The Compound of Substratum and Essence. On a Puzzling Reference in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z 13.1038b2–3

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Elenchos Pub Date : 2019-11-21 DOI:10.1515/elen-2019-0017
Simone Seminara
{"title":"The Compound of Substratum and Essence. On a Puzzling Reference in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z 13.1038b2–3","authors":"Simone Seminara","doi":"10.1515/elen-2019-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper I deal with a puzzling passage, which occurs in Metaphysics Z 13.1038b2 – 3 and where Aristotle mentions four possible meanings of substance: the substratum, the essence, the compound of these (τὸ ἐκ τούτων) and the universal. This list accords only partially with the previous one in Z 3.1028b33–36, where Aristotle mentions the substratum, the essence, the universal and the genus. Thus, Z 13’s list omits Z 3’s genus, but includes τὸ ἐκ τούτων, which is standardly used by Aristotle to refer to the compound of matter and form. This is puzzling, for at least two reasons: (1) it is not clear what has happened to Z 3’s genus; (2) it is not clear what exactly is the reference of τὸ ἐκ τούτων, for the context suggests, at first glance awkwardly, that the compound in question is that of substratum and essence, and not of matter and form. These problems have led some scholars to delete τὸ ἐκ τούτων from the list. In this paper I provide two sets of arguments in order to resist the deletion. In the first set I show how, at least in principle, it would not be inaccurate to define the compound of matter and form as a “compound of substratum and essence”. In the second set, I show how, in fact, through the reference to the compound of substratum and essence, Aristotle does not want to designate, in Z 13, the hylomorphic composite. Rather, he aims to designate the notion of form regarded as universal, namely as ‘species’, which seems to reveal a peculiar sort of composition between a substratum (its genus) and an essence (its specific difference).","PeriodicalId":38726,"journal":{"name":"Elenchos","volume":"40 1","pages":"363 - 381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/elen-2019-0017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elenchos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2019-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract In this paper I deal with a puzzling passage, which occurs in Metaphysics Z 13.1038b2 – 3 and where Aristotle mentions four possible meanings of substance: the substratum, the essence, the compound of these (τὸ ἐκ τούτων) and the universal. This list accords only partially with the previous one in Z 3.1028b33–36, where Aristotle mentions the substratum, the essence, the universal and the genus. Thus, Z 13’s list omits Z 3’s genus, but includes τὸ ἐκ τούτων, which is standardly used by Aristotle to refer to the compound of matter and form. This is puzzling, for at least two reasons: (1) it is not clear what has happened to Z 3’s genus; (2) it is not clear what exactly is the reference of τὸ ἐκ τούτων, for the context suggests, at first glance awkwardly, that the compound in question is that of substratum and essence, and not of matter and form. These problems have led some scholars to delete τὸ ἐκ τούτων from the list. In this paper I provide two sets of arguments in order to resist the deletion. In the first set I show how, at least in principle, it would not be inaccurate to define the compound of matter and form as a “compound of substratum and essence”. In the second set, I show how, in fact, through the reference to the compound of substratum and essence, Aristotle does not want to designate, in Z 13, the hylomorphic composite. Rather, he aims to designate the notion of form regarded as universal, namely as ‘species’, which seems to reveal a peculiar sort of composition between a substratum (its genus) and an essence (its specific difference).
基质与本质的复合。论亚里士多德《形而上学》中的一个令人困惑的参考文献Z 13.1038b2-3
摘要在本文中,我处理了一段令人困惑的段落,它出现在形而上学Z 13.1038b2–3中,亚里士多德提到了物质的四种可能含义:底层、本质、这些(τὸ ἐκτιτωΓ)和泛性。该列表仅部分符合Z 3.1028b33-36中的前一个列表,亚里士多德在其中提到了底层、本质、普遍性和属。因此,Z13的列表省略了Z3的属,但包括τὸ ἐκτςτως,亚里士多德标准地用它来指代物质和形式的化合物。这令人困惑,至少有两个原因:(1)尚不清楚Z3的属发生了什么;(2) 目前尚不清楚τ的参考究竟是什么ὸ ἐκτιτωι,因为上下文第一眼就尴尬地表明,所讨论的化合物是基质和本质的化合物,而不是物质和形式的化合物。这些问题导致一些学者删除了τὸ ἐκτιτωΓ。在本文中,我提供了两组论据来抵制删除。在第一集中,我展示了至少在原则上,将物质和形式的化合物定义为“基质和本质的化合物”是不准确的。在第二组中,我展示了事实上,通过引用底层和本质的复合物,亚里士多德不想在Z13中指定亚纯复合物。相反,他旨在指定被视为普遍的形式概念,即“物种”,这似乎揭示了底层(其属)和本质(其特定差异)之间的一种特殊组成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Elenchos
Elenchos Arts and Humanities-Classics
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信