PRAXIS® Content Knowledge for Teaching: Initial Reliability and Validity Results for Elementary Reading Language Arts and Mathematics

Q3 Social Sciences
Geoffrey Phelps, Jonathan Steinberg, Dawn Leusner, Jennifer Minsky, Karen Castellano, Laura McCulla
{"title":"PRAXIS® Content Knowledge for Teaching: Initial Reliability and Validity Results for Elementary Reading Language Arts and Mathematics","authors":"Geoffrey Phelps,&nbsp;Jonathan Steinberg,&nbsp;Dawn Leusner,&nbsp;Jennifer Minsky,&nbsp;Karen Castellano,&nbsp;Laura McCulla","doi":"10.1002/ets2.12295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The primary purpose of this report is to provide preliminary evidence on the measurement properties for newly designed assessments of content knowledge for teaching (CKT) in elementary reading language arts (RLA) and mathematics. The goal is to offer the CKT tests through the <i>PRAXIS</i>® assessment. Additional analyses were conducted to provide initial evidence on the validity of the CKT assessments. One set of analyses investigated whether the test scores were sensitive to differences in participants' educational backgrounds that might be associated with opportunities to develop CKT. A second set of analyses involved examining score differences by the race/ethnicity of the participating candidates to provide evidence on whether the sample of participants in this study show group score differences that are comparable to what is typically observed on licensure exams. Finally, participant performance on the CKT tests was compared with performance on comparable PRAXIS assessments to examine potential differences in the difficulty of the items.</p>","PeriodicalId":11972,"journal":{"name":"ETS Research Report Series","volume":"2020 1","pages":"1-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ets2.12295","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ETS Research Report Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ets2.12295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The primary purpose of this report is to provide preliminary evidence on the measurement properties for newly designed assessments of content knowledge for teaching (CKT) in elementary reading language arts (RLA) and mathematics. The goal is to offer the CKT tests through the PRAXIS® assessment. Additional analyses were conducted to provide initial evidence on the validity of the CKT assessments. One set of analyses investigated whether the test scores were sensitive to differences in participants' educational backgrounds that might be associated with opportunities to develop CKT. A second set of analyses involved examining score differences by the race/ethnicity of the participating candidates to provide evidence on whether the sample of participants in this study show group score differences that are comparable to what is typically observed on licensure exams. Finally, participant performance on the CKT tests was compared with performance on comparable PRAXIS assessments to examine potential differences in the difficulty of the items.

Abstract Image

教学PRAXIS®内容知识:初级阅读语言艺术和数学的初步信度和效度结果
本报告的主要目的是为新设计的小学阅读语言艺术(RLA)和数学教学内容知识评估(CKT)的测量特性提供初步证据。目标是通过PRAXIS®评估提供CKT测试。进行了额外的分析,为CKT评估的有效性提供初步证据。一组分析调查了测试分数是否对参与者的教育背景差异敏感,这可能与发展CKT的机会有关。第二组分析涉及根据参与候选人的种族/民族检查得分差异,以提供证据,证明本研究中的参与者样本是否显示出与执照考试中典型观察到的群体得分差异。最后,将参与者在CKT测试中的表现与在可比PRAXIS评估中的表现进行比较,以检查项目难度的潜在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ETS Research Report Series
ETS Research Report Series Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信