Sources of transitivity – CORRIGENDUM

IF 1.2 2区哲学 Q3 ECONOMICS

Economics and Philosophy Pub Date : 2023-02-16 DOI:10.1017/s026626712300007x

Daniel Muñoz

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author would like to correct some text in the article above: Page 10, line 2:‘Die X will probably beat Die Y if X’s highest four numbers are greater than the highest four numbers of Y. With this rule, the ‘will probably beat’ relation is cyclic: A > B > C > A.’ Should read:‘A die (a1, : : : , a6) has better odds against a die (b1, : : : , b6) if and only if there are more pairs (i, j) such that ai > bj than there are pairs (i, j) such that ai < bj. (See Polymath 2022).’

查看原文本刊更多论文

传递性的来源——CORRIGENDUM

作者想更正上面文章中的一些文字：第10页第2行：“如果X的最高四个数字大于Y的最高四个子数字，那么Die X可能会击败Die Y。根据这条规则，“可能击败”关系是循环的：A>B>C>A。“应该读为：‘一个骰子（a1，：：，a6）对一个骰子的胜算（b1，：：：，b6）更好，当且仅当有更多的对（i，j）使得ai＞bj，而不是有对（i、j）使得ai＜bj。（见Polymath 2022）。”

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Economics and Philosophy Multiple-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The disciplines of economics and philosophy each possess their own special analytical methods, whose combination is powerful and fruitful. Each discipline can be enriched by the other. Economics and Philosophy aims to promote their mutual enrichment by publishing articles and book reviews in all areas linking these subjects. Topics include the methodology and epistemology of economics, the foundations of decision theory and game theory, the nature of rational choice in general, historical work on economics with a philosophical purpose, ethical issues in economics, the use of economic techniques in ethical theory, and many other subjects.