Student-Generated Pre-Exam Questions is an Effective Tool for Participatory Learning: A Case Study from Ecology of Waterborne Pathogens Course

Q2 Social Sciences
Max Teplitski, Tracy Irani, Cory J. Krediet, Mariachiara Di Cesare, Massimiliano Marvasi
{"title":"Student-Generated Pre-Exam Questions is an Effective Tool for Participatory Learning: A Case Study from Ecology of Waterborne Pathogens Course","authors":"Max Teplitski,&nbsp;Tracy Irani,&nbsp;Cory J. Krediet,&nbsp;Mariachiara Di Cesare,&nbsp;Massimiliano Marvasi","doi":"10.1111/1541-4329.12129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This multiyear study helps elucidate how the instructional practice of student-generated questions support learning in a blended classroom in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics subjects. Students designed multiple-choice pre-exam questions aimed at higher levels of learning, according to Bloom's taxonomy. Student-generated questions were edited by the instructor and then discussed by the students in the classroom and in an online forum. We tested the hypothesis that this intervention improves student learning, measured as student achievement on the exam following the intervention, and compared to student achievement on the traditional exam (prior to which a review session focused on instructor-led recitation of the key concepts). Following the intervention in all years, average grade on the post-intervention exam increased by 7.44%. It is important to point out that not all students benefited equally from this activity. Students who were in the 4th quintile (60% to 80%) based on the results of the 1st exam demonstrated the highest achievement improving their performance on average by 12.37% percentage points (measured as a score on the 2nd exam). Gains were not observed in the semesters when the intervention was not implemented. In this study we provided students detailed instructions on how to design questions that focus on testing higher levels of learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":44041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1541-4329.12129","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4329.12129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This multiyear study helps elucidate how the instructional practice of student-generated questions support learning in a blended classroom in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics subjects. Students designed multiple-choice pre-exam questions aimed at higher levels of learning, according to Bloom's taxonomy. Student-generated questions were edited by the instructor and then discussed by the students in the classroom and in an online forum. We tested the hypothesis that this intervention improves student learning, measured as student achievement on the exam following the intervention, and compared to student achievement on the traditional exam (prior to which a review session focused on instructor-led recitation of the key concepts). Following the intervention in all years, average grade on the post-intervention exam increased by 7.44%. It is important to point out that not all students benefited equally from this activity. Students who were in the 4th quintile (60% to 80%) based on the results of the 1st exam demonstrated the highest achievement improving their performance on average by 12.37% percentage points (measured as a score on the 2nd exam). Gains were not observed in the semesters when the intervention was not implemented. In this study we provided students detailed instructions on how to design questions that focus on testing higher levels of learning.

Abstract Image

学生生成的考前问题是参与式学习的有效工具:来自《水传播病原体生态学》课程的案例研究
这项多年研究有助于阐明学生提出的问题的教学实践如何支持STEM科目的混合课堂学习。根据Bloom的分类法,学生们设计了多项选择题,旨在提高学习水平。学生提出的问题由讲师编辑,然后由学生在课堂和在线论坛上进行讨论。我们检验了这样一种假设,即这种干预措施改善了学生的学习,衡量为干预措施后学生在考试中的成绩,并与传统考试中的学生成绩进行了比较(在此之前,复习会侧重于教师引导的关键概念背诵)。经过所有年份的干预,干预后考试的平均成绩提高了7.44%。需要指出的是,并非所有学生都能平等地从这项活动中受益。根据第一次考试的成绩,处于第四个五分之一(60-80%)的学生表现出了最高的成绩,他们的成绩平均提高了12.37%的百分点(以第二次考试的分数衡量)。在没有实施干预措施的学期中没有观察到收益。在这项研究中,我们为学生提供了关于如何设计专注于测试更高学习水平的问题的详细说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science Education
Journal of Food Science Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) publishes the Journal of Food Science Education (JFSE) to serve the interest of its members in the field of food science education at all levels. The journal is aimed at all those committed to the improvement of food science education, including primary, secondary, undergraduate and graduate, continuing, and workplace education. It serves as an international forum for scholarly and innovative development in all aspects of food science education for "teachers" (individuals who facilitate, mentor, or instruct) and "students" (individuals who are the focus of learning efforts).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信