Misconduct in Clinical Research in India: Perception of Clinical Research Professional in India

M. Patel
{"title":"Misconduct in Clinical Research in India: Perception of Clinical Research Professional in India","authors":"M. Patel","doi":"10.4172/2155-9627.1000303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Misconduct in clinical research is an unfortunate reality and widespread. Researchers are expected to conduct research and report results honestly. However, that is not how clinical trials always get done. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guideline is adopted internationally as a standard operating process for purpose of conducting, recording or reporting clinical trials. However, unavailability of international harmonized framework for misconduct management makes clinical research industry vulnerable to commit misconduct. Most of the cases of misconduct are probably not published. They are not recognized or covered up altogether. Misconduct and fraud can be due to any reasons and of various types. In all circumstances, any misconduct should be handled strictly and related regulations should be at place to prevent occurrences. Very few cases of scientific misconducts have been identified or reported in India. However, there is no evidence that all clinical trials conducted in India meet ethical standards and misconduct does not exist. Rather it is more likely that the scientific misconduct amongst researcher have not been systematically investigated. This article discusses the possible reasons for the occurrence of scientific misconduct and explores options, which can possibly help prevent such instances.","PeriodicalId":89408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical research & bioethics","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-9627.1000303","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical research & bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9627.1000303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Misconduct in clinical research is an unfortunate reality and widespread. Researchers are expected to conduct research and report results honestly. However, that is not how clinical trials always get done. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guideline is adopted internationally as a standard operating process for purpose of conducting, recording or reporting clinical trials. However, unavailability of international harmonized framework for misconduct management makes clinical research industry vulnerable to commit misconduct. Most of the cases of misconduct are probably not published. They are not recognized or covered up altogether. Misconduct and fraud can be due to any reasons and of various types. In all circumstances, any misconduct should be handled strictly and related regulations should be at place to prevent occurrences. Very few cases of scientific misconducts have been identified or reported in India. However, there is no evidence that all clinical trials conducted in India meet ethical standards and misconduct does not exist. Rather it is more likely that the scientific misconduct amongst researcher have not been systematically investigated. This article discusses the possible reasons for the occurrence of scientific misconduct and explores options, which can possibly help prevent such instances.
印度临床研究中的不当行为:印度临床研究专业人员的认知
临床研究中的不端行为是一个不幸的现实,而且普遍存在。研究人员应该诚实地进行研究并报告结果。然而,临床试验并不总是这样进行的。良好临床操作规范(GCP)指南是国际上采用的进行、记录或报告临床试验的标准操作程序。然而,由于缺乏国际统一的不当行为管理框架,临床研究行业容易发生不当行为。大多数不当行为的案例可能不会被公布。它们不会被完全识别或掩盖。不当行为和欺诈可以由于任何原因和各种类型。在任何情况下,任何不当行为都应严格处理,并应制定相关规定以防止发生。在印度,发现或报告的科学不端行为案例很少。然而,没有证据表明在印度进行的所有临床试验都符合道德标准,也不存在不当行为。更有可能的是,研究人员的科学不端行为没有得到系统的调查。本文讨论了科学不端行为发生的可能原因,并探讨了可能有助于防止此类事件发生的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信