M. Boumans
{"title":"Shaping the Phenomena","authors":"M. Boumans","doi":"10.3917/rpec.221.0085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current expression of “flatten the curve” has similarities with mid-twentieth century macro-economic policy that can aptly be characterized as “shaping macro phenomena.” To the extent these similarities hold, the historical-epistemological analysis of this kind of macro-economic policy can provides us with a better understanding of the preconditions for the effectiveness of the current COVID-19 flatten-the-curve policy. Policy in terms of shaping a phenomenon presumes that the phenomenon in question exists and has a certain shape that can be moulded. This moulding, however, is not assumed to be performed directly on the shape itself, but by operating the mechanism that generates this shape, and which is also believed to exist. Therefore the precondition for this kind of policy is knowing the mechanism at work. The knowledge of this kind of intervention needed to change the shape in a desired direction, this knowledge about the mechanism, is assumed to be captured by a mathematical model on which several policies can be tried out to see which one leads to the desired shape. Mid-twentieth century macro-economic policy aimed at shaping the business cycle, and hence was based on the belief in the existence of a business cycle mechanism. With the loss of the belief in the existence of such a mechanism, the policy of shaping the business cycle disappeared with that too. This paper unpacks this history and shows how this policy based on mechanical reasoning, which originated in natural science, was gradually replaced by an approach that takes into account non-natural aspects of human behaviour. © 2022 by the authors.","PeriodicalId":36051,"journal":{"name":"Revue de Philosophie Economique","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue de Philosophie Economique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rpec.221.0085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
塑造现象
当前对“平坦曲线”的表述与20世纪中期的宏观经济政策有相似之处,可以恰当地描述为“塑造宏观现象”。在这种相似性的基础上,对这种宏观经济政策进行历史认识论分析,可以让我们更好地理解当前疫情扁平化政策有效性的前提条件。就塑造现象而言,政策假定所讨论的现象存在,并且具有可以塑造的某种形状。然而,这种成型并不是直接在形状本身上进行的,而是通过操作产生这种形状的机制来完成的,而且这种机制也被认为是存在的。因此,这种政策的前提是了解其作用机制。这种干预所需的知识,这种关于机制的知识,可以通过一个数学模型来获取,在这个模型上,可以尝试几种策略,看看哪一种会导致理想的形状。20世纪中期的宏观经济政策旨在塑造商业周期,因此是基于对存在商业周期机制的信念。随着人们不再相信存在这样一种机制,塑造商业周期的政策也随之消失。本文揭示了这段历史,并展示了这种基于机械推理的政策,它起源于自然科学,是如何逐渐被一种考虑人类行为非自然方面的方法所取代的。©2022作者所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。