Revisiting the structure of (±)-[Co(en)3]I3·H2O – X-ray crystallographic and second-Harmonic results

IF 0.9 4区 材料科学 Q3 CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
Khurshid Sohail, R. Lalancette, I. Bernal, Xiao-Ling Guo, Liuyan Zhao
{"title":"Revisiting the structure of (±)-[Co(en)3]I3·H2O – X-ray crystallographic and second-Harmonic results","authors":"Khurshid Sohail, R. Lalancette, I. Bernal, Xiao-Ling Guo, Liuyan Zhao","doi":"10.1515/zkri-2022-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As described in the Introduction, we became interested in the existing literature for the crystallization behavior of (±)-[Co(en)3]I3·H2O and the absolute configuration of its enantiomers because of our project on the historical sequence of chemical studies leading Werner to formulate his Theory of Coordination Chemistry. In so doing, we discovered a number of interesting facts, including the possibility that the published “Pbca” structure of the (±)-[Co(en)3]I3·H2O was incorrect, and that it really crystallizes as a kryptoracemate in space group P212121. Other equally interesting facts concerning the crystallization behavior of [Co(en)3]I3·H2O are detailed below, together with an explanation why Platon incorrectly selects, in this case, the space group Pbca instead of the correct choice, P212121. As for the Flack parameter, (±)-[Co(en)3]I3·H2O provides an example long sought by Flack himself – a challenging case, differing from the norm. For that purpose, data sets (for the pure enantiomer and for the racemate) were collected at 100 K with R-factors of 4.24 and 2.82%, respectively, which are ideal for such a test. The fact that Pbca is unacceptable in this case is documented by the results of Second-Harmonic Generation experiments. CCDC nos: 1562401 for compound (I) and 1562403 for compound (II).","PeriodicalId":48676,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials","volume":"237 1","pages":"393 - 402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Kristallographie-Crystalline Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zkri-2022-0044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRYSTALLOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract As described in the Introduction, we became interested in the existing literature for the crystallization behavior of (±)-[Co(en)3]I3·H2O and the absolute configuration of its enantiomers because of our project on the historical sequence of chemical studies leading Werner to formulate his Theory of Coordination Chemistry. In so doing, we discovered a number of interesting facts, including the possibility that the published “Pbca” structure of the (±)-[Co(en)3]I3·H2O was incorrect, and that it really crystallizes as a kryptoracemate in space group P212121. Other equally interesting facts concerning the crystallization behavior of [Co(en)3]I3·H2O are detailed below, together with an explanation why Platon incorrectly selects, in this case, the space group Pbca instead of the correct choice, P212121. As for the Flack parameter, (±)-[Co(en)3]I3·H2O provides an example long sought by Flack himself – a challenging case, differing from the norm. For that purpose, data sets (for the pure enantiomer and for the racemate) were collected at 100 K with R-factors of 4.24 and 2.82%, respectively, which are ideal for such a test. The fact that Pbca is unacceptable in this case is documented by the results of Second-Harmonic Generation experiments. CCDC nos: 1562401 for compound (I) and 1562403 for compound (II).
对(±)-[Co(en)3]I3·H2O结构的修正——X射线晶体学和二次谐波结果
摘要如引言所述,由于我们对化学研究的历史序列进行了研究,导致Werner制定了他的配位化学理论,我们对现有文献中关于(±)-[Co(en)3]I3·H2O的结晶行为及其对映体的绝对构型产生了兴趣。在这样做的过程中,我们发现了许多有趣的事实,包括已发表的(±)-[Co(en)3]I3·H2O的“Pbca”结构可能是不正确的,并且它确实在P212121空间群中结晶为氪受体。关于[Co(en)3]I3·H2O结晶行为的其他同样有趣的事实在下面详细介绍,并解释为什么Platon在这种情况下错误地选择了空间群Pbca而不是正确的选择P212121。关于Flack参数,(±)-[Co(en)3]I3·H2O提供了Flack本人长期寻求的一个例子——一个具有挑战性的案例,与规范不同。为此,在100K下收集数据集(纯对映体和外消旋体的数据集),R因子分别为4.24%和2.82%,这对于这种测试来说是理想的。二次谐波产生实验的结果证明了在这种情况下Pbca是不可接受的。CCDC编号:化合物(I)1562401,化合物(II)1562403。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Zeitschrift für Kristallographie – Crystalline Materials was founded in 1877 by Paul von Groth and is today one of the world’s oldest scientific journals. It offers a place for researchers to present results of their theoretical experimental crystallographic studies. The journal presents significant results on structures and on properties of organic/inorganic substances with crystalline character, periodically ordered, modulated or quasicrystalline on static and dynamic phenomena applying the various methods of diffraction, spectroscopy and microscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信