EFFECT OF WOOD STACKING ON PRODUCTIVITY AND COST OF FOREST EXTRACTION AND LOADING

Q4 Environmental Science
Floresta Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.5380/rf.v53i3.82105
William Masioli, Eduardo da Silva Lopes, Millana Bürger Pagnussat, Luiz Carlos Garsztka
{"title":"EFFECT OF WOOD STACKING ON PRODUCTIVITY AND COST OF FOREST EXTRACTION AND LOADING","authors":"William Masioli, Eduardo da Silva Lopes, Millana Bürger Pagnussat, Luiz Carlos Garsztka","doi":"10.5380/rf.v53i3.82105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the need to implement new operational procedures that provide productivity gains and cost reduction in wood harvesting and logistics, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of wood stacking on productivity and costs of forest extraction and loading operations. The study was carried out in eucalyptus plantations, where the extraction of wood with the forwarder and the loading of vehicles with the forest loader were evaluated. Three log stacking models on the edge of the stand were evaluated: control, inverted and adjacent, with variations in the alignment and distance of the logs concerning the edge of the stand. A study of the times and movements of the operations was carried out, determining the productivity (m³.h-1) and the production cost (R$.m-3) of the forestry operations. The data were compared using the Tukey test (α=5%) for parametric data and the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=5%) for non-parametric data, and the effect of different extraction distances was also verified using equations. The inverted stacking model contributed to the increase in extraction productivity, while the adjacent model in loading, with a reduction in production cost of around 22.1%. Simultaneously analyzing both wood stacking models, the standard model adopted by the forestry company was better with a 6.1% reduction in costs compared to the others. The productivity equations showed that the inverted stacking model contributed to the forwarder's higher performance at distances up to 140 m. The study showed that wood stacking models affect forestry operations and should be considered in operational planning.","PeriodicalId":53573,"journal":{"name":"Floresta","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Floresta","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/rf.v53i3.82105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the need to implement new operational procedures that provide productivity gains and cost reduction in wood harvesting and logistics, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of wood stacking on productivity and costs of forest extraction and loading operations. The study was carried out in eucalyptus plantations, where the extraction of wood with the forwarder and the loading of vehicles with the forest loader were evaluated. Three log stacking models on the edge of the stand were evaluated: control, inverted and adjacent, with variations in the alignment and distance of the logs concerning the edge of the stand. A study of the times and movements of the operations was carried out, determining the productivity (m³.h-1) and the production cost (R$.m-3) of the forestry operations. The data were compared using the Tukey test (α=5%) for parametric data and the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=5%) for non-parametric data, and the effect of different extraction distances was also verified using equations. The inverted stacking model contributed to the increase in extraction productivity, while the adjacent model in loading, with a reduction in production cost of around 22.1%. Simultaneously analyzing both wood stacking models, the standard model adopted by the forestry company was better with a 6.1% reduction in costs compared to the others. The productivity equations showed that the inverted stacking model contributed to the forwarder's higher performance at distances up to 140 m. The study showed that wood stacking models affect forestry operations and should be considered in operational planning.
木材堆放对森林采伐和装载生产率和成本的影响
由于需要实施新的作业程序,以提高木材采伐和物流的生产力并降低成本,本研究的目的是评估木材堆放对森林采伐和装载作业的生产力和成本的影响。这项研究是在桉树种植园进行的,在那里,用货代提取木材和用森林装载机装载车辆进行了评估。对林分边缘的三种原木堆放模型进行了评估:对照、倒置和相邻,以及林分边缘原木排列和距离的变化。对作业的时间和运动进行了研究,确定了林业作业的生产力(m³.h-1)和生产成本(R$.m-3)。使用参数数据的Tukey检验(α=5%)和非参数数据的Kruskal-Wallis检验(α=5%)对数据进行比较,并使用方程验证了不同提取距离的影响。倒置堆叠模型有助于提高提取生产率,而相邻模型有助于装载,生产成本降低了约22.1%。同时分析两种木材堆叠模型,林业公司采用的标准模型更好,与其他模型相比,成本降低了6.1%。生产力方程表明,倒置堆叠模型有助于货代在140米以下的距离上获得更高的性能。研究表明,木材堆叠模型会影响林业运营,应在运营规划中予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Floresta
Floresta Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Revista Floresta admits articles of scientific contribution in Forest Science, in the areas of Nature Conservation, Economy and Forest Policy, Forest Management, Silviculture and Wood Technology. The main task is to promote and divulgate the development of Forest Science in Brazil and in the world. Articles published in Revista Floresta are under total responsibility of the authors, who are aware that they are original studies. It remains implicit that articles were not submitted for publication to any other divulgation media. It remains explicit the agreement of authors to norms of the journal and, along the development of their work, the observance of ethic aspects and respect of the current copyright legislation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书