The mutagenicity of organic extracts in source water and peripheral water with different disinfection ways

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Y. Zhong, Xiaotong Li, Qiying Huang, Rende Huang, Zi-Yan Zhou, Hua Bi, P. Feng, Dedong Wang
{"title":"The mutagenicity of organic extracts in source water and peripheral water with different disinfection ways","authors":"Y. Zhong, Xiaotong Li, Qiying Huang, Rende Huang, Zi-Yan Zhou, Hua Bi, P. Feng, Dedong Wang","doi":"10.26789/AEB.2019.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine mutagen contamination, to compare the differences between inlet and outlet distribution, and the possible impacts on public health. Water samples were collected from four different waterworks in Guangzhou, China. The Ames test was conducted to investigate the potential mutagenicity caused by organic extracts from drinking water sources and peripheral water. Organic content was extracted with XAD-2 resin column and organic solvents, and toxicity was tested in three doses of extract equivalent, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 L source water. The results of the Ames test showed that all the organic extracts from water samples could induce different levels of mutagenic potentials in the absence of S9 mix, which indicated mutagenicity and strain. Comparing with TA98, TA100 was more sensitive in genotoxicity. Mutagenic enhancement factors were found in both drinking water sources and peripheral water. Water treatment technologies with different disinfection ways could increase the mutagenicity of water, but the biological significance of mutagenicity of the organic extracts remained to be further confirmed. The results suggested that it was necessary to concern the relationship between source water, water treatment unit and the mutagenicity factors of water.","PeriodicalId":36987,"journal":{"name":"Applied Environmental Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Environmental Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26789/AEB.2019.01.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine mutagen contamination, to compare the differences between inlet and outlet distribution, and the possible impacts on public health. Water samples were collected from four different waterworks in Guangzhou, China. The Ames test was conducted to investigate the potential mutagenicity caused by organic extracts from drinking water sources and peripheral water. Organic content was extracted with XAD-2 resin column and organic solvents, and toxicity was tested in three doses of extract equivalent, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 L source water. The results of the Ames test showed that all the organic extracts from water samples could induce different levels of mutagenic potentials in the absence of S9 mix, which indicated mutagenicity and strain. Comparing with TA98, TA100 was more sensitive in genotoxicity. Mutagenic enhancement factors were found in both drinking water sources and peripheral water. Water treatment technologies with different disinfection ways could increase the mutagenicity of water, but the biological significance of mutagenicity of the organic extracts remained to be further confirmed. The results suggested that it was necessary to concern the relationship between source water, water treatment unit and the mutagenicity factors of water.
不同消毒方式的水源水和周边水中有机提取物的诱变性
本研究旨在确定诱变剂污染,比较入口和出口分布之间的差异,以及对公众健康的可能影响。从中国广州的四个不同的自来水厂采集了水样。Ames试验是为了研究饮用水源和周边水的有机提取物引起的潜在致突变性。用XAD-2树脂柱和有机溶剂提取有机物含量,并在0.2、0.4和0.8L三种剂量的提取物当量的源水中测试毒性。Ames试验结果表明,在没有S9混合物的情况下,所有水样的有机提取物都能诱导不同水平的诱变潜力,这表明了其诱变性和菌株。与TA98相比,TA100对基因毒性更敏感。在饮用水源和周边水源中都发现了致突变增强因子。不同消毒方式的水处理技术会增加水的致突变性,但有机提取物致突变性的生物学意义还有待进一步证实。结果表明,有必要关注水源水、水处理装置与水致突变性因素之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Environmental Biotechnology
Applied Environmental Biotechnology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信