Exploring the viability of ChatGPT as an alternative to traditional chatbot systems in library and information centers

Q2 Social Sciences
Subhajit Panda, Navkirandeep Kaur
{"title":"Exploring the viability of ChatGPT as an alternative to traditional chatbot systems in library and information centers","authors":"Subhajit Panda, Navkirandeep Kaur","doi":"10.1108/lhtn-02-2023-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of using ChatGPT-based chatbot systems as an alternative to traditional knowledge base-based chatbot systems in library and information centers (LICs).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study used a qualitative research approach to examine the viability of ChatGPT-based chatbot systems in LICs. The researchers conducted an extensive literature review and analyzed data collected from interviews with experts in the field of library and information science.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings of the study reveal that ChatGPT-based chatbot systems are a viable alternative to traditional knowledge base-based chatbot systems in LICs. ChatGPT has the potential to provide more accurate and personalized responses to user queries, improve the user experience and reduce the workload of library staff. However, there are some limitations to the use of ChatGPT in LICs, such as the need for substantial training data and the risk of perpetuating biases.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to explore the potential of ChatGPT-based chatbot systems in the context of LICs. The research provides insights into the advantages and limitations of ChatGPT-based chatbots and highlights the possibilities for future use of this technology in the information service industry.\n","PeriodicalId":39748,"journal":{"name":"Library Hi Tech News","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Hi Tech News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-02-2023-0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of using ChatGPT-based chatbot systems as an alternative to traditional knowledge base-based chatbot systems in library and information centers (LICs). Design/methodology/approach The study used a qualitative research approach to examine the viability of ChatGPT-based chatbot systems in LICs. The researchers conducted an extensive literature review and analyzed data collected from interviews with experts in the field of library and information science. Findings The findings of the study reveal that ChatGPT-based chatbot systems are a viable alternative to traditional knowledge base-based chatbot systems in LICs. ChatGPT has the potential to provide more accurate and personalized responses to user queries, improve the user experience and reduce the workload of library staff. However, there are some limitations to the use of ChatGPT in LICs, such as the need for substantial training data and the risk of perpetuating biases. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to explore the potential of ChatGPT-based chatbot systems in the context of LICs. The research provides insights into the advantages and limitations of ChatGPT-based chatbots and highlights the possibilities for future use of this technology in the information service industry.
探索ChatGPT作为图书馆和信息中心传统聊天机器人系统的替代方案的可行性
目的本研究的目的是探索在图书馆和信息中心(LICs)使用基于ChatGPT的聊天机器人系统作为传统的基于知识库的聊天机器人的替代方案的可行性。研究人员进行了广泛的文献综述,并分析了从图书馆和信息科学领域的专家访谈中收集的数据。研究结果表明,在LIC中,基于ChatGPT的聊天机器人系统是传统的基于知识库的聊天机器人的可行替代方案。ChatGPT有潜力为用户查询提供更准确和个性化的响应,改善用户体验,减少图书馆工作人员的工作量。然而,在LIC中使用ChatGPT有一些局限性,例如需要大量的训练数据和偏见长期存在的风险。原创性/价值据作者所知,这项研究是首次探索基于ChatGPT的聊天机器人系统在LIC背景下的潜力的研究之一。这项研究深入了解了基于ChatGPT的聊天机器人的优势和局限性,并强调了这项技术未来在信息服务行业使用的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Library Hi Tech News
Library Hi Tech News Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Library Hi Tech News (LHTN) helps busy professionals stay abreast of current events and developments in the library and information industry. LHTN publishes articles of varying lengths, reports from relevant conferences, and case studies of how technology is used in the library. The Editors work closely with authors who are new to publishing, and those who are seeking outlets for reporting on practical uses of IT in libraries. Publishing your article in LHTN can be "a place to start," analogous to a "poster session in print", and does not preclude publishing a more fulsome piece in a peer-reviewed journal at a later date. Readers consider LHTN as the source from which to hear what’s coming next in terms of technology development for academic and public libraries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信