Knowledge sharing in a virtual world

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Claire Laybats, Luke Tredinnick
{"title":"Knowledge sharing in a virtual world","authors":"Claire Laybats, Luke Tredinnick","doi":"10.1177/0266382120979936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have a number of papers related to knowledge sharing and flow in this issue and I wanted to reflect on what that means in the current working climate. At the time of writing England has just entered into its second full lockdown as the Coronavirus shows no signs of abating. Office workers who were starting to return to the office in some cases are now back to working from home full time. It is therefore more and more important to facilitate effectively the sharing of knowledge as the face to face disconnect continues. An article in McKinsey Insights, Reimagining the postpandemic organization reflects on how the pandemic has changed previously bureaucratic organisations to be more adaptive and innovative, making quicker decisions. Access to senior executives and quicker decisions with a recognition that inertia is a more risky strategy than a willingness to ‘make decisions and go’ had enabled organisations to be more flexible and able to survive. This reflects what I have heard from conversations I have been involved in recently – the change in operations has seen a number of organisations flatten out and open up. Perhaps counterintuitively then it seems that the inability to be in the same location as other employees has been a facilitator to connect directly with key stakeholders and decision makers who have the ability to make things happen. This change in accessibility of senior stakeholders could be down to the initial slowing down everyone experienced as the first lockdown took hold, giving these people more time to take a moment to think how to survive and move forward under these conditions. How this will continue to develop and change is anyone’s guess but what is clear is a recognition and willingness to adapt to the changing environment is a key survival instinct. McKinsey’s article goes on to delve further into this scenario to speculate how things could be in the near future. Good communication channels are the key to making the right connections to share knowledge and create an innovative space to find solutions to today’s challenges. Part of this is to ensure trust, trust in the system, operations and people. The ability to connect and share information, knowledge and expertise in the right context will enable us to get at to what is needed and help navigate the sea of misinformation and fake news. How do you develop trust in an online remote working world? Trust is about believing in the system, that the technology works as it should, that it does what it says it will do, that people do what they say they will do, that what is expected happens and if it doesn’t we can find out why. The main challenge is facilitating engagement and connecting people. Technology is helping us utilise knowledge and data internally, so is there a way to effectively combine the technologies available to us with the more people to people aspects of knowledge management? A white paper from KM World entitled Knowledge Aware: the future of knowledge management takes a look at changes needed in knowledge management practice as we work in an ever more digitised environment and remote working situation. Written before the pandemic they reflect on the increasing trend for remote and asynchronous working, take a critical look at the current traditional models for knowledge management and conclude that in order for knowledge management to be successful users of knowledge need access to knowledge that is:","PeriodicalId":39735,"journal":{"name":"Business Information Review","volume":"37 1","pages":"140 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0266382120979936","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Information Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382120979936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We have a number of papers related to knowledge sharing and flow in this issue and I wanted to reflect on what that means in the current working climate. At the time of writing England has just entered into its second full lockdown as the Coronavirus shows no signs of abating. Office workers who were starting to return to the office in some cases are now back to working from home full time. It is therefore more and more important to facilitate effectively the sharing of knowledge as the face to face disconnect continues. An article in McKinsey Insights, Reimagining the postpandemic organization reflects on how the pandemic has changed previously bureaucratic organisations to be more adaptive and innovative, making quicker decisions. Access to senior executives and quicker decisions with a recognition that inertia is a more risky strategy than a willingness to ‘make decisions and go’ had enabled organisations to be more flexible and able to survive. This reflects what I have heard from conversations I have been involved in recently – the change in operations has seen a number of organisations flatten out and open up. Perhaps counterintuitively then it seems that the inability to be in the same location as other employees has been a facilitator to connect directly with key stakeholders and decision makers who have the ability to make things happen. This change in accessibility of senior stakeholders could be down to the initial slowing down everyone experienced as the first lockdown took hold, giving these people more time to take a moment to think how to survive and move forward under these conditions. How this will continue to develop and change is anyone’s guess but what is clear is a recognition and willingness to adapt to the changing environment is a key survival instinct. McKinsey’s article goes on to delve further into this scenario to speculate how things could be in the near future. Good communication channels are the key to making the right connections to share knowledge and create an innovative space to find solutions to today’s challenges. Part of this is to ensure trust, trust in the system, operations and people. The ability to connect and share information, knowledge and expertise in the right context will enable us to get at to what is needed and help navigate the sea of misinformation and fake news. How do you develop trust in an online remote working world? Trust is about believing in the system, that the technology works as it should, that it does what it says it will do, that people do what they say they will do, that what is expected happens and if it doesn’t we can find out why. The main challenge is facilitating engagement and connecting people. Technology is helping us utilise knowledge and data internally, so is there a way to effectively combine the technologies available to us with the more people to people aspects of knowledge management? A white paper from KM World entitled Knowledge Aware: the future of knowledge management takes a look at changes needed in knowledge management practice as we work in an ever more digitised environment and remote working situation. Written before the pandemic they reflect on the increasing trend for remote and asynchronous working, take a critical look at the current traditional models for knowledge management and conclude that in order for knowledge management to be successful users of knowledge need access to knowledge that is:
虚拟世界中的知识共享
我们在这个问题上有很多关于知识共享和流动的论文,我想反思一下在当前的工作环境下这意味着什么。在撰写本文时,由于冠状病毒没有减弱的迹象,英格兰刚刚进入第二次全面封锁。在某些情况下,开始回到办公室的上班族现在又回到了全职在家工作。因此,随着面对面脱节的持续,有效促进知识共享变得越来越重要。《麦肯锡洞察》上的一篇文章《重塑疫情后的组织》反映了疫情如何改变了以前的官僚组织,使其更具适应性和创新性,更快地做出决策。接触高级管理人员和更快地做出决策,认识到惰性是一种比“做决定就走”更危险的策略,这使组织更加灵活,能够生存。这反映了我从最近参与的对话中听到的情况——随着运营的变化,许多组织变得扁平化和开放。也许与直觉相反的是,无法与其他员工在同一地点,这似乎成为了与关键利益相关者和有能力实现目标的决策者直接联系的促进者。高级利益相关者可及性的这种变化可能是由于第一次封锁开始时,每个人都经历了最初的放缓,这让这些人有更多的时间思考如何在这种情况下生存和前进。这将如何继续发展和改变是任何人的猜测,但显而易见的是,认识到并愿意适应不断变化的环境是一种关键的生存本能。麦肯锡的文章进一步探讨了这种情况,以推测在不久的将来情况会如何。良好的沟通渠道是建立正确联系以分享知识和创造创新空间以找到应对当今挑战的解决方案的关键。其中一部分是为了确保信任,对系统、运营和人员的信任。在正确的背景下连接和共享信息、知识和专业知识的能力将使我们能够获得所需信息,并帮助我们在虚假信息和假新闻的海洋中航行。在一个在线远程工作的世界里,你是如何建立信任的?信任就是相信这个系统,相信技术能正常工作,相信它会做它说要做的事,相信人们会做他们说要做什么,相信预期会发生什么,如果没有,我们就能找出原因。主要挑战是促进人们的参与和联系。技术正在帮助我们在内部利用知识和数据,那么有没有一种方法可以有效地将我们可用的技术与知识管理的更多人对人方面结合起来?知识管理世界的一份题为《知识意识:知识管理的未来》的白皮书着眼于当我们在日益数字化的环境和远程工作环境中工作时,知识管理实践所需的变革。他们写在疫情之前,反思了远程和异步工作的增长趋势,批判性地审视了当前传统的知识管理模式,并得出结论,为了让知识管理成为知识的成功用户,需要获得以下知识:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Business Information Review
Business Information Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Business Information Review (BIR) is concerned with information and knowledge management within organisations. To be successful organisations need to gain maximum value from exploiting relevant information and knowledge. BIR deals with information strategies and operational good practice across the range of activities required to deliver this information dividend. The journal aims to highlight developments in the economic, social and technological landscapes that will impact the way organisations operate. BIR also provides insights into the factors that contribute to individual professional success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信