“I GO DOWNSTREAM, AND YOU GO TOWARD THE SNOWSTORM”: EXPRESSIONS OF CARDINAL DIRECTIONS IN NGANASAN AND DOLGAN

IF 0.2 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY
Беата Вагнер-Надь
{"title":"“I GO DOWNSTREAM, AND YOU GO TOWARD THE SNOWSTORM”: EXPRESSIONS OF CARDINAL DIRECTIONS IN NGANASAN AND DOLGAN","authors":"Беата Вагнер-Надь","doi":"10.23951/2307-6119-2022-4-73-83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This corpus-based study is dedicated to the topic of spatial orientation in two genetically unrelated but geographically neighboring languages, Ngnasan and Dolgan. Nganasan belongs to the Northern-Samoyedic branch of the Uralic language family, while Dolgan is a Turkic language. The Dolgans reached the peninsula later than the Nganasan and inhabited rather the eastern part. The goal is to typologically examine the linguistic realization of the directions of the so-called compass orientation. This is a very well-known fact that many indigenous languages, including many languages spoken in Siberia, do not know compass orientation. According to Brown (1983), speakers of many indigenous languages use three or only two cardinal points, however, in many languages, the speakers do not necessarily use the names of the compass direction but apply other concepts for expressing spatial directions. Brown (1983) identifies several sources of lexemes expressing the cardinal points, such as celestial bodies, which is the most often used source. It also occurs in the Samoyedic languages, e.g. in Selkup, but as we will see, not in the closely related Nganasan. Atmospheric features such as wind, seasons, blizzards, or environment- specific features such as a mountain, forest, or tundra can be metaphorically extended, thereby acting as the conceptual source of cardinal directions. The study follows Brown's typologization and tries to classify the results into their typological categories. We will find similarities and differences between the two languages regarding the conceptual sources. Both languages rely on the so-called landmarks for orientation in the surrounding areas, such as tundra, forest, river, or mountain, but beyond that, Nganasan uses other, non-common categories as well. These reflect a connection to their way of life; thus, it can be interpreted as a culture-specific source, which in turn has its origin in the environment. In contrast, the Nganasans do not use rivers as orientation points at all, although they live partly on the same rivers. Also typical only for the Nganasan is the use of atmospheric features a conceptual source. It does not play a role in any way in the Dolgan.","PeriodicalId":52022,"journal":{"name":"Tomskii Zhurnal Lingvisticheskikh i Antropologicheskikh Issledovanii-Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tomskii Zhurnal Lingvisticheskikh i Antropologicheskikh Issledovanii-Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23951/2307-6119-2022-4-73-83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This corpus-based study is dedicated to the topic of spatial orientation in two genetically unrelated but geographically neighboring languages, Ngnasan and Dolgan. Nganasan belongs to the Northern-Samoyedic branch of the Uralic language family, while Dolgan is a Turkic language. The Dolgans reached the peninsula later than the Nganasan and inhabited rather the eastern part. The goal is to typologically examine the linguistic realization of the directions of the so-called compass orientation. This is a very well-known fact that many indigenous languages, including many languages spoken in Siberia, do not know compass orientation. According to Brown (1983), speakers of many indigenous languages use three or only two cardinal points, however, in many languages, the speakers do not necessarily use the names of the compass direction but apply other concepts for expressing spatial directions. Brown (1983) identifies several sources of lexemes expressing the cardinal points, such as celestial bodies, which is the most often used source. It also occurs in the Samoyedic languages, e.g. in Selkup, but as we will see, not in the closely related Nganasan. Atmospheric features such as wind, seasons, blizzards, or environment- specific features such as a mountain, forest, or tundra can be metaphorically extended, thereby acting as the conceptual source of cardinal directions. The study follows Brown's typologization and tries to classify the results into their typological categories. We will find similarities and differences between the two languages regarding the conceptual sources. Both languages rely on the so-called landmarks for orientation in the surrounding areas, such as tundra, forest, river, or mountain, but beyond that, Nganasan uses other, non-common categories as well. These reflect a connection to their way of life; thus, it can be interpreted as a culture-specific source, which in turn has its origin in the environment. In contrast, the Nganasans do not use rivers as orientation points at all, although they live partly on the same rivers. Also typical only for the Nganasan is the use of atmospheric features a conceptual source. It does not play a role in any way in the Dolgan.
“我往下游走,你往暴风雪方向走”:甘那山和多尔干的基本方向表达
这项基于语料库的研究致力于研究两种遗传上无关但地理上相邻的语言——恩格纳桑语和多尔干语的空间定位。恩加纳桑语属于乌拉尔语族的北萨莫耶迪语分支,而多尔干语是突厥语。多尔干人到达半岛的时间比恩加纳桑人晚,居住在东部。目的是类型学地考察所谓罗盘取向的方向的语言实现。这是一个众所周知的事实,许多土著语言,包括西伯利亚的许多语言,不知道指南针的方向。根据Brown(1983),许多土著语言的使用者使用三个或只有两个基点,然而,在许多语言中,使用者不一定使用罗盘方向的名称,而是使用其他概念来表达空间方向。Brown(1983)确定了几种表示基点的词素来源,如天体,这是最常用的来源。它也出现在萨莫耶迪语中,例如在Selkup,但正如我们将看到的,在密切相关的Nganasan中没有。大气特征,如风、季节、暴风雪,或特定于环境的特征,如山、森林或苔原,可以隐喻地延伸,从而作为基本方向的概念来源。该研究遵循布朗的类型学,并试图将结果分类到它们的类型学类别中。我们将发现两种语言在概念来源方面的异同。两种语言都依靠所谓的地标来定位周围地区,如苔原、森林、河流或山脉,但除此之外,Nganasan也使用其他不常见的类别。这些反映了与他们的生活方式的联系;因此,它可以被解释为一种文化特定的来源,而这种来源又源于环境。相比之下,恩加纳桑人根本不使用河流作为定位点,尽管他们部分生活在同一条河流上。另外一个典型的例子是利用大气特征作为概念源。它在Dolgan中没有任何作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信