Comfort Evaluation of Cyclists Jerseys Using Wear Trial Test

IF 0.7 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES
Yetanawork Teyeme, B. Malengier, T. Tesfaye, S. Vasile, L. Langenhove, Fashion, Buchtenstraat Ghent Belgium Arts
{"title":"Comfort Evaluation of Cyclists Jerseys Using Wear Trial Test","authors":"Yetanawork Teyeme, B. Malengier, T. Tesfaye, S. Vasile, L. Langenhove, Fashion, Buchtenstraat Ghent Belgium Arts","doi":"10.14502/tekstilec2020.64.263-275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate the wear comfort of four commercially available cycling outfits and under¬stand various subjective parameters of garments through consumer perception, which will enable the design and development of an optimized outfit. A questionnaire was developed specifically to address various key aspects such as tactile sensation, garment fit with reference to size, garment assembly, garment aesthetics (style and shape), comfort (before, during and after wearing) and overall satisfaction (relating to design of the garment and style). Three outfits were fabricated from polyester fabric and one from polyamide/elastane (80%/20%) fabric. They were assessed by four male professional cyclists (age 22−25) at various stages of a test protocol of 45 minutes total duration, of which 20 minutes was flat cycling. The four tested garments showed greater dif¬ferences between the sensorial comfort perceptions than thermophysiological comfort. The sensorial comfort sensation was found to be mainly correlated with fabric properties, fit, construction techniques and moisture sensation, whereas the thermophysiological comfort was found to be affected by the fabric characteristics, the test environment conditions and level of activity. Additionally, manual measurements showed great brand-based differences between garments of the same specified size M (medium). Overall, the polyamide/elastane jersey was perceived as a better cycling outfit than the polyester outfit. The results of this study provide guidance for the optimal design and development of professional cyclist outfits.","PeriodicalId":22555,"journal":{"name":"TEKSTILEC","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEKSTILEC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14502/tekstilec2020.64.263-275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the wear comfort of four commercially available cycling outfits and under¬stand various subjective parameters of garments through consumer perception, which will enable the design and development of an optimized outfit. A questionnaire was developed specifically to address various key aspects such as tactile sensation, garment fit with reference to size, garment assembly, garment aesthetics (style and shape), comfort (before, during and after wearing) and overall satisfaction (relating to design of the garment and style). Three outfits were fabricated from polyester fabric and one from polyamide/elastane (80%/20%) fabric. They were assessed by four male professional cyclists (age 22−25) at various stages of a test protocol of 45 minutes total duration, of which 20 minutes was flat cycling. The four tested garments showed greater dif¬ferences between the sensorial comfort perceptions than thermophysiological comfort. The sensorial comfort sensation was found to be mainly correlated with fabric properties, fit, construction techniques and moisture sensation, whereas the thermophysiological comfort was found to be affected by the fabric characteristics, the test environment conditions and level of activity. Additionally, manual measurements showed great brand-based differences between garments of the same specified size M (medium). Overall, the polyamide/elastane jersey was perceived as a better cycling outfit than the polyester outfit. The results of this study provide guidance for the optimal design and development of professional cyclist outfits.
运用穿着试验评价自行车运动员运动衫的舒适性
这项研究的目的是评估四种商用骑行服的穿着舒适性,并通过消费者的感知来了解服装的各种主观参数,这将有助于优化服装的设计和开发。专门制定了一份调查问卷,以解决各种关键方面的问题,如触觉、与尺码相关的服装合身度、服装组合、服装美学(风格和形状)、舒适度(穿着前、穿着中和穿着后)和整体满意度(与服装设计和风格有关)。三套服装由聚酯织物制成,一套由聚酰胺/弹性纤维(80%/20%)织物制成。他们由四名男性职业自行车手(年龄22-25岁)在总持续时间为45分钟的测试方案的不同阶段进行评估,其中20分钟为平地自行车。四件测试服装显示,感官舒适感与热生理舒适感之间的差异更大。感官舒适感主要与织物性能、贴合度、施工工艺和水分感有关,而热生理舒适感受织物特性、测试环境条件和活动水平的影响。此外,手工测量显示,相同指定尺寸M(中等)的服装之间存在巨大的品牌差异。总的来说,聚酰胺/弹性纤维球衣被认为是比聚酯服装更好的骑行装备。本研究的结果为职业自行车运动员服装的优化设计和开发提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
TEKSTILEC
TEKSTILEC MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信