Assessment of spike-AMP and qPCR-AMP in soil microbiota quantitative research

IF 10.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Meiling Zhang , Liyu Zhang , Shuyu Huang , Wentao Li , Wei Zhou , Laurent Philippot , Chao Ai
{"title":"Assessment of spike-AMP and qPCR-AMP in soil microbiota quantitative research","authors":"Meiling Zhang ,&nbsp;Liyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Shuyu Huang ,&nbsp;Wentao Li ,&nbsp;Wei Zhou ,&nbsp;Laurent Philippot ,&nbsp;Chao Ai","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Relative microbiome profiling (RMP) using new sequencing approaches has limited capacity to detect shifts in microbial abundances. The growing need for absolute abundances has led to advances in absolute microbiome profiling (AMP). However, the performance and universal applicability of these various AMP methods remain unclear. Here, the two most popular AMP methods, spike-in method (spike-AMP) and </span>quantitative PCR combined with high-throughput sequencing (qPCR-AMP), were evaluated in </span>soil microbiota<span> research. Our results showed that the quantitative results based on spike-AMP were inconsistent with expected trends. The spike-derived absolute abundance was indeterminate and highly dependent on the amount of spike added. Furthermore, no good correlation was found between the addition of spike copies and output of spike reads, especially at low spike levels, contradicting the theoretical assumption of the spike-in method. Spike addition consumed substantial sequencing resources, and more importantly, it altered the original microbial community structure, explaining 16.1%–36.2% of structural variation. In contrast, the more common qPCR-AMP method provided valuable insights into the understanding of soil microbial dynamics in response to straw addition. Our results showed that the straw-induced variations in some dominant phyla such as </span></span><em>Proteobacteria</em>, <em>Actinobacteriota</em> and <span><em>Ascomycota</em></span><span> could only be detected by absolute rather than relative microbial profiling. We inferred microbial networks based on absolute and relative data matrices, respectively, and observed that the choice of data type essentially impacted the patterns of co-occurrence networks and the recognition of module hubs. The keystones and enriched phyla only detected by absolute microbial profiling were confirmed to be involved in straw decomposition by a stable isotope probing experiment. Overall, AMP can provide valuable insights into the understanding of soil microbial dynamics in response to environmental fluctuations. Given its stability and technical feasibility, qPCR-AMP may be broadly applicable to soil microbiota quantitative research.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 108570"},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003807172200027X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Relative microbiome profiling (RMP) using new sequencing approaches has limited capacity to detect shifts in microbial abundances. The growing need for absolute abundances has led to advances in absolute microbiome profiling (AMP). However, the performance and universal applicability of these various AMP methods remain unclear. Here, the two most popular AMP methods, spike-in method (spike-AMP) and quantitative PCR combined with high-throughput sequencing (qPCR-AMP), were evaluated in soil microbiota research. Our results showed that the quantitative results based on spike-AMP were inconsistent with expected trends. The spike-derived absolute abundance was indeterminate and highly dependent on the amount of spike added. Furthermore, no good correlation was found between the addition of spike copies and output of spike reads, especially at low spike levels, contradicting the theoretical assumption of the spike-in method. Spike addition consumed substantial sequencing resources, and more importantly, it altered the original microbial community structure, explaining 16.1%–36.2% of structural variation. In contrast, the more common qPCR-AMP method provided valuable insights into the understanding of soil microbial dynamics in response to straw addition. Our results showed that the straw-induced variations in some dominant phyla such as Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota and Ascomycota could only be detected by absolute rather than relative microbial profiling. We inferred microbial networks based on absolute and relative data matrices, respectively, and observed that the choice of data type essentially impacted the patterns of co-occurrence networks and the recognition of module hubs. The keystones and enriched phyla only detected by absolute microbial profiling were confirmed to be involved in straw decomposition by a stable isotope probing experiment. Overall, AMP can provide valuable insights into the understanding of soil microbial dynamics in response to environmental fluctuations. Given its stability and technical feasibility, qPCR-AMP may be broadly applicable to soil microbiota quantitative research.

spike-AMP和qPCR-AMP在土壤微生物群定量研究中的评价
使用新的测序方法的相对微生物组分析(RMP)检测微生物丰度变化的能力有限。对绝对丰度的日益增长的需求导致了绝对微生物组分析(AMP)的进步。然而,这些不同的AMP方法的性能和普遍适用性仍然不清楚。本文对两种最流行的AMP方法——尖刺法(spike-AMP)和定量PCR结合高通量测序(qPCR-AMP)在土壤微生物群研究中的应用进行了评价。结果表明,基于峰值amp的定量结果与预期趋势不一致。穗衍生的绝对丰度是不确定的,高度依赖于穗添加量。此外,在刺突拷贝的增加和刺突读取的输出之间没有发现很好的相关性,特别是在低刺突水平时,这与刺突插入方法的理论假设相矛盾。加穗消耗了大量的测序资源,更重要的是,它改变了原有的微生物群落结构,解释了16.1%-36.2%的结构变异。相比之下,更常见的qPCR-AMP方法为理解秸秆添加对土壤微生物动力学的响应提供了有价值的见解。结果表明,秸秆诱导的一些优势菌门(如变形菌门、放线菌门和子囊菌门)的变化只能通过绝对微生物谱而不能通过相对微生物谱来检测。我们分别基于绝对和相对数据矩阵推断微生物网络,并观察到数据类型的选择本质上影响共现网络的模式和模块中心的识别。稳定同位素探测实验证实,仅通过绝对微生物谱检测到的关键岩和富集门参与了秸秆分解。总的来说,AMP可以为理解土壤微生物动态对环境波动的响应提供有价值的见解。由于其稳定性和技术可行性,qPCR-AMP可以广泛应用于土壤微生物群的定量研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信