜在类别分析影响二肽基肽酶4抑制剂特异性不良反应风险的患者背景因素。
背景与目的经皮报告被广泛用于识别药物不良反应,但对特定药物不良反应与受影响患者背景因素之间的关系知之甚少。在这里,我们使用日本药物不良事件报告(JADER)数据库,应用潜在类别分析(LCA)来确定使用二肽基肽酶4(DPP-4)抑制剂治疗的2型糖尿病患者中与不同ADR相关的背景因素。材料和方法从截至2019年4月的JADER数据库中选择仅使用DPP-4抑制剂并出现不良反应的患者(N=3577)。LCA用于根据潜在疾病和生活方式因素(酒精、烟草、饮食和运动)对这些病例进行分类,并确定每一类的特征性ADR。通过选择贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)值最低的模型来确定最佳类别数量。RESULTSA六类模型具有最低的BIC,并且这些类别由特定的背景因素和ADR表征。例如,一个类别包括糖尿病并发症,而另一个类别则将运动和饮食作为背景因素。每一类中都发现特定ADR(如胰腺炎或类天疱疮)的风险增加。九种DPP-4抑制剂在不同类别中的分布并不均匀,尽管个别类别包括接受不同抑制剂的患者。结论我们的研究结果表明,在JADER数据库中报告的经历特定DPP-4抑制剂诱导的ADR的患者的特征背景因素是不同的,可以通过LCA进行分类。该方法可用于预测药物开发过程中未检测到的不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信