Direct Pharmacist Prescribing of Emergency Contraception: Findings of an Academic Detailing Intervention Pilot Study

M. Nguyen, Niamh O'Grady, S. Rafie, S. Mody, Marisa Hildebrand
{"title":"Direct Pharmacist Prescribing of Emergency Contraception: Findings of an Academic Detailing Intervention Pilot Study","authors":"M. Nguyen, Niamh O'Grady, S. Rafie, S. Mody, Marisa Hildebrand","doi":"10.37901/jcphp20-00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This exploratory study tested the effectiveness of an academic detailing (AD) intervention for improving pharmacist emergency contraception (EC) practices compared to a handout intervention in a state where pharmacists can prescribe EC using a statewide protocol. AD is a peer educational outreach designed to encourage evidence-based practices that improve patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Methods In this pilot randomized controlled trial, four community pharmacies in San Diego County, California, received an AD intervention or a control handout intervention regarding pharmacist prescribing of EC. The AD intervention group received a one-hour training from an expert pharmacist regarding EC prescribing and an informational EC handout, while the handout intervention group received only the handout. Participants completed a survey assessing EC practices, knowledge, and attitudes before and after the interventions. Phone interviews were performed one month following the interventions. Participants in the AD intervention group demonstrated greater knowledge of clinical considerations for prescribing ulipristal acetate (UPA) EC and California statewide protocols for pharmacist prescribing of EC compared to the handout intervention. Participants in the AD intervention were also more likely to have begun prescribing EC following the intervention compared to those in the handout intervention, which was observed in both quantitative and qualitative results. Increased prescribing rates in the AD intervention group highlight the utility of AD for implementation of pharmacist services. Training that focuses on the clinical considerations for the EC products and statewide protocol for pharmacists’ prescribing of EC could lead to increased community access to EC in pharmacies and more accurate counseling by pharmacists.","PeriodicalId":15502,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37901/jcphp20-00019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This exploratory study tested the effectiveness of an academic detailing (AD) intervention for improving pharmacist emergency contraception (EC) practices compared to a handout intervention in a state where pharmacists can prescribe EC using a statewide protocol. AD is a peer educational outreach designed to encourage evidence-based practices that improve patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Methods In this pilot randomized controlled trial, four community pharmacies in San Diego County, California, received an AD intervention or a control handout intervention regarding pharmacist prescribing of EC. The AD intervention group received a one-hour training from an expert pharmacist regarding EC prescribing and an informational EC handout, while the handout intervention group received only the handout. Participants completed a survey assessing EC practices, knowledge, and attitudes before and after the interventions. Phone interviews were performed one month following the interventions. Participants in the AD intervention group demonstrated greater knowledge of clinical considerations for prescribing ulipristal acetate (UPA) EC and California statewide protocols for pharmacist prescribing of EC compared to the handout intervention. Participants in the AD intervention were also more likely to have begun prescribing EC following the intervention compared to those in the handout intervention, which was observed in both quantitative and qualitative results. Increased prescribing rates in the AD intervention group highlight the utility of AD for implementation of pharmacist services. Training that focuses on the clinical considerations for the EC products and statewide protocol for pharmacists’ prescribing of EC could lead to increased community access to EC in pharmacies and more accurate counseling by pharmacists.
直接药剂师处方紧急避孕药:一项学术详细干预试点研究的结果
目的本探索性研究测试了在药剂师可以使用全州方案开具紧急避孕处方的州,与分发干预相比,学术详细(AD)干预对改善药剂师紧急避孕(EC)实践的有效性。AD是一种同伴教育外展活动,旨在鼓励循证实践,以改善患者结果和医疗成本。方法在这项试点随机对照试验中,加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥县的四家社区药房接受了关于EC药剂师处方的AD干预或对照讲义干预。AD干预组接受了专家药剂师关于EC处方的一小时培训和EC信息讲义,而讲义干预组只接受讲义。参与者完成了一项调查,评估干预前后EC的做法、知识和态度。干预后一个月进行电话访谈。与讲义干预相比,AD干预组的参与者对开具醋酸乌利司他(UPA)EC的临床考虑因素和加利福尼亚州药剂师开具EC的全州方案有了更多的了解。与分发干预相比,AD干预的参与者也更有可能在干预后开始开EC,这在定量和定性结果中都得到了观察。AD干预组中处方率的增加突出了AD在实施药剂师服务方面的效用。重点关注EC产品的临床考虑因素和全州药剂师开具EC处方的方案的培训可能会增加社区在药店获得EC的机会,并使药剂师提供更准确的咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信