The role of frequency of use in lexical change

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Diachronica Pub Date : 2019-12-18 DOI:10.1075/dia.00017.wil
Fiona M. Wilson, Panayiotis A. Pappas, A. Mooers
{"title":"The role of frequency of use in lexical change","authors":"Fiona M. Wilson, Panayiotis A. Pappas, A. Mooers","doi":"10.1075/dia.00017.wil","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Based on the number of words per meaning across the Indo-European Swadesh list, Pagel et al. (2007) suggest that frequency of use is a general mechanism of linguistic evolution. We test this claim using within-language change. From the IDS (Key & Comrie 2015) we compiled a comparative word list of 1,147 cognate pairs for Classical Latin and Modern Spanish, and 1,231 cognate pairs for Classical and Modern Greek. We scored the amount of change for each cognate pair in the two language histories according to a novel 6-point scale reflecting increasing levels of change from regular sound change to external borrowing. We find a weak negative correlation between frequency of use and lexical change for both the Latin-Spanish and Classical-Modern Greek language developments, but post hoc tests reveal that low frequency of use of borrowed words drive these patterns, casting some doubt on frequency of use as a general mechanism of language change.","PeriodicalId":44637,"journal":{"name":"Diachronica","volume":"36 1","pages":"584-612"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diachronica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.00017.wil","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Based on the number of words per meaning across the Indo-European Swadesh list, Pagel et al. (2007) suggest that frequency of use is a general mechanism of linguistic evolution. We test this claim using within-language change. From the IDS (Key & Comrie 2015) we compiled a comparative word list of 1,147 cognate pairs for Classical Latin and Modern Spanish, and 1,231 cognate pairs for Classical and Modern Greek. We scored the amount of change for each cognate pair in the two language histories according to a novel 6-point scale reflecting increasing levels of change from regular sound change to external borrowing. We find a weak negative correlation between frequency of use and lexical change for both the Latin-Spanish and Classical-Modern Greek language developments, but post hoc tests reveal that low frequency of use of borrowed words drive these patterns, casting some doubt on frequency of use as a general mechanism of language change.
使用频率在词汇变化中的作用
摘要Pagel等人(2007)根据印欧Swadesh列表中每个意思的单词数量提出,使用频率是语言进化的一种普遍机制。我们使用内部语言更改来测试这一说法。根据IDS(Key&Comrie 2015),我们编制了一份对比单词表,其中包括1147对古典拉丁语和现代西班牙语同源词,1231对古典希腊语和现代希腊语同源词。我们根据一个新颖的6分量表对两种语言历史中每对同源词的变化量进行了评分,该量表反映了从规则发音变化到外部借用的变化水平不断增加。我们发现,拉丁西班牙语和古典现代希腊语的使用频率与词汇变化之间存在微弱的负相关,但事后测试表明,借用词的低使用频率驱动了这些模式,这让人们对使用频率作为语言变化的一般机制产生了一些怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diachronica
Diachronica Multiple-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Diachronica provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of information concerning all aspects of language change in any and all languages of the globe. Contributions which combine theoretical interest and philological acumen are especially welcome. Diachronica appears three times per year, publishing articles, review articles, book reviews, and a miscellanea section including notes, reports and discussions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信